A Unified Economic Strategy: Strengthening Canada’s Future

Canada’s economic reality is shaped by geography, trade dependencies, and provincial fragmentation in policy-making. While our vast natural resources and proximity to the United States offer advantages, they also expose us to vulnerabilities—most notably, over-reliance on a single trading partner. As the current U.S. administration signals a renewed wave of protectionist tariffs in 2025 (1), Canada must take a hard look at its economic resilience. The patriotic response from Canadians during previous trade disputes demonstrated national unity, but emotional and reactionary approaches are insufficient. What is needed is a federal-driven, strategic transformation of Canada’s economy to ensure long-term stability and competitiveness.

The Need for Centralized Economic Oversight

Canada’s decentralized economic policies and provincial control over key industries hinder our ability to respond effectively to global economic shifts. Federal oversight in matters of national economic interest is essential to ensuring Canada remains competitive and adaptable in an increasingly unstable global trade environment. The current system, where provinces exert control over critical infrastructure, resource development, and interprovincial trade, results in inefficiencies and lost opportunities. According to the Canadian Senate, internal trade barriers cost the country between $130 billion and $150 billion annually in lost GDP (2). This fragmentation weakens our ability to act decisively in response to economic threats.

Reducing Vulnerability to U.S. Trade Policies

Canada’s economy is deeply intertwined with the U.S., with over 75% of exports flowing south of the border (3). While geographic proximity and historical ties make this natural, it also means that American policy decisions—such as tariffs on aluminum, steel, and softwood lumber (4)—can destabilize entire sectors overnight. With the U.S. increasingly prioritizing domestic manufacturing under policies like "America First," Canada cannot afford to be reactive. Instead, a federal-led strategy should focus on diversifying trade partnerships and reducing dependency on raw material exports.

Building a Value-Added Economy

For too long, Canada has relied on exporting unprocessed natural resources, leaving us dependent on industrial nations—chiefly the U.S.—to purchase them. This limits our economic leverage and subjects us to price fluctuations in global commodity markets. A shift towards value-added industries is imperative. By leveraging our energy resources, human capital, and technological capabilities, Canada can produce finished goods that are competitive in global markets.

Key industries that should be prioritized for value-added production include:

• Battery and electric vehicle manufacturing: Utilizing Canada’s lithium, nickel, and cobalt reserves (ranked among the world’s top 10 (5)) for domestic EV battery production.
• Advanced forestry products: Canada exports $20 billion annually in raw logs and pulp (6), but value-added wood products could capture higher margins.
• Clean energy technology: Canada’s renewable energy sector could grow to $100 billion in annual revenue by 2050 with targeted investment (7).
• Agrifood processing: Only 12% of Canada’s agri-food exports are processed goods (8), compared to 40% in the Netherlands.

Overcoming Infrastructure and Trade Barriers

A robust national economy requires seamless internal connectivity. Canada’s power grid, railways, and transportation corridors should be governed under a unified infrastructure strategy. The lack of a coordinated national energy policy has led to inefficiencies, such as the inability to build an east-west pipeline, forcing provinces like New Brunswick to import 90,000 barrels of foreign oil daily despite Canada’s status as the 4th-largest oil producer (9). Similarly, rail bottlenecks cost the economy $250 million annually in delays (10).

A Roadmap for Federal Leadership

To drive this transformation, the federal government must:

1. Expand trade diversification efforts: Accelerate ratification of the Indo-Pacific Trade Agreement, projected to boost exports by $15 billion by 2030 (11).
2. Create national incentives for value-added industries: Mirror Quebec’s 30% tax credit for EV battery plants (12) at the federal level.
3. Establish a national energy strategy: Align with the Canada Infrastructure Bank’s $10 billion commitment to clean energy projects (13).
4. Reduce interprovincial trade barriers: Fully implement the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, which has eliminated only 15% of barriers since 2017 (14).
5. Implement industrial policy reforms: Increase R&D spending from 1.6% to 3% of GDP to match South Korea’s innovation-driven growth (15).

trade partner. By embracing a federal-driven, unified strategy that prioritizes diversification, value-added production, and national infrastructure development, we can build an economy that is resilient, globally competitive, and positioned for long-term prosperity.

References

1. White House (2023). 2023 Trade Policy Agenda and 2022 Annual Report.
2. Canadian Senate (2022). Tearing Down Walls: Modernizing Internal Trade.
3. Statistics Canada (2023). International Merchandise Trade Annual Review.
4. U.S. Trade Representative (2020). Section 232 Tariffs on Aluminum and Steel.
5. Natural Resources Canada (2023). Critical Minerals Strategy.
6. Forest Products Association of Canada (2022). State of the Industry Report.
7. Clean Energy Canada (2023). The New Reality.
8. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2021). Agri-Food Trade Annual Report.
9. Canada Energy Regulator (2023). Crude Oil Import/Export Statistics.
10. Canadian Transportation Agency (2022). Freight Rail Performance Review.
11. Global Affairs Canada (2023). Indo-Pacific Strategy Economic Impact Assessment.
12. Investissement Québec (2023). EV Supply Chain Incentive Program.
13. Canada Infrastructure Bank (2023). Annual Report.
14. Canadian Free Trade Agreement Secretariat (2022). Implementation Progress Report.
15. OECD (2023). Main Science and Technology Indicators.

?