US Government Efficiency Failure - Transparency and Accountability
This Asset Management Partnership (AMP) Newsletter continues a miniseries that covers how the US Government is failing to manage its built infrastructure and how this problem can be solved.
See preceding articles at:
This article concludes a litany of the US Government’s fiduciary failure to efficiently and effectively manage its built infrastructure that consumes around $70 billion in funding each year. The focus of this week’s article is a capstone perspective on decision making transparency and accountability. The preceding articles listed above identify specific failure root causes as follows:
This leads to the culminating failure of the US Government not being transparent nor holding itself accountable for fulfillment of its fiduciary responsibility to effectively and efficiently manage its vast built infrastructure portfolio.
Much of this is a failure of ignorance and omission. It is also a failure of leadership. Ignorance stems from Federal Agencies not understanding the difference between “managing assets” and “asset management”. See Managing Assets in the Context of Asset Management and the Asset Management Paradox for more on this topic. This leads to the failure of omission. If you don’t know it’s a thing, how can you be accountable for not doing it…? Finally, this leads to a failure in leadership. If you are in a leadership position and have a job to do that is dependent on assets and the care of these assets, you should be able answer the question: “Am I doing this well?”. If you cannot immediately answer this question in an effective, efficient manner you have failed the test.
The National Academies’ Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities focuses exactly on the US Federal government’s transparency and accountability fulfilling its fiduciary responsibility to effectively and efficiently manage its built infrastructure portfolio. This report makes this point clear through use of the word “fiduciary”. You can download this report for free at the link above. Do so and search for the word “fiduciary”. It is used 15 times in the context of making two points:
Current US Government policy does not do this. This is a failure. This failure can be seen as a tragedy of the commons, but its ultimate source is the US Congress. The 5 recommendations contained in the National Academies’ Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities define a pathway to rectify this failure.
领英推荐
Implementation of these recommendations can be accomplished through a simple addendum to the Federal Property Reform Act of 2016. This addendum would be to direct the Federal Real Property Council to implement the five recommendations contained in Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities, or to report to Congress within one-year legislative barriers or impediments on its inability to do so. These five recommendations, stated as requirements, are summarized below:
Of special note, these recommendations, consistent with the National Academies’ Strategy to Renew Federal Facilities, do not recommend that the US Government or its Agencies be ISO 55001 certified, unless there is a specific business reason and benefit to do so. The recommendation is that the ISO 55000 Asset Management Standards series be used as a timeless, independent, objective statement of best practice for the effective and efficient built infrastructure management.
The balance of this miniseries will further develop each recommendation outlined above. In the meantime, have a Happy Holidays and I look forward to reconnecting in the New Year.
If you found this post helpful please like and repost it. The way to fix the problem of the US Government’s fiduciary failure in managing its built infrastructure portfolio is to help more people understand the problem. Also, check out the AMP Newsletter for more on disciplined asset management.
Written by Jack Dempsey | December 24, 2024
AMP Newsletter #103
Copyright ? 2024, Asset Management Partnership LLC. All Rights Reserved.