Unmasking the Pitfalls of AI in the Courtroom: A New York Lawyer's Wake-Up Call.

In a surprising turn of events, a New York attorney finds himself in hot water after using ChatGPT, an AI language model, for legal research in a lawsuit against Avianca Airlines.

The case took an unexpected twist when inconsistencies and factual errors were brought to the judge's attention, leading to a revelation that the attorney had relied on ChatGPT's questionable content. ????? ♂?

Steven Schwartz, a lawyer from the renowned law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, was representing Robert Mata, who claimed to have suffered an injury from a serving cart during a flight with Avianca Airlines in 2019. However, the judge noticed discrepancies in the case documentation, prompting Schwartz to admit his use of ChatGPT in a sworn affidavit. ???

In his affidavit, Schwartz confessed that he had naively trusted the AI language model and was unaware of the possibility of false information.

He expressed regret for not conducting his own due diligence and acknowledged the repercussions of his ill-fated experiment. ??

The judge, in an April 5 court filing, raised serious concerns about the submitted cases, calling them "bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations." The revelation also exposed instances where nonexistent cases were referenced, and even a mix-up of docket numbers occurred. ????

This unfortunate incident serves as a cautionary tale about the limitations of relying solely on AI technology for critical legal research.

While AI can be a valuable tool, it should never replace the expertise and discernment of human legal professionals. ????

Schwartz's misstep highlights the need for lawyers to conduct thorough independent research and exercise their own judgment when building their cases.

As the legal profession embraces technology, it must do so with careful consideration, and understanding the potential pitfalls that may arise. ????

In the end, the consequences of Schwartz's reliance on ChatGPT may prove costly for his client and his professional reputation. This incident reminds us that the practice of law requires a human touch, a keen eye for detail, and a dash of skepticism, even in the age of advanced AI.

Let this be a lesson to all legal professionals: Embrace technology, but never forget the importance of human intellect and critical thinking. ??????

Follow for more crypto content. Source of artcie: cointelegraph