Are Users Holding Back Twitter’s Progress?
The current strategy at Twitter is clearly not working as user growth continues to elude them. Clearly a new direction is desperately needed in order to attract new users although whenever Twitter tries something new even if they are minor changes, the existing user base has a temper tantrum and reacts by leaving the platform. It looks to me as if Twitter is caught between a rock and a hard place.
Although Tweets currently appear in our feeds in reverse chronological order, however, recent reports suggest the possible introduction of a new algorithmic timeline bearing a format incredibly similar to that of Facebook, which has led to many users accusing the social network of having an identity crisis of sorts.
The idea behind this latest change is to solve Twitter’s evident white noise problem where users struggle to find useful or engaging information from within the large volume of senseless tweets emanating from the network. The new algorithm would push promoted or popular tweets to the top of the feed so as to make it feel more relevant thus allowing users to quickly see what the majority are talking about.
Ironically it was Twitter that then found itself trending under the hashtag #RIPTwitter after existing users started expressing their annoyance at the platform. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey quickly tweeted to set the record straight and offer assurances to the user base that they were not planning on reordering the feed timelines next week.
Twitter has always been the place where users live-tweet anything and everything in real-time as it happens and those tweets show up at the top of the feeds, so to change this order by putting the more popular or promoted (a.k.a. paid) tweets on top thus burying the latest live tweets in the flowing river of tweets beneath would in essence take away what its users love about the platform in the first place. The bottom line is that nobody wants an algorithm deciding what they can or cannot see and most of all users do not want another Facebook clone on their hands.
The idea of prioritizing a tweet of someone's funny YouTube clip from a year ago over a live event unfolding was never going to be well received. Maybe its time for the leaders at Twitter towers to start listening to the list of improvements or features that their users really want rather than brainstorming their own ideas behind closed doors.
As users we love to consume events via tweets on Twitter as they occur live in the real world, so it seems rather disappointing that this was not taken into account before launching straight into the testing of the aforementioned change. On the other hand I do question the Twitter community’s perpetual schizophrenia and might even feel a bit of sympathy for the platform when its user base persistently grumbles about the lack of innovation and changes in the platform while at the same time equally becoming outraged with every new idea that Twitter strives to release!
The rumors around introducing an option that allows users to click and expand on a tweet to reveal a further up to 10,000 characters seemed like a reasonable idea in principle. But even this idea was quickly condemned by the howling mob. It looks like this particular social network is damned if they do and damned if they don’t in the eyes of their user-base.
Fortunately in the case of the feed-order situation under discussion in this blog, the Verge were at hand to nullify any fears by confirming that there will be an opt-out mechanism from the algorithmic timeline feature that may or may not appear on the horizon. Only time will tell if Twitter provides such new optional features in order to attract new users on their elusive quest for growth without upsetting the existing users who are guilty of being a little stuck in their ways.
Jack Dorsey is once again being reminded that taking the reins of Twitter can be somewhat of a thankless task. Most users recognize that Twitter has more than a few problems, and pressure is now on to deliver meaningful change to the platform.
However in the end perhaps the biggest change required at the social platform is in the attitude of its existing users who may need to be a little more open-minded about new approaches and become more accepting of new innovative ideas.
Nobody wants to see Twitter morph into a Facebook clone, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that the biggest obstacle in the way of Twitter’s progress are its users.
Thank you for reading. I write and publish weekly via www.Blogbrain.org, the dedicated repository for my articles, essays and blogs on all things business, digital, life, management & technology. If my blogs help you and you'd like to consider nominating me for the LinkedIN Top Voices List then please fill out this short form. With gratitude.
Function Shift and Knowledge Management Specialist
8 年Anticipation and Concentration can be used to influence customer behaviour and also used as a obstacle for competitors?
Hose wife at House wife
8 年So true
Marketing & Communications Manager at Bethesda Urban Partnership Inc
8 年I don't think the problem is the users, I think the problem is that Twitter's leadership has a fundamental misunderstanding of what Twitter actually is. It was so clear 9 years ago; Twitter was a micro-blogging site. Share your thoughts in 140 characters or less. That lead to a couple of things: a constant stream of bite-sized information, and users that worked hard to create smart, engaging, concise content. Over the past few years we've seen Twitter become a major news source, allowing citizens to shed light and call attention to things like Ferguson and the Black Lives Matter movement. But at the same time we've seen Twitter try to become more and more like Facebook; allowing images and video, debating longer posts, now this potential new algorithm. Twitter does not need to promote the "best" content - it needs to continue providing the service that people find real value in.
Real Estate at Chuck Sebesta
8 年Great Read
Managing the people who manage projects
8 年Maybe before twitter tries to adjust their service offerings they should work on repairing the broken trust relationship with their user base. Twitter is becoming notorious for censoring certain kinds of political speech not for the way it is presented but rather because it doesn't fit their world view. They have attacked super-users like Milo Yannilopolus, @Nero, for having the temerity to point this out. They refused to act against propaganda and recruiting accounts for ISIS until forced to by mass action from the user base. Their new Trust & Safety Council who will help moderate the platform is exceptionally lopsided in the membership. For a platform that trades on being an open communication platform for all ideas it provides daily examples of that being a lie. They need to stop attacking users, censoring speech, and using the ToS as a weapon to silence anyone the company disagrees with. Until they address these issues changes in user experience are irrelevant.