Venezuela: The End of an Illusionary Democracy?

Venezuela: The End of an Illusionary Democracy?

Recent reports and commentaries on Venezuela suggest that the country, which supposedly had maintained a semblance of a democracy, has now undeniably transformed into a dictatorship. However, observations such as "the fraud has never been so obvious" merely reflect a new twist in the spiral of authoritarianism. Anyone claiming that Venezuela has only recently turned into a dictatorship has likely not been paying close attention to what had been happening in Venezuela over the past 10 years or so.

Let's be clear: The current situation in Venezuela is nothing new. The recent developments merely confirm what was apparent a decade ago. This recognition is crucial for understanding the nature of the regime we are dealing with, who we negotiate with and about what, and how such negotiations should be approached. It is futile to negotiate with Maduro over internal political freedoms. Wo don't do this with his sponsors like Putin or Xi either. Whoever feels better then is welcome to make further moral speeches against the Caracas regime. But the focus of real politics should be on mitigating the damage the regime causes for its people and managing the externally fallout.

The recent election debacle in Venezuela has clarified the lines between the different international observers and commentators, be it media, organizations or politicians. Those who continue to show goodwill toward the Caracas regime and believe in the presence of some residual kind of democratic structures in Venezuela are either ideologically blinded or maliciously na?ve.

The international community must now definitely recognize the true nature of the Venezuelan regime and adjust its approach accordingly. The focus should be on containing the external damage and managing the internal repercussions rather than betting on internal democratic reforms in the foreseeable future. This clarity is essential for any meaningful engagement with the Venezuelan situation.


P.D., as a sort of disclaimer: Admittedly, over the past four years, Venezuela has not been as prominent on my radar as it once was. That's partly because in 2020 I stopped reporting daily for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , for which the Venezuela story had always been one of the most interesting and consistent topics. Moreover, after more than twenty years of covering Venezuela, and having witnessed the rise and rule of Hugo Chávez and his unspeakable successor-imitator, Nicolás Maduro, I had developed a deep frustration that reached a point where I felt quite uncomfortable covering Venezuela. But these days the Venezuela virus has caught me again.

Carl Moses

Economist & Publicist │ Latin America, Economic & Political Analysis │ Independent Consultant | Business, Investments, Media & Communication │ F.A.Z. PRO

2 个月

Sad as it may be, Brian Winter ist absolutely right: "Unpopular opinion for social media, but US, Brazil and Colombia are all behaving as if they expect Maduro to stay." I share his findings in both senses of the word: https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/brian-winter-26350222_unpopular-opinion-for-social-media-but-us-activity-7234250264453533696-7Daw?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

回复
Ulrich Bernd Blasberg

CFO | C-Level | CORP & Intl (Trilingue) | LatAM CCA Cluster | Dir. Finanzas & IT | CSC & ICT | Tax | Innovación estratégica Digital | A prueba de Crisis | Centrado en Soluciones | Incrementar valor de mercado y goodwill

2 个月

It is been 20 years of a smell of democracy to cover the autocracy of the banana republic; 20 years and suddenly the election is fraudulent. Biden and Blinken were fools dealing with Maduro. And still are more than fools.

回复
Carl Moses

Economist & Publicist │ Latin America, Economic & Political Analysis │ Independent Consultant | Business, Investments, Media & Communication │ F.A.Z. PRO

3 个月
Carl Moses

Economist & Publicist │ Latin America, Economic & Political Analysis │ Independent Consultant | Business, Investments, Media & Communication │ F.A.Z. PRO

3 个月

Today, for the first time since the Venezuelan elections, the well respected political analyst Luis Vicente León?has commented on the situation in Venezuela and on the prospects for international mediation: In a post on X León analyzes the potential outcomes of #Brazil, #Colombia, and #Mexico's efforts to mediate a solution to the Venezuelan crisis. He outlines two theoretical negotiations: 1) A negotiation that seeks to reduce the exit costs for Maduro and the chavista system to recognize an opposition victory and allow a transition. This scenario is unlikely, as Maduro does not currently perceive his stay in power as more costly than an exit. 2) A negotiation that aims to secure concessions from Maduro for the opposition, assuming he remains in power. However, this is also improbable, as key opposition figures and the U.S. are unlikely to accept such terms in exchange for recognizing Maduro. León concludes that the international negotiators may focus on pressuring unilateral government concessions to restore some basic democratic conditions, such as releasing political prisoners, enabling opposition leaders, reforming the electoral system and amending the constitution. https://x.com/luisvicenteleon/status/1822655928132350269

回复
Carl Moses

Economist & Publicist │ Latin America, Economic & Political Analysis │ Independent Consultant | Business, Investments, Media & Communication │ F.A.Z. PRO

3 个月

???????????? Lateinamerikas Progressive tun sich schwer damit, den Wahlbetrug in Venezuela zu verurteilen. Das ist Wasser auf die Mühlen der Rechten. https://taz.de/Venezuelas-Linke/!6025089/ via @tazgezwitscher

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Carl Moses的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了