Understanding the Times by Removing the Noise

Understanding the Times by Removing the Noise

There is an old Chinese proverb that states “May you be cursed to live in interesting times.” Well to say we live in interesting times would be an understatement. Whether it be COVID, the growing divide in society - literally everywhere, the breakdown of trust in our governments, in our media, the failing economy, climate concerns, and growing “tribalism” around any number of issues, I think it would be fair to say we are faced today with a myriad of problems that no other generation has encountered.

Most of us used to simply shrug our shoulders, put our heads down and keep moving forward. After all, if things didn’t really impact us, didn’t touch us why worry? Not so anymore. And to educate ourselves, to stay informed, to find the information to stay anchored in these uncertain times we have found too that reliable information is harder to find, and harder to verify. Certainly, in Canada and much of the Western World trust in the mainstream media is at an all-time low as all pretense of objectivity has been tossed out the window and trying to find the “truth” in all the noise is getting harder to do. (Not to mention the Orwellian tendencies currently of “redefining” terms and phrases that once had a common understanding into something that has become foreign and double-speak to most.)

So let’s see if we can create filters that help us make things much simpler to understand. First, society can be divided into two groups – those who build and those who tear down. The first is really hard to do and the other we do all the time with ease. (You don't have to learn to tear something down.) No one ever says they are for destruction (except for Marxists and anarchists – but that is for another time) and everyone likes to say they are for progress and growth. The words are said, but do the actions align with them? My advice then is when examining the validity of a report or idea look at the actions that go with that group, are they building or are they tearing down?

Second, let’s examine a second filter, truth-telling. This on the face of it may seem a difficult if not impossible task but with some careful examination is actually pretty easy to do. Truth-telling is revealed in what I call the internal consistency of one's actions. Like building or tearing down, actions often reveal the true nature of an individual or movement. For example, if someone says they are for women’s rights but have actions that betray that statement such as a history of treating women poorly, then they are a liar and not a truth-teller. If you have a group that claims they are for tolerance and understanding but have actions that demonstrate intolerance even toward one group, then they fall into the “non-truth telling” category and their words should be viewed with skepticism.

We all have an internal consistency where our actions will inevitably reveal our true attitude and perspective. This is not a new concept. For example, generations of people were encouraged to have long engagements so that those contemplating a life together could ascertain through their partner's actions whether their “talk and walk” lined up. It's easy to pull the wool over someones eyes for a short while but the deception is ultimately revealed over time.

These are just two simple ways to remove some of the noise that can get in the way of figuring things out. Of understanding what is happening in the world around us. And, who or what group is actually building and truth-telling? You may not like what you learn but at least you will know you are getting a clearer picture, and that's a start.

Michelle Louw

Creative Strategist | Coach

3 年

James, thanks for sharing!

回复
ROBERT MILLS

Journeyman Instrument Technician Red Seal

4 年

The problem is there's way to much noise hard to ignore.

回复
Benton B.

Senior Financial Services Executive, Managing Director - Balance Sheet and Risk Management

4 年

I think it was Ayn Rand who said something like "inconsistencies can't hold". Similar to your point about tolerance.

回复
Mark Sander

Civil Servant at Government of Canada

4 年

Thanks for contributing to the conversation. I have to give what you have written sine considered thought.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

James Albers的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了