Usefulness of Standard Economic Indicators within Tactical Asset allocation

Usefulness of Standard Economic Indicators within Tactical Asset allocation

The first post on Modern TAA was a look at what 3 research think tanks thought about the Usefulness of Standard Economic Indicators within Tactical Asset allocation…

drumroll…

they think it works…

BUT the 3 thought leaders would struggle to convince a jury they particularly unbiased: Journal of professional portfolio managers European, European investment Bank (EIB) & Stockholm mathematics department 

In conclusion the studies suggest a simple combination approach based on percentile scores of standard indicators from four scientifically valid areas (valuation, trend, risk, and macroeconomics) can significantly improve a multi-asset portfolio’s performance and generate high information ratios.

Personally, for medium- and long-term investors, macro- based asset allocation using standard indicators is a solid avenue to follow. Yet for a practitioner looking at risk management, it would be desirable to better understand the dynamic link between asset prices and cyclical conditions, as the former is an amplifying driver for macroeconomic and financial downturns and vice versa.

In short, it works but not all the time. :)

And this is why I feel this topic is so exciting to explore, as with all scientific disciplines, economics is evolving, "embracing openness and process, and asking how structures or phenomena come into being."


As professional practitioners we can continue assuming no change to the field or look to evolve alongside. 


Summary

There is value in better understanding how Standard Economic Indicators within Tactical Asset allocation, so we will continue to dive in.

See list of topics we will explore here:

https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/garethnicholson_neverstoplearning-askthatquestion-economy-activity-6773041394090147840-obkC


The Markets changing/needs refinement so best we change and re-educate alongside.

On this point we start with recommended reading list:

1) Money and Asset Prices in Boom and Bust - pdf available here (https://lnkd.in/gMy4RCW)

2) Economyths - Orrell

3) Fooled by Randomness - Taleb

4) The Drunkard's Walk - Mlodinow

5) The Money Formula - Wilmott and Orrell

6) Expected Returns - Ilmane

7 )Forward Rates and Expected Rates are NOT the same

8 )Trading the Fixed Income, Inflation and Credit Markets A Relative Value Guide - Bowler & Schofield

9)Risk and Asset Allocation" from Attilio Meucci.


Also a list of interesting course to consider on topic

  1. Explore the elements of Quantamental #investing with Dan Duggan, Senior Data Scientist at Goldman Sachs and discover how employing multiple models in your security selection process will improve predictive accuracy. Link: https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/artificial-intelligence-%26-big-data---financial-markets_ai-data-science-in-trading-activity-6775081004009828352-oalU
  2.  "Forward Rates and Expected Rates are NOT the same" Link: https://www.coursera.org/lecture/money-banking/forward-rates-are-not-expected-spot-rates-3J2v1
  3. Finally, a introduction to interesting field of economics called complexity economics. There are a lot of good resources available on topic of complexity economics. Here is my favorite primer: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-020-00273-3.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=d02124d2-c19e-4801-b3a8-e0a85736594b

Would love to hear your thoughts on our progress to date.

All the best G


Scott Jarred, CFP?

CEO of Invst | Making Money Work For People

3 年

Excellent info. Thanks for sharing, I will take some time to check this all out in depth.

HARMONY LEI Zhou

Senior Multi-Asset Class Risk Specialist

3 年

Thanks for sharing, Gareth! This reminds me of Ergodicity in economics by Ole Peters which may be of interest! https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-019-0732-0

Sahand Haji Ali Ahmad, PhD

Systematic Trader (Quant-Algo)

3 年

If they worked all the time, who would leave cash in the bank anymore?

David McIntosh

Managing Director - BlueFire AI - Neuro-symbolic AI

3 年

You've been busy Gareth Nicholson, interesting work and as you'll likely expect our experience plays to the more-is-more model in terms of data and models, the catch being to isolate the signal from the noise...not a trivial process indeed. Will follow the group,let me know if I can be of use in the risk discussion..

Gareth Nicholson

Chief Investment Officer (CIO) and Head of Managed Investments for Nomura International Wealth Management

3 年

Link to our group: Project Exploring Modern TAA https://www.dhirubhai.net/groups/13947926

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了