The user developed an integrated hybrid risk assessment system for construction disputes at the preconstruction phase using the Delphi Method.
Er.Navaneeth Chand Thalluri
"Experienced Construction Professional | Event Management Expert | Master's in Construction Project Management"
Using the Delphi Method to develop an integrated hybrid risk assessment system for construction disputes during the preconstruction phase entails a structured method that depends on expert consensus to identify, analyse, and minimise potential conflicts.
Here's a summary of how such a system may be organised and its main components
How to Understand the Delphi Method
The Delphi Method is a strategy for reaching consensus among a panel of experts using a series of surveys and feedback rounds.
It is especially beneficial when dealing with complicated situations involving several variables and limited empirical data.
The procedure is iterative, allowing experts to fine-tune their solutions depending on group comments.
Components of Integrated Hybrid Risk Assessment System
An integrated hybrid risk assessment system integrates many techniques to risk assessment, including both qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
The procedure is defined by the components listed below:
Specialist Selection:
Select a varied panel of specialists from construction, contract law, engineering, project management, and conflict resolution.
This diversity enables a full understanding of dangers.
Identification of risks:
Begin by asking open-ended questions to uncover potential preconstruction hazards that might lead to conflicts.
This encompasses hazards associated with design, contracts, stakeholder communication, budgeting, scheduling, and regulatory compliance.
Delphi Rounds
It involves many rounds of surveys where experts share their perspectives on identified hazards.
In each round, experts analyse anonymized input from prior rounds to fine-tune their replies.
The process will continue until the principal risks are agreed upon.
Risk categorization:
Once consensus has been reached, classify the risks according to their type (e.g., design-related, contractual, communication, or regulatory) and possible influence on construction conflicts.
Quantitative assessment
This involves using quantitative tools to evaluate the likelihood and severity of the identified risks.
Risk prioritisation might entail the use of scoring systems or probability-impact matrices.
领英推荐
Development of Mitigation Strategies:
Develop mitigation solutions for each of the identified and assessed hazards. These tactics should include preventative measures, emergency plans, and conflict resolution techniques.
Integration of data
Integrate risk assessment results into the preconstruction planning process.
This ensures that identified hazards are handled proactively and that mitigation plans are in place.
Training and Communication:
Share the identified risks and mitigation methods with the project team. Conduct training sessions to ensure that everyone knows their duties in risk minimization.
Ongoing Monitoring and Review:
Set up a continuous monitoring system to track identified hazards during the preconstruction period.
Regularly examine and update the risk assessment system to reflect new hazards or changes in the project scope.
Reporting and Documentation:
Maintain detailed records of the risk assessment process, including expert comments, risk prioritisation, and mitigation solutions.
This documentation can help resolve disagreements and improve future initiatives.
Advantages of an Integrated Hybrid Risk Assessment System.
Proactive Risk Management:
Identifying and resolving risks early in the project lowers the possibility of disagreements.
Consensus-Based Approach:
The Delphi Method guarantees that risk assessments are founded on expert opinion and consensus.
Comprehensive Scope:
The hybrid system supports both qualitative and quantitative assessments, offering a strong foundation for risk management.
Reduced conflicts:
By eliminating risks during the preconstruction period, the approach helps to decrease construction conflicts, resulting in smoother project execution.
This comprehensive hybrid risk assessment system, created using the Delphi Method, provides a systematic method for controlling risks and decreasing construction conflicts throughout the preconstruction period.
It encourages teamwork, responsibility, and proactive planning, which contribute to the success of building projects.