Unlocking 90s GE Secrets: Proven Business Lessons For Contemporary Success
Christian Stadler
Professor of Strategic Management at Warwick Business School
In the 90s GE reported nine straight years of double-digit profit growth. The stock market responded in kind, and the share price rose almost 10-fold.
The world is different today but two similarities caught my eyes. First, like today the decade started with periods of uncertainty and recession. Second, advance in technology - AI today, the internet back then - can kick-start an era of growth.
With this in mind, why not search for lessons from GE, the most admired company of the 90s?
Lesson #1: efficiency is king
At the core of GE’s success was a relentless drive towards efficiency. In a large conglomerate, lots of discipline is needed to reduce bureaucracy and consistently drive down costs. GE did so in two different ways: First, Jack Welch, the CEO since 1981, worked hard to overcome the company's old hierarchical approach, with its 29 layers of management. By the 1990s, a new culture of informality allowed people to communicate across layers and get things done quickly.?Secondly, GE transformed Six Sigma from a tool that ensured manufacturing quality to one that reduced mistakes and cut out slack in all service-related activities. Incentives and promotions were closely tied to the ability to master Six Sigma. After its introduction, operating profit margins increased from 14.4% in 1995 to 17.3% in 1999.
My own research on companies succeeding for more than 100 years tells the same story: efficiency is as important as innovation.
Lesson #2: if you are not No. 1 or 2 in an industry, leave
Performance and efficiency also guided GE’s portfolio decisions. A rule since adopted by many companies was that each business had to be No. 1 or 2 in its industry – otherwise it was sold or shut down. But the spread of GE's activities was wider than what most analysts recommend today. Medical technology, appliances, turbines, light bulbs, and plastics all found a home in the conglomerate. Economic theory suggests that companies can move outside their core activities, as long as marginal benefits outpace marginal costs. Looking forward, this means that some companies might define their core business too narrowly today. Particularly in emerging economies, a trusted brand or good relationships with suppliers and governments can be leveraged across a wide range of activities.
领英推荐
Lesson #3: expand into markets neglected by others
While GE focused on efficiency, it also expanded into new markets, more than doubling its revenues. A big driver behind this growth was the acquisitions it made both in the U.S. and abroad.
Internationally, GE showed a strong preference for bargain hunting. The company often made big acquisitions when a country had fallen out of favor. For example, when Mexico devalued the Peso, and the economy was in turmoil, GE made?10 acquisitions and invested more than $1 billion in new and existing operations there. In Europe, it picked up a number of financial service providers, such as SOVAC SA and Credit de l'Est in France, during the sluggish mid-1990s. This counter-cyclical international growth makes sense as it is cheaper and companies that are not for sale during the good years are available.
In 2024 there are plenty of struggling countries to choose from. Firms might want take a look at bargains in Germany, Nigeria, or possibly South Korea. It is important to note, though, that GE was an experienced global player. Tarun Khanna from Harvard points out that industries are very different in different countries. So even if you are a strong player at home, you should not take the challenges abroad lightly.
Lesson #4: Don’t be seduced by hype
Finally, it is also important to mention what GE did not do. It did not buy into the hype and try to turn itself into a dotcom company. Sure, GE used the internet to reduce paperwork and become more efficient, but management was focused primarily on production and much less on e-commerce. In 2024, this is important to remember. If you are not a tech company, don’t try to transform yourself into one. That does not mean that you ignore the opportunities of AI. What you need to figure out is how to use AI to support what you are great in already. And never forget, that this will require adjustments of established structures and processes.
To be ready for 2025, don’t look to Google and OpenAI – unless, of course, you're a tech company. GE’s story from the 1990s is probably more relevant. It highlights the importance of efficiency, informality and focus.
An earlier version of this article was published in Forbes.
Founder | Elevate Access Ltd
5 天前Thanks, Christian - great article and a timely reminder that while tools and contexts evolve, fundamentals like efficiency, focus, and disciplined growth remain essential. GE’s 1990s success shows how embracing change and harnessing innovation can help us navigate uncertainties and seize the opportunities ahead - especially as we enter a new cycle of AI and tech-driven transformation.
Let's Imagine What's Possible
1 个月Thank you Christian, great article. Good lessons here. I'm curious if #1 will stand in a future in which we increasingly look to outcome metrics of things like wellbeing and human agency. I think the idea you cite of a new culture of informality and people communicating still stands as an aspiration in that case. But will we continue to value efficiency as much in a world aimed at human flourishing as an end in and of itself and as an aspiration for us all? I wonder if our corporations of the future will change to embrace new, more human-oriented ways of operating, perhaps less-efficient in some ways, by today's standards, even, but that might be more generative and life-affirming overall?
Deloitte Global Strategy & Innovation and Oxford Strategy assessor previously / Chief Strategy Officer / Head of Business Strategy / Head of Corporate Strategy / Strategy Director / Strategy Lead / Go-to-Market
2 个月Nice one Christian Stadler - timeless lessons, and very well articulated re AI.
Full Professor bei Technische Universit?t Wien: Leading.Strategic Change
2 个月Thank you, Christian, for this excellent post! Especially in times like these, a look back at past success strategies is refreshing. Not every hype needs to be followed—efficiency and a well-suited organizational structure matter more than trendy models where no one is accountable anymore. I would also like to add that GE, under Noel Tichy in Crotonville, invested heavily in leadership development! Exactly that would be more important than ever in times of crisis.
Yes, thanks Christian. The piece did not explain why GE then broke all these rules after 2000, especially about reducing efficiency, expanding only into neglected markets, and resisting the hype (for digitalization and 3D printing). Why didn't GE learn its own lessons?