Use a Capability-Focused Approach — Not an Agile Framework
Cliff Berg
![Cliff Berg]()
Cliff Berg
Co-Founder and Managing Partner, Agile 2 Academy; Executive level Agile and DevOps advisor and consultant; Lead author of Agile 2: The Next Iteration of Agile
Article here: https://www.agile2academy.com/agile-2-academy-blog/use-a-capability-focused-approach-not-an-agile-framework
It's there because we would prefer that our followers follow us directly, instead of LinkedIn. LinkedIn wants to own all of our followers. If you go to the sites of authors and sign up there, you can help to break LinkedIn's control.
Hmm are they as mutually exclusive as you suggest?
PMI - PMP? | CSPO? | CSM? | ISO9000:2015 Lead Auditor | Certified Lean 6 Sigma Black Belt | ASQ Reliability Engineer | Jonah Program | ACLPv2.0 Adult Education Trainer |
1 个月Very insightful, I like the emphasis on the fixed key milestones and the focus on the capabilities. I believe this is a very viable framework.
Strategic Consulting Leader & Transformation Champion | Expert in Multi-Million Dollar Program Management | Drives Growth & Innovation in Fortune 500 & Government Sectors | Proven Record in Global Business Development
1 个月Cliff - I liked the article and agree with your approach having lived the goat rodeos of sprints and the we missed targets/what are we getting questions - I think a key point to call out is that "Value" is only realized at the capability level - our customers (internal specifically) only really care when they have a new capability to leverage - a sprint view does them no good - I think "business leadership" usually gets this idea but many of the other layers don't focus on the value because they are being pressed to hit sprint/stories/test case goals - just my 2 cents