Unf*cking Your CX #39: Stop Faking It—CLV Is the Only North Star That Matters
Zack Hamilton
LinkedIn Top CX Voice | Author, Unf*cking Your CX | SaaS Executive, Practicioner, Enabler | Sales Velocity Multiplier
Let’s face it—most brands are faking it when it comes to Customer Lifetime Value (CLV). They talk about loyalty and relationships, but what they really focus on are flashy metrics that make quarterly earnings look good.
Here’s the truth: If you’re still treating CLV as an afterthought—or worse, ignoring it entirely—you’re already falling behind.
CLV isn’t just a number. It’s the ultimate measure of how well you’re meeting customer expectations, delivering value, and creating experiences that make them want to stick around.
What Is CLV—and Why Does It Matter?
At its core, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) is the total value a customer brings to your business over their relationship with you. It’s not just about dollars spent; it’s about loyalty, advocacy, and the trust you build along the way.
Here’s the classic formula for calculating CLV:
CLV = (Average Purchase Value × Purchase Frequency × Customer Lifespan)
But let’s take it a step further. CLV is also “the sum of your customer’s loyalty through met expectations, great experiences, and genuine appreciation for who they are.”
How to Measure CLV
While the formula seems simple, measuring CLV isn’t. Most brands mess this up for two reasons:
To measure CLV effectively:
Lead Measures That Build CLV
Too many brands focus only on lag measures like total revenue or churn rates. Here are the lead measures that actually drive CLV:
Why Brands Struggle with CLV
Here’s the ugly truth: most brands don’t like their CLV numbers, so they avoid them.
Instead, they focus on short-term wins like acquisition campaigns or inflated NPS scores. Here’s why this mindset is a disaster:
Alternate Definitions
领英推荐
How Brands Are F*cking Up CLV
If you’re making any of these mistakes, you’re sabotaging your CLV:
Connecting CX and CLV: A Step-by-Step Guide
3 Player Tips for Elevating CLV
2. Champion the PPX
3. Quantify Cost of Inaction
2 Frameworks for Driving CLV
Framework #1: The CLV Growth Loop
Framework #2: The Advocacy Flywheel
Thought-Provoking Question: Is your CX strategy focused on keeping customers happy for the next purchase—or for the next decade?
Conclusion: CLV Isn’t the Future—It’s the F*cking Present
Let’s cut the fluff: CLV isn’t some “future-proofing” strategy—it’s the here and now. If you’re still clinging to vanity metrics like NPS or obsessing over short-term wins, you’ve already lost.
The brands that will dominate aren’t the ones playing it safe—they’re the ones doubling down on what matters. CLV isn’t a nice-to-have—it’s your North Star. It’s the difference between a brand that survives the next quarter and one that thrives for decades.
Here’s the bottom line: every decision you make should scream CLV. Anything less? You’re selling out your customers, your credibility, and your future.
Head of Customer Success | Data-driven Revenue Growth, Customer Retention & Operational Leadership | B2B SaaS | Submariner
4 周CLV and Customer Effort (how easy it is for customers to work with you and to get done what they need with your product/service) are really all you need.
Customer-Driven Servant Leader Obsessed with Customer Experience, Service, Relationships, Outcomes & Retention | Experience in Operations, Strategy, Process Optimization, Driving Transformational Change, Revenue & Growth
1 个月Another great article Zack Hamilton. Thank you for reminding us about the multi-layered impact that these metrics can have and the myriad of opportunities the data gives us to improve in so many ways.
Buyers talk ?? → You join ??? → Sales grow ? Founder at Extrovert: track your customers' social activity, spot relevant topics, and help your sales team comment genuinely, building trust at scale in minutes a day
1 个月Totally with you on CLV importance! Though I think having multiple metrics helps see the full picture. NPS can signal issues early, before they hit CLV. It's like having both long and short-term vital signs :D
SaaS Operations Strategist | Former COO | CX & Digital Transformation Expert | Driving Efficiency & Growth in Tech | U.S. Army Veteran & Veteran Advocate
1 个月In SaaS we always look at CLV (or LTV) in relation to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) or the "LTV/CAC Ratio" - and absolutely is a key metric discussed by boards and investors. Now - if you can illustrate how NPS impacts these metrics you're on to something! https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/valuation/cac-ltv-ratio/
Customer Experience Leadership | Revenue Operations | Biblio-maniac and Power Learner | Healthcare and Medical Devices
1 个月Super strong insight, Zach. It’s no secret that for years I’ve grown increasingly disenchanted with NPS, having learned its limitations first-hand. Some time ago, I shifted to a CLV mindset, adopting it as a more desirable beacon metric. But In discussions around this, I’ve run into counter opinions because CLV can be very difficult to calculate (even using a CLV calculator) and because it may be too blunt in instances when the consumption lifespan is extremely long. There are lots of cases where CLV is excellent, far superior to NPS for all the reasons you state (easy examples—subscription-based businesses, professional services), but I see why it may not always be the best choice. I was once told by an executive I respect that “CLV isn’t on anybody’s financial statement. Don’t fight the tide—focus on something we already care about.” It got me thinking that a company’s CX north star metric, if they choose one, might best be individualized based on the financials, business context, brand promises, and north star experience the company wants to deliver. CLV is very valuable, but I’m also curious about north star metric alternatives or other approaches CX leaders have used successfully.