Understanding Void Contracts and Voidable Contracts.

Contracts serve as the backbone of business and legal transactions, providing a framework for parties to define their rights and obligations. However, not all contracts are created equal, and understanding the nuances between void contracts and voidable contracts is essential in the world of law and commerce. In this article, we will delve into the distinctions between void and voidable contracts, emphasizing the significance of genuine consent and lawful objectives in the formation of enforceable agreements.

Void Contracts

A void contract is one that is inherently unenforceable from the beginning due to its nature or content. Such contracts lack legal validity and are considered void ab initio, meaning they are void from the start.

Reasons for Voidness

1. Illegality: Contracts that involve illegal activities or are against public policy are deemed void. For instance, agreements to commit a crime or contracts that promote fraudulent activities fall into this category.
2. Mistake: Contracts entered into based on a fundamental mistake by one or both parties can be declared void. This could include mistakes about the subject matter, identity of the parties, or the terms of the contract.
3. Uncertainty: If the terms of a contract are vague or uncertain to the extent that the court cannot determine the parties' obligations, the contract may be considered void.
4. Impossibility: Contracts that are impossible to perform due to unforeseen circumstances or events beyond the control of the parties may be deemed void.

Voidable Contracts

A voidable contract, on the other hand, is initially valid and enforceable, but it possesses a flaw that allows one of the parties to void the contract under certain conditions. These contracts remain in effect until the aggrieved party chooses to void them.

Reasons for Voidability

1. Lack of Capacity: If one of the parties lacks the legal capacity to enter into a contract, such as minors or individuals deemed mentally incompetent, the contract may be voidable.
2. Misrepresentation: Contracts entered into based on false statements or misrepresentations by one of the parties may be voidable by the party who relied on the misrepresented information.
3. Duress: Contracts obtained through coercion, threats, or force can be voidable. If one party is compelled to enter into the contract against their will, they have the option to void it.
4. Undue Influence: If one party exercises undue influence over the other, exploiting a position of trust and confidence, the affected party may have the right to void the contract.

Importance of Genuine Consent and Lawful Objectives

Genuine Consent

1. Mutual Assent: For a contract to be valid, there must be mutual assent or a meeting of the minds between the parties. Genuine consent ensures that both parties fully understand and agree to the terms of the contract.
2. Freedom from Coercion: [the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats] True consent requires freedom from coercion, duress, or undue influence. Contracts tainted by such factors may be voidable.

Lawful Objectives

1. Public Policy: Contracts must not violate public policy or engage in activities that are illegal or against societal norms. Contracts that do so are void as a matter of public interest.
2. Certainty and Possibility of Performance: Contracts must have clear and definite terms, and their performance must be possible. Uncertain or impossible contracts are vulnerable to being deemed void.

In the complex landscape of legal and business transactions, understanding the distinctions between void contracts and voidable contracts is paramount. Void contracts are inherently unenforceable due to illegality, mistake, uncertainty, or impossibility, while voidable contracts are initially valid but can be voided due to factors such as lack of capacity, misrepresentation, duress, or undue influence. Both concepts underscore the importance of genuine consent and lawful objectives in the formation of contracts, promoting fairness and justice in contractual relationships. As individuals engage in contractual agreements, a clear understanding of these concepts will empower them to navigate the legal landscape with confidence and integrity.

The Writer: Chathurka VINDANA, the founder of MrQS; the newsletter for sharing the QS and Contracts Management wisdom around the Globe for FREE!

MORE READS ON CLAIMS

1. What is a Global Claim: Click here
2. Construction Claims: Click here
3. Acceleration Claims: Click here
4. Delays and Disruptions in Construction: Click here
5. Extension of Time and Prolongation Costs: Click here
6. A Guide to Claims Procedures in FIDIC 1999: Click here
7. Dive into the Nuances of Delay and Disruption in Project Management: Click here