To UPC or not to UPC?

To UPC or not to UPC?

Unitary Patent – or Community Patent - has been subject to discussions for all my IP career, so for quite long. This summer it will finally become reality when the UPC finally enters into force. What is now needed from all EP patent holders and applicants, is to consider and decide whether they really want their IP assets to enter into this new era or not. There is now sunrise period ongoing, from 1st of March until 1st of June, to opt-out granted EP patents and published applications from the jurisdiction of UPC (Unitary Patent Court), if desired to be left out.

It is possible to opt-out your patents even after the sunrise period, during the transitional period of 6 years. However, if a third party has already brought an action before the UPC in respect of your patent, then it’s too late. So, in case your decision for some of your patents is definitely to opt out from the system, it is better to do opt-outs now, to guarantee that no one files proceedings against your patent via UPC once you’re opted-in.

Essentially, by entering into UPC your patent will be subject to potential centralized revocation by a third party. Unlike with EP patents, where each validated country has their own revocation proceedings, in UPC the process is centralized, and your patent could be invalidated in one proceeding. Vice versa, should you consider your patent be infringed by someone in Europe, you can yourself centralize the infringement proceeding via UPC.

I’ve attended few webinars related to this subject matter and read a bunch of newsletters from different patent agencies, and this is my summary of relevant aspects to be considered when making decisions.

Value of your patent

In case your patent is valuable for your own business, and it has been licensed in many UPC countries, you might want to consider twice to let the patent be subject to the centralized revocation proceedings by your competitors. Then again, if the value of the patent is more in third party use, you might want to get infringement proceeding and injunction for all UPC countries centrally handled by the Unitary Patent Court.

Scope of your patent

As a thumb rule, in case your claims are very wide, then your patent is more vulnerable to invalidation. In such a case, you might want to rather opt-out from UPC than opt-in. Vice versa, with very narrow claims your patent is probably less vulnerable to any annulment or invalidation proceedings, so safer to opt-in.

Validations of your patent

What is worth noting is that UPC does not cover all EU countries but only those 17 countries that have ratified the agreement. These are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Sweden. For all other countries, EPC convention remains to be applied. Should your patent be validated only in other EU countries than those belonging to UPC, then decision making is not relevant to you as UPC does not apply to them.

What changes in applying EP patents in the new system? You might be surprised to hear that the way patent applications are filed and prosecuted will not change in the new system. However, when your application reaches the grant phase, during the transitional period you can still decide whether you want the patent to be within the scope of EPC or UPC. What are the pros and cons for this decision making, in addition to aspects that were already explained in respect of centralized vs. national revocation process?

Costs

Unlike in EPC where the annual fees are paid to each and every validated country’s patent office, in unitary patent system only one annual fee is paid to EPO (so there is no separate Unitary Patent Office). In other words, only one payment, one currency and one regime, which makes the payment procedure simplified. The level of this single annual fee is the same as maintaining 3-4 national patents, so if you tend to validate your patents in more than 3 countries, it may be more cost-effective to opt the patent in as unitary patent.

Translations

For EP patents, you currently need to translate the claims to two official languages of the EPO, other than the language of the proceedings. In case you have filed your EP application in English, in grant phase you need to translate the claims to German and French. Also, you need to translate the claims to languages of your validated countries. However, in Unitary Patent system, during the transitional period, you have to also file one full translation of the patent specification into English, if the language of the proceedings was German and French, and in case the language of the proceedings was English, into any other official EU member state language. Interestingly, the latter requirement is not restricted to UPC countries. Now, depending on length of your specification (20 or 200 pages), this requirement may also increase costs.

What else? I cannot think of any other aspects now but in case you do, please share your thoughts - as applicant, patent owner, patent attorney, other...?

Very nice summary! Many thanks!

John H?rd

UPC Representative Europen Patent Attorney Swedish Patent Attorney

1 年

Hi Anne-Marie, there is one issue missing from your well-written discussion on the UPC, and that is infringement. Not only will validity be decided centrally, but also infringement. And, unlike validity, there is no caselaw to rely on for infringement issues. Assumingly, the UPC will fall back on EPC caselaw for validity issues, but this will not be possible for infringement issues or other procedural issues. Taking also into account that the UPC judges have very different backgrounds and experience, some never having been a judge before, it will also be almost impossible to estimate how an infringement litigation will go... Comparing to for example litigation in Germany, where the outcome is relatively easy to "guess" as Germany has a lot of caselaw and the German judges are very experienced, the uncertainty of UPC infringement litigation is certainly something to take into account when choosing to opt-in or opt-out.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Anne-Mari Lummevuo的更多文章

  • Rumour has it, lawyers have it

    Rumour has it, lawyers have it

    It’s not once or twice in my 25+ year career that I have been asked to adopt a role other than legal, because of my…

  • “Coding Enzymes & Digestive Algorithms”

    “Coding Enzymes & Digestive Algorithms”

    I recently wrote a comparison between codec and human digestive system, at very general level (https://www.linkedin.

  • If codecs were human

    If codecs were human

    I’m a patent and technology lawyer, and I always want to understand at least the basics of the technological solutions…

    2 条评论
  • Don’t keep your patents in the closet!

    Don’t keep your patents in the closet!

    I am enthusiastic recycler. It is important for me that different materials such as paper, plastic and metals are…

    6 条评论
  • Piece of Cake - or Data?

    Piece of Cake - or Data?

    Those that are familiar with my doctoral dissertation thesis, also know my adopted metaphor of “piece of cake”. In my…

  • Be careful what you wish for!

    Be careful what you wish for!

    Many things that you could only vision to happen in the old days is reality nowadays. I do not claim to have visioned…

    1 条评论
  • Security in Digital World

    Security in Digital World

    I’ve written earlier about world going digital from the point of view of our ordinary life (https://www.linkedin.

    1 条评论
  • New Era of Logos - is Less More?

    New Era of Logos - is Less More?

    I am by no means brand expert but lately, I have been wondering whether there is an ongoing trend for company logos…

    2 条评论
  • Cryptography for toddlers

    Cryptography for toddlers

    As a tech lawyer, you come across with variety of technological solutions that are designed to comply sometimes even…

    1 条评论
  • If patent families were real families

    If patent families were real families

    Back in my Nokia IPR years we used to sometimes have fun at work and play with terminologies with few colleagues*) of…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了