??? Is the US looking to break up Google? | ?????? A Ukrainian national is to blame for the Nord Stream sabotage

??? Is the US looking to break up Google? | ?????? A Ukrainian national is to blame for the Nord Stream sabotage


Have you checked out our YouTube and Instagram channels yet? Follow us to get the same sharp analyses you love, on your social media.


Market Watch

  • Indian benchmark indices ended the day in the green with the Sensex up 149.85 points at 79,105.88, and the Nifty up 4.75 points at 24,143.75.
  • Among sectoral indices, Nifty IT gained the most, while Nifty Metal shed the most.


Is the US looking to break up Google?

The US Department of Justice is planning a rare antitrust action against Google, which could result in the tech giant being broken up.?The DOJ is contemplating breaking up Google following a court ruling that found the company had monopolized the online search market.

The details: Potential divestments include the Android operating system and Chrome browser, which are critical to Google's market dominance.

  • Another potential action includes forcing Google to sell its AdWords platform, a major revenue source, generating about two-thirds of its revenue.
  • Alternatively, the DOJ may also mandate Google to share more data with competitors, such as Microsoft's Bing and DuckDuckGo, to level the playing field.
  • Exclusive contracts that make Google the default search engine on devices, a significant part of the DOJ's case, might be banned to restore competition.

First, it is not certain that this is the course of action that the DOJ would take. It is merely one of the options being considered.

  • However, this is not unheard of. In the 1998 case of United States v. Microsoft Corp , the US DOJ accused Microsoft of maintaining a monopoly in the PC operating systems market and engaging in anti-competitive practices by bundling its Internet Explorer web browser with Windows OS.
  • In 2000, Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled that Microsoft had indeed violated antitrust laws (Sec 2 of the Sherman Act) and ordered the company to be broken up into two separate entities: one to handle the Windows operating system and another to manage other software components.
  • However, Microsoft appealed the decision, and in 2001, a federal appeals court overturned the breakup order, while still upholding the finding that Microsoft had abused its monopoly power.
  • Ultimately, the DOJ decided to settle with Microsoft, requiring Microsoft to share its APIs with third-party companies and imposing other restrictions to prevent anti-competitive practices, but it did not require the company to be split into separate entities.

What is the Google case? The verdict against Google was delivered by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta who found that Google violated U.S. antitrust laws by maintaining an illegal monopoly in the search and advertising markets.

  • Specifically, Judge Mehta determined that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
  • The case focused on these issues: Google used its monopoly power to charge supra-competitive prices for general search text ads, thereby earning monopoly profits; Google signed exclusive distribution agreements with companies like Apple and Samsung, ensuring that Google's search engine was the default on their devices.


Clip du jour

Shots fired: Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt saying WFH is the reason Google is losing to OpenAI.


Hi, I’m Gaurav Jeyaraman, the editor of this newsletter. We’d like to hear some feedback on our newsletter: what works and what doesn’t work? WhatsApp me directly and tell me what you think.


It wasn’t the Russians? Germany issues arrest warrant against Ukrainian national

German authorities have issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian national in connection with the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines .

Wait, what’s Nord Stream? Nord Streams 1 and 2 comprise 2 pipelines each. Nord Stream 1 (operational from 2011) provided Germany and much of Europe with cheap natural gas from Russia for over 10 years. Nord Stream 2 was due to begin operations last year.


Channel 4

  • Russia built the pipelines as it “bypassed any need to transit Ukraine” for gas supplies to Europe. It also worked in favour of the Germans who got direct access to cheap Russian gas and were also able to export this to other European nations.

  • The company Nord Stream AG which operates the pipeline is owned by Russia’s state-run Gazprom (51%) and four European energy firms (collectively 49%) that had the right to control downstream sales to European distributors.
  • The pipelines, which were essential to Russia’s gas revenues, and to Europe’s energy needs were destroyed in September 2022.

The investigations: Russia was initially cited as the likely perpetrator of the Nord Stream attack. However, no one explained why Russia would destroy the biggest leverage it had over Europe amid the Ukraine war.


  • The German investigation revealed that Volodymyr Z. and accomplices used a yacht to reach the pipeline location, where two suspects deployed underwater to plant explosives.
  • Poland did not honor the European arrest warrant within the required 60 days, leading to speculations about tacit approval of the attack.

Yes, but: No direct links between the suspects and the Ukrainian government have been found, while the other suspects deny involvement.

Why this matters: Ukraine has blamed Russia multiple times for infrastructure damage in the country.

  • Russia had always maintained that Ukraine was involved in the Nordstream sabotage.?
  • Earlier, a senior Ukrainian military officer Roman Chervinsky was named as the coordinator of the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage operation, as reported by?The Washington Post . Previous reports also?linked the US and other Western nations to being involved in the sabotage.


ICYMI



要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了