Untangling Entanglement.
Pic Credit : Vijay Ramachandran

Untangling Entanglement.

Pic credit: Vijay Ramachandran

Quantum Entanglement is weird, mind-boggling, and very real!

But what is Real? Really!

Do you know that there are no colours? Do you also know that there is no sound?

Colours are our brain's interpretation of a light wave. Objectively speaking, there are no colours but only light waves of different wavelengths.

Sound is our brain's interpretation of the vibration of air/water. Objectively speaking, there is no sound except a vibration propagating as an acoustic wave through a transmission medium.

Our brain has evolved to differentiate between objects through different colours and movements through sound. But this is just one way to perceive Reality.

It may have been equally possible that we could have evolved into?seeing sound?and?hearing light!

Quantum Physics is central to the question of what Reality is, and Entanglement is at the heart of Quantum physics.?

Entanglement works at the subatomic level. When entangled, particles like electrons and photons can remain connected even when separated by vast distances. Even if you send two entangled photons at the two edges of a galaxy, they will continue to show a correlation between their Quantum states. The separated photons behave essentially like one unit.

2022's Nobel Prize in Physics is awarded to John Clauser, Alain Aspect, and Anton Zeilinger for the pioneering development of quantum information systems, entangled photons, and the violation of Bell's inequalities.??

A flock of birds, A school of fish, or A herd of animals can behave like one unit. Each component of a compounded system can be independent, yet collectively, the group can have a life of its own.

Extrapolating this to the nth level, the objective Reality has a life of its own while giving individuality to all its components.

Questions that come to mind are:?

  1. What is the nature of Objective Reality?
  2. How flawed is our perceived Reality in comparison to Objective Reality?
  3. Will humans ever possess the tools to understand what Objective Reality is?

Another fascinating property of subatomic particles is their ability to stay in the state of SUPERPOSITION. This makes it very hard and restricts our ability to measure their quantum state. Measuring a quantum state affects the state itself; hence, two Quantum states can't be estimated perfectly. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle demonstrates this.?

A few things can be noted here :?

  1. We can't say precisely where an electron is in its orbit.?
  2. We can't make two entangled particles perfectly independent of each other.
  3. We can't know for sure how much or how far away we are from the objective Reality.

Then,

What can we really say with certainty?

Nothing!

From this point onwards, physics and philosophy start speaking the same language. Or maybe they are indeed the same. Who knows?

  • As we sharpen our intellect and gain knowledge, we can understand our circumstances better. As we improve our measurement tools, we become closer to objective Reality.
  • If we change the angle of measurement of an entanglement photon, our measure of the photon changes. If we change our perspective of things and situations, those situations change. Good-Bad, Right-Wrong, and Crest-Trough are just points of view; in other words, different angles of measurement of the same things.
  • A photon or electron remains in a superposition until you look at it. Meaning it could be at multiple places at the same time. The act of measurement fixes the photon to a particular state. Similarly, till we look at a situation and pass our biased judgment, things remain in a superposition state ( unbiased ); the moment we judge them, they become what we judge them to be!

Like subatomic particles, the objective Reality that includes everything is in a constant state of SUPERPOSITION.?

It has no colours, no sound, no features, and, most importantly, no attributes. Does it then sound like "Brahman" (?), the highest universal principle, the ultimate Reality in the universe??

It does; indeed, physics, philosophy, and spirituality are all entangled and inseparable, like entangled photons!

THE BLIND MEN AND THE ELEPHANT.

The poems of John Godfrey Saxe (1872)?

A?HINDOO ?FABLE.

I.

IT was six men of Indostan

To learning much inclined,

Who went to see the Elephant

(Though all of them were blind),

That each by observation

Might satisfy his mind.

II.

The?First?approached the Elephant,

And happening to fall

Against his broad and sturdy side,

At once began to bawl:

"God bless me!—but the Elephant

Is very like a wall!"

III.

The?Second, feeling of the tusk,

Cried: "Ho!—what have we here

So very round and smooth and sharp?

To me 't is mighty clear

This wonder of an Elephant

Is very like a spear!"

IV.

The?Third?approached the animal,

And happening to take

The squirming trunk within his hands,

Thus boldly up and spake:

"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant

Is very like a snake!"

V.

The?Fourth?reached out his eager hand,

And felt about the knee.

"What most this wondrous beast is like

Is mighty plain," quoth he;

"'T is clear enough the Elephant

Is very like a tree!"

VI.

The?Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,

Said: "E'en the blindest man

Can tell what this resembles most;

Deny the fact who can,

This marvel of an Elephant

Is very like a fan!"

VII.

The?Sixth?no sooner had begun

About the beast to grope,

Than, seizing on the swinging tail

That fell within his scope,

"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant

Is very like a rope!"

VIII.

And so these men of Indostan

Disputed loud and long,

Each in his own opinion

Exceeding stiff and strong,

Though each was partly in the right,

And all were in the wrong!

MORAL.

So, oft in theologic wars

The disputants, I ween,

Rail on in utter ignorance

Of what each other mean,

And prate about an Elephant

Not one of them has seen!

References:?

https://www.livescience.com/what-is-quantum-entanglement.html

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/press-release/

https://magazine.caltech.edu/post/untangling-entanglement

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Portal:Hinduism

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/quantum-entanglement-nobel-prize-physics/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

https://www.space.com/31933-quantum-entanglement-action-at-a-distance.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahman#:~:text=Brahman%20is%20a%20metaphysical%20concept,the%20goal%20of%20all%20existence .

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Vivek Sharan的更多文章

  • The impossible trinity of knowledge.

    The impossible trinity of knowledge.

    As I dig deeper into academic research, I can see the paradox more clearly that has silently shaped the course of our…

    10 条评论
  • Hardwired.

    Hardwired.

    The Creature speaks to Frankenstein: "You are my creator, but I am your master; obey!" PART I Mary Shelley was just 18…

  • Is Intelligence Artificial?

    Is Intelligence Artificial?

    "I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying." - Oscar Wilde.

    1 条评论
  • Perpetual Learners and Learning Machines!

    Perpetual Learners and Learning Machines!

    Occasionally you read or listen to something so meaningful that not sharing seems like a crime! Before that, three…

  • What would have Ludwig Wittgenstein said about Chat GPT-3?

    What would have Ludwig Wittgenstein said about Chat GPT-3?

    The real question is? "What would Chat GPT-3 say about what Ludwig Wittgenstein would have said about Chat GPT-3? Let's…

  • What can a Ship teach Individuals and Organizations?

    What can a Ship teach Individuals and Organizations?

    1. Ships don't navigate in a straight line like a bullet: To be fair even bullets don't follow a straight path.

    10 条评论
  • Holes in Hierarchy!

    Holes in Hierarchy!

    Everyone knows what Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Theory is. What people don't know is that there is a hamster wheel at…

    11 条评论
  • "Keyser S?ze" and the basis of "Bias"

    "Keyser S?ze" and the basis of "Bias"

    PART 1 Last Scene: "The Usual Suspects" "Moments later, Kujan realizes "Verbal" apparently fabricated his entire story…

  • The Parable Of The Ox (paraphrased)

    The Parable Of The Ox (paraphrased)

    PART 1 "In 1906, the great statistician Francis Galton observed a competition to guess the weight of an Ox at a country…

    8 条评论
  • If you are so intelligent, why are you not wealthy?

    If you are so intelligent, why are you not wealthy?

    PART 1 I managed to moderately offend one of my close friends by asking this offensive question. If you are so…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了