A view on the Future of Anti-Money Laundering

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) is an important area of financial regulation that is constantly evolving. It is difficult to predict with certainty how AML control will evolve over the next decade. However, it is likely that AML control by 2030 will involve a combination of traditional AML measures and emerging technologies and approaches. Some of the latest trends and potential developments that could shape AML controls and procedures in coming years include:

1. Increased use of technology: Financial institutions are using advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their AML programs. These technologies can help identify suspicious activity and patterns that may indicate money laundering.
2. Enhanced customer due diligence: Financial institutions are focusing more on customer due diligence, which involves identifying and verifying the identity of customers, as well as understanding their financial transactions and business relationships. This helps to prevent money laundering by ensuring that financial institutions know who their customers are and what they are doing.
3. Greater emphasis on risk assessment: Financial institutions are conducting more comprehensive risk assessments to identify and prioritize areas of highest risk for money laundering. This allows them to focus their resources and efforts on the areas that pose the greatest threat.
4. Enhanced data sharing: Financial institutions are sharing more information with each other and with regulatory authorities to help identify and prevent money laundering. This includes sharing information about suspicious activity, customers, and transactions.
5. Increased focus on emerging threats: Financial institutions are paying more attention to emerging threats, such as virtual currencies and non-bank financial institutions, to ensure that they are not used for money laundering.

Let’s have a deeper look in each trend in the coming chapter.

1- Increased use of technology

We could consider various elements in this use of technology?:

A. Increased use of biometric and other identity verification technologies: Financial institutions may adopt more sophisticated technologies to verify the identity of their customers and prevent identity fraud, which can be used in conjunction with AML efforts.

Such technologies can offer a number of benefits for AML efforts:

1. Enhanced security: Biometric technologies, such as fingerprint scanners and facial recognition systems, can provide a more secure method of verifying a person's identity, as it is difficult to forge or replicate biometric data. This can help to prevent identity fraud, which can be used to facilitate money laundering and other illicit activities.
2. Improved accuracy: Biometric and other identity verification technologies can help to ensure that financial institutions have accurate and up-to-date information about their customers, which can be used to more accurately assess the risk of money laundering and financing of terrorism.
3. Enhanced compliance: Adopting biometric and other identity verification technologies can help financial institutions comply with AML regulations, which often require financial institutions to verify the identity of their customers as part of their AML efforts.
4. Improved customer experience: Biometric technologies can provide a more convenient and efficient way for customers to verify their identity, compared to traditional methods such as presenting a physical ID document. This can improve the customer experience and help to build trust between financial institutions and their customers.

B. Artificial intelligence (AI) can potentially improve anti-money laundering (AML) procedures in a number of ways:

1. Automation: AI can be used to automate parts of the AML process, such as the analysis of transactions and identification of suspicious activity. This can help to reduce the workload of AML analysts and improve the efficiency of the process.
2. Data analysis: AI can be used to analyze large amounts of data, including transaction data, customer data, and other relevant information, to identify patterns and trends that may indicate money laundering activity.
3. Risk assessment: AI can be used to help assess the risk of money laundering for different customers and transactions, allowing financial institutions to prioritize their AML efforts and allocate resources more effectively.
4. Enhanced detection: AI can be used to develop more sophisticated and effective detection algorithms, which can help to identify and prevent money laundering more effectively.
5. Compliance: AI can be used to help financial institutions comply with AML regulations, by automating the process of checking transactions and customers against lists of sanctioned individuals and entities.

C. Blockchain and other emerging technologies have the potential to enhance the transparency and traceability of financial transactions and improve AML control in a number of ways:

1. Increased transparency: Blockchain is a decentralized, distributed ledger technology that allows transactions to be recorded and verified in a transparent and immutable manner. This can help to increase the transparency of financial transactions and make it easier to identify and trace illicit activity.
2. Enhanced traceability: Blockchain and other emerging technologies, such as smart contracts, can provide a digital record of transactions that can be used to trace the flow of funds and identify suspicious activity. This can make it easier for financial institutions and authorities to identify and investigate money laundering and other illicit activities.
3. Improved risk assessment: By providing more transparency and traceability, blockchain and other emerging technologies can help financial institutions to more accurately assess the risk of money laundering and financing of terrorism associated with different transactions and customers.
4. Enhanced compliance: The transparent and traceable nature of blockchain and other emerging technologies can help financial institutions to comply with AML regulations, which often require financial institutions to maintain accurate and complete records of their transactions.

2- Enhanced customer due diligence (ECDD) is a process of conducting more in-depth and extensive checks on customers, in order to identify and assess the risk of money laundering or financing of terrorism. ECDD can help to improve AML procedures in a number of ways:

Improved risk assessment: ECDD allows financial institutions to gather more information about their customers, which can help to more accurately assess the risk of money laundering or financing of terrorism associated with them. This can help to prioritize AML efforts and allocate resources more effectively.

Enhanced detection: By conducting more thorough checks on customers, financial institutions can potentially identify more instances of money laundering or financing of terrorism that might have otherwise gone undetected.

Better compliance: Conducting ECDD can help financial institutions comply with AML regulations, which often require more extensive customer due diligence for higher-risk customers.

Improved customer relationships: By conducting ECDD, financial institutions can demonstrate to their customers that they are taking steps to prevent money laundering and financing of terrorism, which can help to build trust and improve customer relationships.

3- Risk-based approach: the trend in AML is towards a more proactive, risk-based approach that involves the use of technology and enhanced data sharing to identify and prevent money laundering. A risk-based approach helps to improve the effectiveness of AML controls by allowing financial institutions to focus their resources and efforts on the areas that pose the greatest risk for money laundering. This approach involves conducting a comprehensive risk assessment to identify and prioritize areas of highest risk.

By focusing on higher-risk areas, financial institutions can more effectively identify and prevent money laundering activity. This approach also allows financial institutions to allocate their resources more efficiently, as they can prioritize their efforts on areas that are most likely to be exploited for money laundering.

In addition, a risk-based approach helps to ensure that AML controls are proportional to the level of risk. This means that financial institutions can tailor their controls to the specific risks they face, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.

4- Data sharing: it can greatly improve AML control by enabling financial institutions and other relevant authorities to access and analyze more information about potential money laundering activity. This can help to:

1. Enhance detection: By sharing data, financial institutions and authorities can potentially identify more instances of money laundering that might have otherwise gone undetected. This can be especially useful for detecting cross-border money laundering, which may involve multiple financial institutions and jurisdictions.
2. Improve risk assessment: Data sharing can provide financial institutions with more information about the risk profile of their customers and transactions, allowing them to more accurately assess the risk of money laundering. This can help them to allocate resources more effectively and prioritize their AML efforts.
3. Enhance compliance: Data sharing can help financial institutions comply with AML regulations by providing them with access to lists of sanctioned individuals and entities, and allowing them to check transactions and customers against these lists more effectively.
4. Support investigations: Data sharing can also support investigations into money laundering by providing authorities with access to more information that can be used to build a case against individuals or organizations involved in money laundering activities.

5- Emerging threats such as virtual currencies and transactions through non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) can pose significant challenges to AML control because they may be more difficult to monitor and regulate than traditional financial instruments and institutions.

1. Virtual currencies: Virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, are decentralized digital assets that are not issued or backed by any central authority. This makes it harder for financial institutions and authorities to track and regulate their use. Virtual currencies can also be used to facilitate anonymous transactions, which can make it easier for individuals to engage in money laundering and other illicit activities.
2. Non-bank financial institutions: NBFIs, such as money service businesses and virtual asset service providers, may not be subject to the same level of regulation as traditional financial institutions, making it harder for authorities to monitor and control their activities. This can make it easier for individuals to use NBFIs to facilitate money laundering and other illicit activities.

Therefore, an increased focus on emerging threats such as virtual currencies and transactions through NBFIs is important in order to ensure that these new technologies and institutions are not used for money laundering and other illicit purposes. This can involve introducing new regulations and oversight mechanisms to ensure that these emerging threats are properly regulated and monitored. It can also involve educating financial institutions and the general public about the potential risks associated with emerging threats and how to use them safely and responsibly.

Now that we have a view on future trends, we can question current weaknesses and the number of reasons why AML control can sometimes fail:

1. Insufficient resources: AML control requires significant resources, including personnel, technology, and data. If financial institutions do not allocate sufficient resources to AML control, they may be unable to effectively identify and prevent money laundering and financing of terrorism.
2. Lack of collaboration: AML control often involves collaboration among financial institutions, authorities, and other stakeholders. If there is a lack of cooperation and coordination among these parties, it can hinder the effectiveness of AML control.
3. Weaknesses in AML systems and controls: Financial institutions may have weaknesses in their AML systems and controls, such as inadequate customer due diligence procedures or insufficient monitoring of transactions. These weaknesses can make it easier for individuals to engage in money laundering and other illicit activities.
4. Evolving threats: Money launderers and other illicit actors are constantly seeking new ways to evade detection and evade AML controls. This means that financial institutions and authorities must be constantly vigilant and adapt their AML efforts to address evolving threats.
5. Regulatory gaps: There may be gaps in AML regulations that make it easier for individuals to engage in money laundering and other illicit activities. For example, some countries may have weaker AML regulations or may not be fully compliant with international standards.
6. The human factor can be a reason why AML controls fail. Some potential ways in which the human factor can contribute to AML control failures include:

Human error: AML control processes can be complex and involve the analysis of large amounts of data. Human analysts may make mistakes in their analysis, which can lead to missed opportunities to detect and prevent money laundering and financing of terrorism.

Corrupt employees: Some employees may be corrupt and willing to facilitate money laundering or other illicit activities. This can undermine AML controls and allow illicit activity to go undetected.

Insufficient training: Employees who are not adequately trained in AML procedures may be less effective at identifying and preventing money laundering and financing of terrorism.

Poor management: Poor management or oversight of AML controls can contribute to their failure, as it may lead to inadequate resources being allocated to AML efforts, or to weaknesses in AML systems and controls going unaddressed.

Another question is if automating all AML controls is a perfect solution or if it could lead to a number of negative consequences. The answer is mixed; as human supervision will always be needed. Some potential risks of automating all AML controls include:

1. Loss of human judgment: Automating all AML controls may result in the loss of human judgment and expertise in the process. This could lead to increase in false positives or false negatives, as human analysts may be better able to identify subtle patterns and nuances that may indicate money laundering or financing of terrorism.
2. Bias in data: The data used to train AI systems for AML control may be biased, which could lead to the automation of biased AML controls. This could disproportionately affect certain groups of people, leading to discrimination and other negative consequences.
3. Dependence on technology: Relying solely on automated AML controls could create a dependence on technology, which could lead to problems if the technology fails or is compromised.
4. Lack of transparency: Automated AML controls may be less transparent than manual controls, making it harder for financial institutions and authorities to understand how decisions are being made and to identify and address any problems that may arise.

It is important to carefully consider the risks and limitations of fully automating the process, and to ensure that human judgment and expertise are still an integral part of the process.

On the specific point of overcontrol of risks and specifically the pain point of increase in false positive (also for the people that have the bad luck of namesake or having their identity stolen) there are a number of measures that can be taken to avoid bias:

1. - Use of multiple detection methods: Using multiple detection methods, such as both rule-based and machine learning-based approaches, can help to reduce the number of false positives by providing a more robust and accurate assessment of the risk of money laundering.
2. Enhanced review of false positives: Conducting a review of false positives can help to identify the causes of false positives and take steps to address them. This could involve adjusting the parameters of the detection algorithms, improving the quality of the data being used, or providing additional training to analysts.
3. Human oversight: Incorporating human oversight and judgment into the AML process can help to reduce the number of false positives, as human analysts may be better able to identify subtle patterns and nuances that may indicate money laundering or financing of terrorism.
4. Regular testing and calibration: Regularly testing and calibrating AML systems and controls can help to ensure that they are operating effectively and accurately, and can help to identify and address any issues that may be causing false positives. Calibration and reframing is too often an issue overlooked and understressed by developers of AML software.
5. Collaboration with stakeholders: Collaborating with stakeholders, such as customers and other financial institutions, can help to provide a more complete picture of transactions and customers, which can reduce the number of false positives.

We have seen a number of technical features related to AML but we need to consider also how we prepare oursleves and our organizations to face this risk. What improvements should we see in terms of organization for AML management??

Audit can definetely play a more active role in AML in terms of data analysis, forensic accounting, and fraud examination. This function is where you will find the business specialists and most valued resources; and even a control post fact is a interesting source to identify pattern and improve internal procedures, training and test scenarii for automated systems. Some potential ways in which audit can contribute to AML efforts include:

1. Data analysis: Audit can use data analysis techniques, such as data mining and visualization, to identify patterns and trends that may indicate money laundering or financing of terrorism.
2. Forensic accounting: Audit can use forensic accounting techniques, such as tracing funds and identifying unusual transactions, to investigate suspicious activity and gather evidence of money laundering or financing of terrorism.
3. Fraud examination: Audit can use fraud examination techniques, such as analyzing documentation and interviewing witnesses, to identify and investigate instances of fraud that may be related to money laundering or financing of terrorism.

A transversal and collaborative approach can be an effective way to manage AML processes. Some potential benefits of a transversal and collaborative approach include:

1. Enhanced detection: By involving multiple departments and stakeholders in the AML process, financial institutions can potentially identify more instances of money laundering and financing of terrorism that might have otherwise gone undetected.
2. Improved risk assessment: A transversal and collaborative approach can provide financial institutions with a more comprehensive view of the risk profile of their customers and transactions, enabling them to more accurately assess the risk of money laundering and financing of terrorism.
3. Enhanced compliance: by involving multiple stakeholders in the AML process, financial institutions can ensure that they are complying with all relevant regulations and market standards.
4. Improved customer relationships: A transversal and collaborative approach can help financial institutions to build trust and improve customer relationships by demonstrating that they are taking a comprehensive and collaborative approach to AML.
5. Increase collaboration between the lines of defense, between the different departments of the institution, between the financial institutions and the supervisory authorities; also going across the border and outside the banking community to improve exchange of information and alerts, data analysis and knowledge management.?At the cross roads of training and collaboration, we should see more use of red teams to conduct test atatcks and attempts on the first and second lines of defense to improve actions and countermeasures.

Bottomline is that transversal and collaborative approach is an effective way to manage AML processes, as it can help to enhance detection, improve risk assessment, enhance compliance, and improve customer relationships.

Improvement recruitment and training. In order to effectively recruit and train personnel for AML functions in the coming years, financial institutions should look for candidates with the following profile:

1. Strong analytical skills: AML analysts should have strong analytical skills and be able to analyze large amounts of data in order to identify patterns and trends that may indicate money laundering or financing of terrorism.
2. Attention to detail: AML analysts should have a high level of attention to detail, as they will be responsible for reviewing and analyzing a large number of transactions and customer records.
3. Strong communication skills: AML analysts should be able to communicate effectively with colleagues and stakeholders, as they may need to explain their analysis and findings to others.
4. Familiarity with AML regulations and standards: AML analysts should have a good understanding of AML regulations and standards, and be familiar with the legal and regulatory framework in which they operate.
5. Familiarity with emerging technologies: AML analysts should have some familiarity with emerging technologies, such as AI and machine learning, as these technologies are likely to play a greater role in AML in the coming years.

Financial institutions should look for candidates with strong analytical skills, attention to detail, strong communication skills, familiarity with AML regulations and standards, and familiarity with emerging technologies when recruiting and training personnel for AML functions in the coming years.

Last but not least?; involvement and ownership of AML risks at all levels is key. All employees can play a role in AML control. Some potential ways in which employees can contribute to AML efforts include:

1. Complying with AML policies and procedures: All employees should be familiar with and comply with the AML policies and procedures of their organization. This includes following procedures for identifying and reporting suspicious activity and complying with customer due diligence requirements.
2. Identifying and reporting suspicious activity: All employees should be vigilant and report any suspicious activity that they observe to the appropriate authorities. This could include unusual or unexplained transactions, or customers who exhibit unusual behavior.
3. Maintaining accurate and complete records: All employees should ensure that accurate and complete records are maintained, as these are essential for AML efforts. This includes keeping accurate and up-to-date customer records and maintaining complete and accurate records of transactions.
4. Participating in AML training: All employees should participate in AML training to ensure that they are aware of their responsibilities and how to identify and report suspicious activity. This implies also the sharing of business cases and identified fraud patterns to improve the deep learning and test scenarii for AI and other IT solutions deployed by the institution.

Overall, all employees and all levels of the organization have a role in AML control by complying with AML policies and procedures, identifying and reporting suspicious activity, maintaining accurate and complete records, and sharing information and AML best practices.

#AML?#Risks?#Financial regulation