Updated SaaS M&A multiples through June

Updated SaaS M&A multiples through June

Alongside multiples of publicly traded SaaS companies, public SaaS acquisitions are some of the most relevant you can look at for deriving SaaS revenue multiples.? These transactions are all cash, the financials are public and audited, and these are all control transactions so the data is about as pure as it gets.? Below is the data for all public SaaS company acquisitions since 2021, including the latest acquisitions of WalkMe and Powerschool.

?


39 acquisitions.? ?39 public companies have been acquired since December 2020.? Of note, we would consider 8 of those acquisitions to be distressed (a combination of slow growth, poor margin, and weak multiple), so when looking at consolidated multiples, we separate the distressed transactions which are highlighted in red, from the good acquisitions.? The rest of this blog will talk about the data excluding the distressed transactions.?

?

Capped price.? The median acquisition price of these companies was $6.4bln.? There are only so many acquirers that can spend billions in cash and/or company stock to make acquisitions.? Once you get to $5bln+ in valuation, the universe of corporate acquirers (Salesforce, Microsoft, Adobe) and private equity firms (Thoma Bravo, KKR, Vista, Clearlake, Fracnsico, Symphony) that can afford you shrinks, such that IPO becomes the primary viable option. ??And of course, SaaS IPO’s have become rare: there were 40 in 2021 but only three (Klaviyo, Rubrik, Waystar) since January 2022.?

?

8.9x median and 10.1x average.? The businesses on median sold for 8.9x trailing twelve month revenue of $786mm with YOY growth of 20%.? While that growth may sound low, it’s impressive for companies with nearly $1bln of revenue, so any multiple discount from slower growth should be offset by the premium these companies receive for size and the fact that these are control investments. ?

?

No burn.? These companies don’t burn, but they also weren’t wildly profitable.? On median, EBITDA margin was 0%.? Profitability isn’t a requirement to get acquired, and these acquisitions fly in the face of “Rule of 40”, which in our view is just a lazy saying.? The above shows it’s more like the ‘Rule of 17’. ??????

?

Private equity is leading the way.? Of the acquisitions shown, only 12 were made by a strategic.? All the rest were made by private equity, with Thoma Bravo making 9 of the acquisitions. ?Again, there are very few firms that can afford a multi-billion dollar acquisition.? Not surprisingly, the highest multiple of the group is Salesforce’s, paying 33x revenue for Slack.?

?

Thank you for reading.? Visit blossomstreetventures.com for more SaaS metrics and blogs.? Email the author at [email protected]


Swetaa Dhuliya

Build Your Authority and Influence on LinkedIn | Designed for Founders, Leaders and Professionals

3 个月

Understanding the updated SaaS M&A multiples is crucial for SaaS revenue projections. Your expertise in analyzing public SaaS acquisitions adds significant value to the SaaS industry. Great insights shared Sammy Abdullah

回复
Zeeshan Ali

Founder and CEO Lead Genius | Fractional BDO | 150+ satisfied clients and growing | specializing in Business Development as a Service. Expert in Lead Generation and Digital Marketing for the B2B Market

4 个月

Great insights on the updated SaaS M&A multiples, Sammy! Always appreciate your detailed updates. How do you see these trends impacting B2B lead generation strategies?

回复
Zeeshan Ali

Founder and CEO Lead Genius | Fractional BDO | 150+ satisfied clients and growing | specializing in Business Development as a Service. Expert in Lead Generation and Digital Marketing for the B2B Market

4 个月

Interesting insights, Sammy Abdullah! It's fascinating to see how SaaS M&A multiples have evolved through June. This data is crucial for understanding market trends and strategizing future moves. Thanks for sharing this valuable information!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了