The US GDP Distributed Equally
https://visualizingeconomics.com/blog/2011/03/08/long-term-real-growth-in-us-gdp-per-capita-1871-2009

The US GDP Distributed Equally

Forget Bitcoin. Sam Altman asks: Why not share the entire US economy equally with all citizens?

Money Quote Tuesday Nov. 28 2017

There is So. Much. To. Read! So here are some of the more noteworthy stories I’ve been reading these past two days:

American Equity (blog.samaltman.com)

Sam Altman explores an idea with historical roots but radical implications. Money quote: “Countries that concentrate wealth in a small number of families do worse over the long term — if we don’t take a radical step toward a fair, inclusive system, we will not be the leading country in the world for much longer. This would harm all Americans more than most realize.”

Most Big Private Tech Firms Fall Far Short on Governance (The information)

I wrote extensively on this today here. Money quote: ““Despite their enormous size and influence, the biggest privately held technology companies eschew some basic corporate governance standards, blocking outside voices, limiting decision making to small groups of mostly white men and holding back on public disclosures.”

As Bitcoin Scrapes $10,000, an Investment Boom Like No Other (New York Times)

I own a small number of bitcoins and other crypto currencies. I bought them to understand them. Now I am flummoxed by what to do with them. Hold? Sell? Cover? Ignore? I honestly have no idea. Does anyone? Money quote: “But current investors see that after all the previous popped bubbles — and there have been several — the price eventually returned to its old high and then vaulted past it. The price of a Bitcoin is now more than seven times the high it reached in 2013.”

The big Washington food fight (Politico)

About time the voice of the consumer, and transparency in labeling, started to impact behemoth lobbying vehicles. Money quote: “When the Food and Drug Administration unveiled its update for the Nutrition Facts label in 2014 with a new requirement to list “added sugars” for the first time, plenty of food companies were furious, arguing that it wasn’t based in science and would confuse consumers. But others, including Nestlé and Mars, accepted the idea, concluding it was what consumers wanted or would be good for their business, or both…GMA’s members were so divided over the policy that the association submitted split comments to the regulator, with minority and majority opinions that argued the pros and cons of added sugars labeling, a public division that no one could recall happening in the past.”

Has the Silicon Valley Hype Cycle Finally Run Its Course? (Vanity Fair)

Short answer (according to VF): Yes. Money quote: “The shift is being driven, in part, by a newfound focus on revenue over scale. For years, the private market shielded tech companies from painful reckonings with the deficiencies in their business models. The venture-capital boom and the optimism of the early and mid 2010s led to the creation of more than 100 privately held tech companies valued at $1 billion or more. Now some of the biggest, like Uber, are facing questions not only about their business models but also about their company culture.”

The Platform Economy by Anne-Marie Slaughter & Aubrey Hruby — Project Syndicate (Project-Syndicate.Org)

Good “out of the bubble” read on the “rest of the world” as it relates to issues we often obsess over. Money quote: “Emerging markets also offer a cautionary tale concerning the downside of the on-demand economy. They have some of the highest levels of inequality in the world. The world’s 50 most unequal economies are in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, with South Africa taking the prize for the highest income inequality.”

New evidence suggests sugar industry hid studies linking sugar to major diseases (Independent)

A very old, but very telling, smoking gun. Money quote: “When it seemed to be pointing to the fact that sucrose consumption could be linked to heart disease and bladder cancer, the SRF (which had changed its name in 1968 to the International Sugar Research Foundation, or ISRF) ended the project and didn’t publish the results.”

Meet the GOP Senate candidate taking on Google (Axios)

The Missouri AG is making a national name for himself. Money quote: “It is our firm belief and, I think, Google’s too, that no company in the history of the world has collected more personal information about its users than Google has, so beginning there, I think, makes a good deal of sense. That said, I do hope that one of the effects of our effort will be to spark a broad conversation about just how much personal data a consumer is expected to trade in order to interact with these internet-based platforms.”

Opinion | Cops, Cellphones and Privacy at the Supreme Court (New York Times)

This case is seminal. Or could be, anyway. Money quote: “The harder question is: What rules should govern the relationship between law enforcement and the public, and who should write them? Even if the Supreme Court decides, as it ought to, that the police needed a warrant to vacuum up four months of Mr. Carpenter’s whereabouts, it can’t resolve more fine-grained questions about how to balance personal privacy against public safety…That’s a job for lawmakers.”

This Is Why WeWork is Buying Meetup | Backchannel (Wired)

My take? Because WeWork’s way better than Facebook as a home for MeetUp. Just my take. Money quote: “Inadvertently, Meetup’s contrarian approach to melding the physical and the digital may house the solution to this problem of emotional and intellectual disconnect that everyone is racing to solve.”

SoftBank will try to buy shares of Uber at a 30 percent discount (Recode)

“Try” is the operative word here. Money quote: “Several investors have said privately that they would be unlikely to sell at such a rate.” But then again, $48 billion is nothing to sniff at.

Sign up to John Battelle's Newsletters.

https://forum.newco.co/?utm_source=Medium&utm_medium=Banner%204


well it is possible even in the 21st century, if only policy makers were not highly influenced by big businesses with their private interests.

回复
Dr. Chris Donegan

Sceptical Empiricist.

7 年

This happened in Eastern Europe following the fall of the Berlin Wall. I was there and saw it. The voucher privatisation system did precisely this. What happened? The vouchers were quickly sold and accumulated by aggregators who understood the value of them and consolidated their position. The average owner was happy with what they saw as free money. Something similar happened with Mrs Thatcher’s attempt to democratise share ownership in the U.K.. almost everyone flipped the Stock for a quick profit. In other words ironically this level of participation inverts capitalism for a short period and then reverts to the norm. Human nature wins.

Jennifer Coggins-Kraus

ORACLE PeopleSoft & JDE HCM Consulting at Coggins Technical Associates - Contact 404-902-1843 Email: [email protected]

7 年

Wow!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Battelle的更多文章

  • When Did Tech Stop Being Magical?

    When Did Tech Stop Being Magical?

    I’ve been pondering something for a while now, but have held off “thinking out loud” about it because I was worried I…

    11 条评论
  • What Are You Reading, and How?

    What Are You Reading, and How?

    Nearly every conversation I've had over the past month has involved some variation of this question: What are you…

    3 条评论
  • Tech Has Replaced Finance As Too Big Too Fail

    Tech Has Replaced Finance As Too Big Too Fail

    I opened my annual predictions last week by noting that the technology industry had leapfrogged finance as the most…

    2 条评论
  • 2025: The Year of the Big Tech Flex

    2025: The Year of the Big Tech Flex

    This isn't going to be a normal year. 2025 will be strange, frenetic, and full of surprises, particularly for those of…

    7 条评论
  • Grading My 2024 Predictions

    Grading My 2024 Predictions

    2024 is in the books, so it’s time to grade my own homework. One year ago I posted my 2024 predictions, fresh off a…

    3 条评论
  • Bluesky Is Getting Big. Does That Mean Advertising Is Coming? (Yep).

    Bluesky Is Getting Big. Does That Mean Advertising Is Coming? (Yep).

    I’ve been in the business of making new kinds of media companies, media platforms, and media technologies since before…

    2 条评论
  • Generative AI Won't Work ... Unless We Change Our Approach

    Generative AI Won't Work ... Unless We Change Our Approach

    Listen up, tech oligarchs; lend an ear, simpering brohanions. We’re doing this generative AI thing all wrong, and if…

    2 条评论
  • Why BlueSky Is Taking Off

    Why BlueSky Is Taking Off

    Emily Liu at Bluesky has a timely post that I'd like to respond to. (Back in the day, when blogging was a thing, we did…

    5 条评论
  • It's Not About Brand Safety, It's About Blackmail.

    It's Not About Brand Safety, It's About Blackmail.

    If you want to understand where the zeitgeist is headed in Silicon Valley, you have to study The Information, the…

    12 条评论
  • DOC - The First Chapter

    DOC - The First Chapter

    More than 200 eclectic, incisive, and peripatetically curious folks gathered last week, bound by the pursuit of Truth…

    19 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了