Unlocking the Potential of Rooftop Solar in India: Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Resco Model

Unlocking the Potential of Rooftop Solar in India: Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Resco Model

Rooftop solar energy holds immense promise for India's renewable energy landscape, offering a decentralized solution to power generation. As the country witnesses a surge in solar adoption, particularly in the rooftop segment, the Resco (Renewable Energy Service Company) model emerges as a compelling option for consumers looking to embrace sustainability while minimizing upfront investment and operational hassles.

In the realm of rooftop solar, the Resco model presents a viable alternative to traditional capital expenditure (Capex) approaches. Under this model, developers invest in rooftop solar installations and enter into power purchase agreements (PPAs) with off-takers for predetermined terms, typically spanning 8 to 25 years. This arrangement not only alleviates the financial burden on off-takers but also absolves them from the complexities of system maintenance, making rooftop solar accessible to a broader spectrum of consumers.

The appeal of the Resco model lies in its ability to leverage the cost differential between conventional utility tariffs and the landed cost of solar energy. By outsourcing the ownership and management of solar systems to developers, off-takers can realize immediate savings on energy bills without the need for substantial upfront capital. This financial engineering aspect makes rooftop solar an attractive proposition for businesses, industries, and residential complexes alike.

However, it's essential to scrutinize the efficacy of the Resco model, particularly in the context of rooftop solar projects. While it offers undeniable advantages in terms of cost savings and maintenance convenience, there are inherent limitations that must be acknowledged.

One such limitation stems from the developer's incentive structure. The tariff offered by developers under the Resco model is often influenced by the upfront cost of solar installations and the projected savings in utility expenses for the off-taker. Consequently, developers may prioritize lower-cost solutions, compromising on the quality of components and technologies deployed. This trade-off between cost and performance could potentially impact the long-term efficiency and reliability of rooftop solar systems. This is important if the off-taker has a plan to buy back the system which most of the time is a standard.

Moreover, rooftop solar projects executed under the Resco model may lack the customization and optimization opportunities afforded by direct investment through Capex approaches. Offtakers who opt for the Resco model may find themselves with standardized solutions that do not fully align with their specific energy requirements or operational preferences. This lack of flexibility could limit the overall effectiveness and adaptability of rooftop solar installations over time.

In contrast, solar projects executed under the Capex model, particularly by reputable turnkey EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) companies, have the potential to deliver superior performance. By investing directly in the project, the off-taker can select the best combination of products and technologies, maximizing energy generation over the project's lifetime.

Moreover, concerns regarding plant maintenance can be addressed through proper management and specialized asset maintenance companies. Competent EPC players can not only ensure the seamless installation of the plant but also offer maintenance guarantees, ensuring optimal performance.

In conclusion, while the Resco model offers attractive benefits such as cost savings and simplified maintenance, it may not yield the highest-performing solar plants compared to those developed under the Capex model. Offtakers should prioritize the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and long-term generation potential when evaluating solar project options. By investing in quality EPC players and focusing on lifetime project performance, off-takers can ensure sustainable and efficient energy generation for years to come.

Dipankar Pal

MD and Co Founder at Roofsol Energy Private Limited

10 个月

I was a bit disappointed to find that last year there was a fall in the RESCO capacities in Rooftop Solar space. Whereas the falling module prices should have stimulated the offtakers and the investors alike towards higher growth. We need more investors and manufacturers to open up their minds! With land acquisition becoming more and more difficult, MNRE should also open up the warehouse roofs as open access opportunities!

Jayesh Gawade

Co-Founder at Vjay Engineers (Infra development) & Founder at Jija Agro Industries (Food & beverages)

10 个月

Insigntful

Anand Limaye

Director - Service Centre | EC Member | IC Member | ESG beginner

10 个月

A nice write-up Rajesh. It’s similar to managing money by ourselves or having money manager (at cost) - in case of investment banking / MF, fund manager. For short term / growing business of course opex model suits the best; however in that case it becomes extremely important / visionary for the companies to shift to Capex model while developing skills to manage the systems via own staff for obtaining best efficiency from the system.

Amit Suman Thussu - Solar Sales and Marketing

CMO @Feston SEV| Helping solar installers in India run a successful and Profitable business|17+ Years Experience, Solar Sales & Marketing | +919971157755

10 个月

Great analysis Rajesh Kulkarni! Resco offers a fantastic entry point for many, but Capex allows for superior customization and long-term efficiency. Key for businesses to weigh cost vs performance goals.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Rajesh Kulkarni的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了