UNS at a glance

UNS at a glance

If you have wondered "What is a Unified Name Space?", refer to the two summary diagrams below showing Information Definition + Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Infrastructure:

Overview

Deployment scenarios


UNS Criteria:

  • Includes an Industrial Internet of Things Infrastructure to facilitate moving, shaping, and storing of data, allowing multiple information consumers to connect with multiple data producers.
  • Provides IIoT Portal(s) for an application or device to obtain and provide real-time information and events about the enterprise.
  • Integrates new information producers into an enterprise's Information Definition (semantic hierarchy) enabling interested consumers throughout the enterprise to automatically receive its data.

If you are now wondering "How to get a UNS?", welcome to the Fourth Industrial Revolution!

Jacobus A. du Preez

Lead Transition Architect @ Tronox | Enterprise Architecture Consultant

6 个月

The UNS construct unite two concepts, IIOT infrastructure protocols and an enterprise ontology describing the information definition. As an architect it is important to label the concepts correctly. The information definition is based on the ISA-95 Part 2 taxonomy, but is not a taxonomy itself, but rather an ontology which describes the semantic data. Semantic data also forms the basis for web3 as semantic Web. What is required is the definition of an Enterprise ontology to form the foundation of the UNS. The described UNS construct also addresses only two of the six interogative perspectives; IIOT infrastructure (WHERE) and information definition (WHAT). If the UNS as a construct is to exceed in the long-term, it would need to address all 6 interrogative perspectives, with the information definition described as an enterprise ontology using OWL as an ontology language.

回复

I believe there is a lot of work to be done. This solves one piece of a large MBE architecture. I worry that we’re becoming prescriptive before understanding the complete scope of the problem. I’m in favor of model-based standards that share common abstract semantics and can share behavioral components so they can be composed. Aside from that, true ontologies that are valid using a reasoner and have a full FOL definition are going to solve a lot of the terminology disfunction we have today. I get worried when we start talking protocol and representations too soon.

Rick Bullotta

Investor/Advisor/Mentor

11 个月

I still think we're asking the wrong questions - or as Steve Jobs famously said, "you're holding it wrong". A UNS by definition provides only the "current state", and therefore is only a part of the solution. A more comprehensive IIoT platform is needed to solve the macro problems and capture the macro opportunities. So we either need to evolve the definition of a UNS to be more all encompassing (historical data, services/actions, graph models) or we declare a UNS to be simply a subset of an IIoT platform's functionality.

Paul Brodbeck

Chief Technologist at Continua Process Systems

11 个月

Thanks for the great information - we still of a ways to go to discover the best digital transformation solution.

回复
Sakari Aulanko

Technology & Innovation Lead

12 个月

This is great summary, well done ?? Very common misconception of UNS is considering it as "one namespace that rules them all". In reality power comes by having capability to combine, reuse, create, coexist, maintain different namespaces in efficient manner, and providing easy (single pane of glass) access to curated data from edge to cloud. Data is a product/bi-product of manufacturing, and the consumer applications and services should not have responsibility of it. That does not foster overall efficiency or quality of digital services.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Matthew Parris的更多文章

  • UNS Further Explained

    UNS Further Explained

    This article includes (1) the definition of components comprising a Unified Namespace, (2) an overview diagram of a UNS…

    12 条评论
  • Rockwell versus Power Over Ethernet?

    Rockwell versus Power Over Ethernet?

    Clarification from the Author: The term Power Over Ethernet within this article refers to those designs specified by…

    25 条评论
  • The OPC UA brand has failed and cannot be salvaged

    The OPC UA brand has failed and cannot be salvaged

    Development of the OPC UA brand started over 20 years ago, in a time when the iPhone was still four years away from…

    92 条评论
  • How OPC UA and MQTT Prevent Interoperability

    How OPC UA and MQTT Prevent Interoperability

    Note from the Author: The content below was originally published in an article titled "How protocols fail at data…

    21 条评论
  • OPC UA is Vaporware

    OPC UA is Vaporware

    Within the past few years, those designing and sustaining manufacturing facilities have been exposed to many terms with…

    18 条评论
  • What technologies are ready for your IIoT Architecture?

    What technologies are ready for your IIoT Architecture?

    The burgeoning Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) sector has become an incubator of manufacturing technologies. The…

    4 条评论
  • Open Letter to OPC Foundation from a Manufacturing End User

    Open Letter to OPC Foundation from a Manufacturing End User

    Many cloud companies are excited, and rightly so, about the standardization of transport protocol and data modeling for…

    15 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了