Unforced error

Unforced error

In case anyone was in any doubt, Country Garden Holdings’ failed attempt to launch a convertible bond last week showed that Chinese property companies shouldn’t haggle too hard on pricing right now.

Country Garden is one of the strongest private sector credits in China’s property sector, with crossover ratings. In years gone by, it was known to pull bond deals over a matter of 10 or 20 basis points, which was standard practice at the time.

By insisting on a yield of 4.75% over the 5%–6% market sources reckoned was needed to clear the deal, the company stood to save up to US$4m in interest per year. It might have made sense to drive a hard bargain in a bull market, but US$4m is a drop in the ocean for a company that paid US$1.5bn in interest expenses for the first six months of last year.

In a market where investors are looking for signs of weakness, allowing a potential fundraising to fall through looks distinctly ill-advised. Country Garden’s shares fell 7.8% and its bond yield widened 200bp as investors learned that the deal had failed to gain enough traction to launch.

Fundraising is a treacherous task for Chinese developers these days, even when they get it right.

Sunac China Holdings saw its shares plunge 22.6% – not because it failed to agree on a fundraising, but because it came back to the equity market just two months after its last placement.

Traders ignored the strong response to the deal and wondered if selling shares at a double-digit discount was a sign of desperation, rather than simply the clearing price in a fragile market.

Since Shimao Group Holdings found itself in the headlines this month, it feels like any name in China’s property sector could be under stress.

The developer, which was rated investment grade as recently as November, has managed to shoot down some of the claims against it and bought itself breathing room by negotiating a loan extension. Twitchy traders seem to have moved onto the next target.

There will be plenty of negative headlines to come from the Chinese property sector. There’s no need for developers to create new ones by trying to execute deals at pricing that doesn’t match market realities.

They should establish their access to funding, then worry about improving the pricing terms when the crisis has passed.

Alexis Adamczyk

Pan Asia Head of Equity Capital Markets and Corporate Finance

3 年

Ouch!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Daniel Stanton的更多文章

  • Too much information

    Too much information

    For its latest issue, Indian conglomerate Shapoorji Pallonji Group appears to have learned its lesson from the private…

  • Waiting for windows

    Waiting for windows

    The only certainties in life these days are death, taxes, and market-moving posts on Truth Social. One of the…

  • Flotation aid

    Flotation aid

    The Philippines has become the latest jurisdiction to consider relaxing its free-float rules. In doing so, it is…

  • Jakarta jitters

    Jakarta jitters

    Fears of a swelling budget deficit, despite attempts to improve efficiency through spending cuts, rattled investors…

  • New branch

    New branch

    Asian corporates have a new ESG financing tool to mull over, with the introduction of nature-positive finance in Japan.…

  • Deep value

    Deep value

    Sceptics who wonder whether artificial intelligence technology actually does anything useful now have an answer: it can…

  • Made in China

    Made in China

    In a week dominated by US President Donald Trump’s will-he won’t-he trade tariffs, one of the biggest capital market…

  • Under wraps

    Under wraps

    There’s something contradictory about trying to keep the details of an initial public offering private for as long as…

  • SOE simple

    SOE simple

    Reforms to Indonesia’s state-owned enterprise law will simplify debt restructurings, but that doesn’t mean foreign…

  • Tea bubble

    Tea bubble

    If you want to forecast the outlook for Hong Kong’s equity capital market this year, don’t read the tea leaves, just…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了