United Nations Day: Celebrating the World's Best Paperweight?
Every year on October 24th, we gather to commemorate United Nations Day, a time to reflect on an institution initially designed to maintain peace and security in a post-World War II world. Yet, as we mark this occasion, one can’t help but ask: has the UN truly met its mission, or has it devolved into the world’s most expensive paperweight, moved only by the breeze of powerful nations?
Take the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, for instance. Two years in, and while NATO countries stand united with Ukraine, the UN remains largely silent, creating the illusion of action with little to show for it. Where is the UN’s clarity amid the chaos? Just more noise without real solutions.
Consider the Middle East, where the perpetual strife between Israel and Palestine rages on, with many innocent lives caught in the crossfire. The plight of the Palestinian people—facing persecution and the heartbreaking threat of genocide since 1947—draws attention. What has been the UN’s response? A cacophony of statements with no transformative action. While they preach about human rights, the innocent suffer—their voices drowned by the deafening silence of inaction.
Then, look across the African continent, where conflicts have sent ripples of destruction. Women and children are particularly vulnerable, with economic instability and food shortages threatening entire regions. And yet again, the UN’s voice resembles a faint whisper against the backdrop of devastation. One begins to wonder: is this the best the UN can do?
Let’s tackle the powerful players in this flawed game—the UN Security Council. This exclusive club, dominated by five permanent members—the US, Russia, the UK, France, and China—has the primo power of veto. Their interests take precedence over global needs, leaving many nations to wonder: why should these five dictate the fate of all member states? Where’s the representation for the myriad voices clamouring for change?
And while we’re questioning motives, let’s talk about NATO. Established in 1949 to counter the Soviet Union, why wasn’t it disbanded after the Cold War ended? Instead, we see its expansion from 12 to 32 members. Far removed from the UN’s mission of fostering peace, NATO appears to thrive on conflict and tension, while the UN flounders to assert its relevance.
Let’s also revisit the catastrophic consequences of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Initially justified by the disarmament of purported weapons of mass destruction, the reality revealed no such weapons existed. The invasion spiralled into nearly a decade of civil war, resulting in the loss of over 4,400 American troops and an estimated 300,000 Iraqi lives, leaving the nation in turmoil and instability.
领英推荐
The UN played a critical role before the invasion, with the Security Council passing Resolution 1441 demanding Iraqi compliance regarding weapons inspections. However, the invasion proceeded without a second resolution explicitly authorizing military action, igniting fierce debates about its legality and the UN's inaction at this crucial moment. The aftermath saw millions of Iraqis displaced, while the chaos paved the way for extremist groups like ISIS to gain a foothold, creating a ripple effect of instability in the region.
If the UN wishes to shed its image as the world’s puppet, it must take significant, decisive actions:
The question remains: can the UN expect to rise above being a mere spectator to power plays and truly fulfil its mission of global peace and security? The people of the world are watching, and they require more than just platitudes and press releases.
On this United Nations Day, let’s contemplate whether the institution can regain its credibility as a champion for the oppressed or will it continue to fade into irrelevance. Only time will reveal the answer.
#UnitedNationsDay #GlobalPeace #UNReform #Accountability #HumanRights #NATO #RussiaUkraineConflict #IraqInvasion
Amlan Dash, uN needs to act, not just talk.