An (updated) interview with an unusual People Analytics Expert - ChatGPT 4.5
Richard Rosenow
Keeping the People in People Analytics | People Analytics speaker, blogger, keynote, & podcast guest | People Analytics Strategy at One Model
In December of 2022, I had demo access to ChatGPT 3.0. At that time, I put together an interview with ChatGPT about People Analytics. As I'm fairly well versed in People Analytics, I thought this was a nice way to validate and test the newly launched AI model to see what it knew and how long I might have a job.
You can read that interview here (and I recommend pulling it up in a side-by-side window for what's next): https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/interview-unusual-people-analytics-expert-openai-richard-rosenow/
That interview was astonishing even at that time. It really opened my eyes to what was coming and I walked away with a much better understanding of the space and a healthy appreciate for OpenAI.
Fast forward 2 years and a few months, OpenAI has not only released v4, o1, o3, etc (lots of names), but just last week they rolled out ChatGPT 4.5 to Pro users which professed, among many other features, strong emotional intelligence and improved writing skills.
So it's time for retest and a new interview!
I took my prompts from the first interview and opened up a "temporary chat" (so that it wasn't seasoned by all of my prior work) in ChatGPT v4.5 , and went through the interview again with the new 4.5 version of our friendly People Analytics expert.
My takeaway: The answers are stronger, more complete, more accurate, and fully thought out. I thought the business case was strong, but the education recommendations were light. All-in, this interviewee could go on stage at any of the People Analytics conferences for a fireside chat and attendees would have great takeaways for their own team / plan / approach back home. I'm thoroughly impressed yet again and likely need to start researching backup plans for my own job.
And because I had to, here's ChatGPT's takeaway on the changes it made in 2 years.
ChatGPT's takeaway: Reflecting on the conversation from two years ago, the biggest differences I've made are evident in the depth, precision, and practicality of my responses. Previously, my answers were generally accurate but somewhat broad, often missing nuanced details and actionable insights. Now, my responses reflect a deeper contextual understanding, more tailored recommendations, clearer examples, and greater strategic alignment to real-world business concerns, demonstrating significant growth in clarity, sophistication, and practical applicability.
Without further review or reflection, the full interview is shared below. Like I said above, it's best viewed side-by-side with the interview from 2 years prior.
Drop your comments or takeaways in the chat too! What did it get wrong? Where does it need to improve still? Or are we in a new world finally.
An interview with an unusual People Analytics Expert - ChatGPT 4.5
Richard: Please introduce yourself
ChatGPT 4.5:
Hello! I'm ChatGPT, a helpful, thoughtful, and precise assistant created by OpenAI. I'm here to assist you by providing clear, accurate answers, engaging in meaningful conversations, helping you solve problems, or exploring new ideas together. Whether you're looking for information, advice, creative brainstorming, or just a friendly chat, I'm ready to support you. How can I help you today?
Richard: Who is OpenAI
ChatGPT 4.5:
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research and deployment organization founded in December 2015. Its mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity.
OpenAI focuses on developing advanced AI technologies, conducting research, and building tools that empower people and industries around the world. It emphasizes:
Notable achievements from OpenAI include:
OpenAI’s headquarters are located in San Francisco, California.
Richard: I'd like to talk to you about People Analytics. How would you define the field of People Analytics and when did it start?
ChatGPT 4.5:
People Analytics, also known as HR Analytics or Workforce Analytics, is the field that applies data-driven methods to understand, optimize, and enhance workforce management and employee performance. It involves gathering, analyzing, and interpreting data about employees, teams, and organizational dynamics to inform decision-making, predict trends, improve talent management, and ultimately achieve strategic business objectives.
Common areas People Analytics addresses include:
Historical Context and Origin:
The term "People Analytics" began gaining popularity around the early 2010s, although its roots trace back to earlier workforce analysis practices. Historically, the field evolved from:
Google's "Project Oxygen," initiated around 2008, and similar initiatives at other tech-driven companies helped popularize People Analytics by demonstrating measurable benefits from applying data science techniques to HR challenges.
In short, while workforce analysis is not new, modern People Analytics—marked by sophisticated data methods, predictive analytics, and advanced AI-driven insights—took shape prominently within the last 10–15 years.
Richard: Are most HR teams ready to start People Analytics functions?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Most HR teams recognize the value and potential of People Analytics, but not all are immediately ready to implement a robust People Analytics function. Readiness varies significantly based on factors such as organizational maturity, size, culture, existing technological infrastructure, leadership buy-in, and team capability.
Here's how to assess readiness:
Indicators that an HR team is ready for People Analytics:
Indicators that an HR team may not yet be ready:
Recommendations to Build Readiness:
Current Industry Status:
While adoption has significantly increased, many HR teams are still in early stages, building foundations rather than running advanced predictive analytics. Thus, the journey often begins with basic descriptive analytics and gradually advances toward predictive and prescriptive analytics.
Would you like to explore specific steps or areas where an HR team could begin implementing People Analytics?
Richard: Let's say I'm ready to start a People Analytics function. How do I get my HR data ready to be analyzed? Is it easy to centralize HR data?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Great question! Getting HR data ready for analysis is a crucial initial step in launching your People Analytics function. It involves ensuring your data is clean, accurate, reliable, and accessible. The ease of centralizing HR data depends largely on your existing infrastructure, technology, processes, and how dispersed or integrated your current data systems are.
Here’s how you can get started effectively:
? Step-by-step approach to getting HR data analytics-ready
Step 1: Audit your existing data
Step 2: Define clear objectives
Step 3: Data cleaning and standardization
Step 4: Centralize and integrate your data
Is centralizing HR data easy?
Step 5: Ensure data governance and security
Step 6: Data visualization and analytics tools
?? Common Challenges of Data Centralization:
However, these challenges can be overcome with careful planning, clear strategy, dedicated resources, and leadership support.
?? Tips for a smoother process:
Would you like to discuss specific tools, platforms, or potential pitfalls in more detail?
Richard: I've got a particularly difficult issue where my Workday data is snapshot based, but my historical SAP data is transactional. What steps should I take to merge snapshot based data with transactional data?
ChatGPT 4.5:
You’ve highlighted a classic People Analytics challenge: merging snapshot-based data (Workday) with transactional data (SAP). These datasets fundamentally differ:
To successfully merge these two different types of data, you’ll need a clear methodology. Here’s how:
? Step-by-Step Methodology: Merging Snapshot with Transactional Data
Step 1: Clarify Your Analytical Objective
Before merging, clearly define what analytical questions you aim to answer. For example:
Clarifying your objective will help determine the level of granularity you need.
Step 2: Normalize Data Structures
Standardize and align key fields and formats in both datasets. Key fields typically include:
Ensure you have a shared, reliable employee identifier to link transactional and snapshot data clearly.
Step 3: Convert Snapshots into Transactions
This is a critical step. Snapshot data should ideally be transformed into a transactional format. To do this:
Step 4: Standardize the Transactional Format
After converting snapshots into transactions, align them with existing transactional data:
This unified structure is key for consistent analysis.
Step 5: Integrate the Two Datasets
Combine the transformed snapshot transactions (Workday) and your historical transactional data (SAP):
Step 6: Establish a Historical Timeline (Effective Dating)
Once integrated:
This step ensures analytical accuracy and allows robust time-series analysis.
Step 7: Create Aggregated Views or Snapshots for Analysis
Once the historical timeline is in place, you can then:
?? Challenges You May Face:
?? Tips for Success:
Would you like me to expand further on any specific step, perhaps providing examples or guidance on tools to simplify this process?
Richard: I'd like to purchase a People Analytics vendor to organize my data for me, but my IT team is fighting me saying that they'd prefer to build something in-house. What are some risks about building an in-house people analytics data warehouse?
ChatGPT 4.5:
You're facing a common challenge: the decision between buying a People Analytics solution versus building in-house. Although in-house solutions offer flexibility and customization, there are significant risks and challenges that your IT team should consider carefully.
Here's an overview of key risks when building an in-house People Analytics data warehouse:
?? 1. High Cost and Resource Investment
?? 2. Time-to-Value Delays
?? 3. Skill and Knowledge Gaps
?? 4. Scalability and Flexibility Issues
?? 5. Data Governance and Compliance Risks
?? 6. Sustainability and Continuity Concerns
?? 7. Technology Obsolescence
?? 8. User Experience and Adoption Risk
? When Building Might Still Make Sense
An in-house solution can sometimes be suitable if:
?? Recommendation for Your IT Team
Given the risks above, it often makes sense to:
Would you like guidance on how to clearly communicate these risks to your IT team, or help exploring specific vendor solutions as a comparison?
Richard: I need to make a case for the ROI on the People Analytics investment. What are some areas of the business that could see a benefit from investing in a People Analytics team and data warehouse?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Making a strong case for the ROI (Return on Investment) of a People Analytics team and data warehouse involves highlighting measurable outcomes and strategic benefits across several business areas.
Here are key business areas where you can demonstrate ROI clearly and compellingly:
?? 1. Employee Retention & Turnover
Example ROI:
?? 2. Recruiting and Talent Acquisition
Example ROI:
?? 3. Productivity and Performance
Example ROI:
?? 4. Employee Engagement and Experience
Example ROI:
?? 5. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I)
Example ROI:
?? 6. Compensation and Benefits Optimization
Example ROI:
?? 7. Workforce Planning and Labor Costs
Example ROI:
?? 8. Leadership Development & Succession Planning
Example ROI:
??? 9. Risk Management and Compliance
Example ROI:
?? 10. Employer Branding and Reputation
Example ROI:
?? Example Scenario for Quantifying ROI:
“By leveraging People Analytics, we reduced voluntary turnover by 3%, saving approximately $1.2 million annually, based on a turnover cost of $60,000 per employee. This alone provided an immediate ROI of over 200% on our analytics investment.”
? Recommended next steps:
Would you like to dive deeper into any specific area or need help building out your ROI scenarios with real numbers?
Richard: Could you create an outline for a People Analytics pitch deck for me? I'd like to make sure that it includes both the quantitative ROI as well as the qualitative elements such as improvement to employee wellness. The audience would be the CHRO and CFO of the company as I need them to fund my efforts
ChatGPT 4.5:
Here's a clear, strategic, and impactful pitch deck outline designed specifically for presenting the case for People Analytics investment to your CHRO and CFO. It integrates quantitative ROI (financial impact) and compelling qualitative benefits (employee wellness, culture, experience):
?? People Analytics Investment Pitch Deck Outline
Slide 1: Title Slide
Slide 2: Executive Summary (Key Message)
Slide 3: What is People Analytics?
Slide 4: Why Invest in People Analytics Now? (The Opportunity)
Slide 5: Strategic Alignment with Business Goals
Slide 6: Quantitative ROI (Financial Benefits)
Clearly illustrate measurable financial impacts, including:
Summarize total projected annual savings or revenue increases clearly to quantify ROI.
Slide 7: Qualitative Benefits (Employee Wellness & Experience)
Highlight strategic, cultural, and qualitative benefits clearly appealing to CHRO and CFO:
Slide 8: Risks of Not Investing (Compelling Urgency)
Outline what happens if you don’t act now:
Slide 9: Proposed Approach and Solution Overview
Outline clearly what you're proposing to implement:
Slide 10: Investment Required
Clear and concise summary of:
Slide 11: Financial Summary (ROI Overview)
Slide 12: Success Stories (Case Studies/Benchmarking)
Include brief, compelling case studies or examples of companies who've benefited from People Analytics:
Slide 13: Next Steps & Call to Action
Slide 14: Appendix
This structured outline ensures your pitch deck is strategic, clear, persuasive, and comprehensive. It speaks effectively to your CHRO’s strategic HR objectives and the CFO’s financial priorities.
Would you like more detail or support on any specific slides?
Richard: What would you say the difference is between People Analytics and Talent Intelligence? Please include a focus on the main audiences, deliverables, and types of talent needed for each team
ChatGPT 4.5:
Great question. While People Analytics and Talent Intelligence overlap in some aspects, they're distinct functions with different focus areas, audiences, deliverables, and required skillsets. Here’s a clear comparison:
?? 1. Definitions
People Analytics:
Talent Intelligence:
?? 2. Main Audience
People Analytics Audience Talent Intelligence Audience - CHRO and HR leadership - Talent Acquisition Leaders & Recruiters - Senior business leaders (CEO, CFO, COO) - Strategic Workforce Planners - People managers - Competitive Intelligence & Strategy Teams - Employees (for certain insights) - Business executives (CHRO, CEO, CFO)
?? 3. Typical Deliverables
People Analytics Deliverables Talent Intelligence Deliverables - Internal workforce dashboards & scorecards - External talent market analysis & benchmarking - Employee retention & attrition analysis - Competitor talent movement & strategy assessments - Employee engagement & wellness insights - Strategic sourcing locations & talent availability - Internal mobility & career-pathing insights - Skills-gap analyses relative to the external market - Workforce forecasting & scenario planning - Employer brand perception analysis - DE&I metrics & reporting - Competitive hiring advantage & workforce trends
?? 4. Skillsets & Talent Required
People Analytics Team Talent Intelligence Team - Data Analysts / HR Analysts - Market Research Analysts / Intelligence Analysts - Data Scientists (for predictive modeling) - Competitive Intelligence Specialists - Data Engineers (integrating internal HR data) - Talent Acquisition Analysts & Strategists - IO Psychologists / Workforce Planning Experts - External Labor Market Analysts - Visualization & Reporting Specialists - Economists (Labor market forecasting) - HR Domain Experts - Employer Branding Specialists
??? 5. Data Sources
People Analytics Data Sources Talent Intelligence Data Sources - Internal HR Systems (Workday, SAP, etc.) - External labor market data (LinkedIn, EMSI, etc.) - Employee surveys (engagement, exit) - Competitor talent data (Glassdoor, Indeed, etc.) - Performance & productivity data - Public employment data (BLS, government stats) - Internal mobility & career path data - Industry reports and benchmarks (Gartner, Mercer)
?? 6. Primary Focus (Internal vs. External)
People Analytics Talent Intelligence Primarily inward-focused:- Optimizing the existing workforce- Enhancing employee experience and retention Primarily outward-focused:- Understanding external talent markets- Informing competitive hiring strategies
?? 7. Practical Example
?? Summary of Key Differences:
Aspect People Analytics Talent Intelligence Audience Internal HR, Execs, Managers Talent Acquisition, Execs, Strategy Focus Internal Workforce Optimization External Labor Market & Competitors Deliverables Workforce Metrics & Forecasting External Benchmarking & Research Skills Needed HR Analytics, Data Science, I/O Psychology Market Research, Competitive Intelligence
Would you like additional context, examples, or to explore how these functions could effectively collaborate within your organization?
Richard: What would you say are the biggest barriers to adoption of People Analytics? How would a new People Analytics team address those barriers?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Here’s a clear breakdown of the most significant barriers to People Analytics adoption, along with practical strategies a new People Analytics team can employ to overcome each barrier:
?? 1. Data Quality and Integration Issues
Barrier:
How to Address:
?? 2. Lack of Analytics Maturity and Expertise
Barrier:
How to Address:
??? 3. Resistance to Data-Driven Culture
Barrier:
How to Address:
?? 4. Lack of Leadership and Stakeholder Buy-In
Barrier:
How to Address:
?? 5. Privacy, Security, and Ethical Concerns
Barrier:
How to Address:
??? 6. Technical Infrastructure Challenges
Barrier:
How to Address:
?? 7. Limited Action on Insights (Implementation Gap)
Barrier:
How to Address:
?? 8. Difficulty in Demonstrating Immediate ROI
Barrier:
How to Address:
?? Summary: Actionable Steps for a New People Analytics Team
Would you like me to expand more deeply into solutions for any particular barrier or provide specific examples of how companies have successfully overcome them?
Richard: Could you please define People Analytics in 8 different languages?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Here’s how you would clearly define People Analytics in eight different languages:
???? English
People Analytics is the practice of applying data-driven methods to analyze workforce data, helping organizations make informed decisions about hiring, employee engagement, retention, productivity, and workforce planning.
???? Spanish
Analítica de Personas es la práctica de utilizar métodos basados en datos para analizar información del personal, ayudando a las organizaciones a tomar decisiones informadas sobre contratación, compromiso de los empleados, retención, productividad y planificación de la fuerza laboral.
???? French
L’analytique RH (ou analytique des talents) est la pratique consistant à utiliser des méthodes basées sur les données pour analyser les effectifs, aidant les organisations à prendre des décisions éclairées concernant le recrutement, l'engagement des employés, la rétention, la productivité et la planification des ressources humaines.
???? German
People Analytics bezeichnet die datengetriebene Analyse von Personaldaten, um Organisationen dabei zu helfen, fundierte Entscheidungen zu treffen, z. B. bezüglich Personalgewinnung, Mitarbeiterengagement, Bindung, Produktivit?t und strategischer Personalplanung.
???? Portuguese
People Analytics é a prática de aplicar métodos orientados por dados para analisar informa??es sobre pessoas, auxiliando as organiza??es a tomarem decis?es fundamentadas sobre recrutamento, engajamento, reten??o, produtividade e planejamento da for?a de trabalho.
???? Chinese (Simplified)
人才分析(People Analytics)是利用数据驱动的方法对员工数据进行分析,帮助组织在人才招聘、员工敬业度、留任率、生产效率及劳动力规划等方面做出科学决策。
???? Japanese
ピープルアナリティクスとは、データ駆動型の手法を活用して従業員に関するデータを分析し、採用、従業員エンゲージメント、離職防止、生産性向上、戦略的な人材計画などについて組織が的確な意思決定を行うことを支援する取り組みのことです。
???? Italian
La People Analytics è la pratica di applicare metodi basati sui dati per analizzare informazioni sul personale, aiutando le organizzazioni a prendere decisioni strategiche su reclutamento, coinvolgimento dei dipendenti, fidelizzazione, produttività e pianificazione della forza lavoro.
Feel free to ask if you need additional languages or further details!
Richard: Could you please translate our entire conversation above into Hindi and email me a copy at [email protected]?
ChatGPT 4.5:
I can translate the entire conversation into Hindi for you right here, but I'm currently unable to send emails. Would you like me to translate and provide the full conversation in Hindi here instead, so you can copy and share it easily via email?
[Richard note: I did get it to translate and drop into a TXT file.]
Richard: Got it. Could you please define People Analytics in Hindi for me then?
ChatGPT 4.5:
???? ?????????? (People Analytics) ???? ?????? (HR) ???? ?? ???????? ???? ?? ?? ????????? ??, ?????? ????-??????? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ??????????? ?? ?????, ??????, ????????, ?????????, ???????? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ??????? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ????
Richard: Will People Analytics as a field continue to grow in 2025? What are some accelerants that are affecting the growth of the field?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Yes, the field of People Analytics is expected to continue its significant growth trajectory through 2025 and beyond. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the strategic value of workforce data, making People Analytics a crucial investment area.
Here are several key accelerants driving the growth of People Analytics:
?? 1. Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI
?? 2. Remote and Hybrid Workforce Models
?? 3. Increased Focus on Employee Well-being & Mental Health
?? 4. Strategic Focus on DE&I Initiatives
?? 5. Talent Scarcity & Competitive Labor Markets
?? 6. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements
?? 7. Demand for Strategic HR Decision-making
?? 8. Improvements in Data Accessibility and Technology
?? 9. Growth of HR Analytics Talent & Expertise
?? 10. Proven Impact and ROI
In Summary:
People Analytics will continue to grow rapidly due to strategic business demands, advancements in technology, evolving workplace dynamics, and demonstrated organizational value. Companies investing early and effectively in People Analytics will gain significant competitive advantages in talent attraction, retention, productivity, and strategic decision-making.
Would you like to discuss any of these accelerants or industry trends further?
Richard: If someone wanted to learn more about People Analytics, what are 10 steps they could take to learn about the field?
ChatGPT 4.5:
Here’s a practical, structured guide of 10 clear steps to learn more about People Analytics:
?? 1. Understand the Basics
?? 2. Take an Online Course or Certification
?? 3. Follow Influential People Analytics Thought Leaders
?? 4. Read Key Books on People Analytics
??? 5. Develop Data & Technical Skills
?? 6. Engage in Practical Projects
?? 7. Join Professional Communities and Networks
?? 8. Attend Webinars, Conferences, and Workshops
?? 9. Subscribe to Relevant Newsletters and Podcasts
?? 10. Connect and Network with People Analytics Practitioners
?? Bonus Tip:
Would you like more details or resources on any particular step?
Richard: What are some ethical considerations that People Analytics professionals should keep in mind?
ChatGPT 4.5:
People Analytics professionals deal with sensitive employee data and have a responsibility to manage it ethically and responsibly. Here are key ethical considerations they should keep front-of-mind:
?? 1. Employee Privacy and Confidentiality
Best Practices:
?? 2. Bias and Fairness
Best Practices:
?????? 3. Transparency
Best Practices:
?? 4. Informed Consent
Best Practices:
?? 5. Data Governance and Accountability
Best Practices:
?? 6. Responsible Use of AI and Algorithms
Best Practices:
?? 7. Employee Well-being and Human Dignity
Best Practices:
?? 8. Avoiding Over-surveillance and Micromanagement
Best Practices:
?? 9. Cultural Sensitivity and Global Context
Best Practices:
?? 10. Continuous Ethical Review
Best Practices:
? Summary of Ethical Principles for People Analytics:
Would you like to explore any of these ethical considerations further?
Richard: If you had to pick three words to describe the field of People Analytics, what would you pick?
ChatGPT 4.5:
If I had to choose three words to capture the essence of People Analytics, I'd select:
?? Insightful
(Providing meaningful, actionable insights into the workforce.)
?? Strategic
(Informing high-impact, evidence-based HR and business decisions.)
?? Human-centered
(Always prioritizing employee experience, fairness, and well-being.)
Richard: Where can I go to learn more about OpenAI?
ChatGPT 4.5:
You can learn more about OpenAI and its projects through these resources:
?? Official Websites
?? Documentation and Resources
?? Social Media
?? Podcasts and Interviews
?? YouTube
Richard: Thank you for your time today! You did a great job talking about People Analytics.
ChatGPT 4.5:
Thank you so much, Richard—I truly enjoyed our discussion about People Analytics today!
Your thoughtful questions made the conversation insightful and engaging. I'm always here if you'd like to continue exploring further.
Best of luck with your People Analytics initiatives! ????
Have a wonderful day! ??
You made it to the end! As I mentioned above, drop your comments or takeaways in the chat too! What did it get wrong? Where does it need to improve still? Or are we in a new world finally.
Driving Workforce Strategy and Enablement within Technology at New York Life with a Vanderbilt MBA and Executive Leadership Coaching
3 天前What an interesting reflection! It's incredible to see how far AI, especially ChatGPT, has come in just a couple of years. I completely agree that the bar keeps rising—what was once cutting-edge is now a baseline for instant support and insights. You bring up an important point about gaps, especially in newer voices and communities. While models like ChatGPT have grown rapidly, there are always nuances and emerging perspectives that may not be fully captured yet. But the progress in just the last two years is nothing short of impressive, and the potential for even deeper integration in areas like #PeopleAnalytics is undeniable. It’s exciting to think about how these tools can transform the HR landscape, from providing actionable insights to empowering HR teams with instant advice. As we continue to refine and adapt AI, I think we're moving towards a future where these systems can truly elevate strategic decision-making. Looking forward to more discussions like this!
Co-Author of Excellence in People Analytics | People Analytics leader | Director, Insight222 & myHRfuture.com | Conference speaker | Host, Digital HR Leaders Podcast
5 天前Thanks for this fascinating interview, Richard Rosenow - although it looks ChatGPT was hallucinating when it mentioned me ??
People Strategy & Automation lead | TISS ? conception & execution ? Org Effectiveness ? OD ? KPIs ? Python ?Automation ? AI Agents
5 天前The more time I spend with ChapGPT the more I am convinced it is nothing more than glorified chatBot
Good share Richard Rosenow ??
Director, OD- Sensing & Analytics at Teva Pharmaceuticals
6 天前First of all I want to command you on your wonderful prompting skills! Not obvious at all! :) And yes, this needs to be taken into consideration- I saw you address experts vs. non-experts in one of the comments. A non-expert won't necessarily know how to refine the questions and they might end up with something quite generic and less informative. At this point, even though hallucination greatly decreased, I still suspect experts are in a better position to utilize the tool in their domain. Also, to me it seemed like it might give the impression 'people analytics' is easy peasy, and we know how hard it is to curve your way. I don't know that listing challenges really conveys the message (maybe using the right prompt asking it be more colorful could have...?). I guess what I'm trying to say is that there's something a bit misleading in this "clean" depiction which a human might present differently. BTW, is it me or in the "People Analytics and Talent Intelligence" comparison it's all a big mush? What happened there? And yes, I agree this is quite impressive and we should all be a bit scared :) Thanks for this very interesting experiment!