Understanding the Proposals to Legalise Assisted Dying in the UK
Mark Topps
Social Care Leader l Regional Business Manager | Co-Founder of The Caring View | Blogger | Award-Winning Care Mentor for Business Development, Mental Health, and Work-Life Balance
The debate over assisted dying has been a contentious issue in the UK for many years. Recently, new proposals have been put forward to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales.
On 11 November 2024, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was published. This bill makes provision for a person who is terminally ill and meets the eligibility criteria to choose to request and lawfully be provided with assistance to end their own life.
This blog aims to break down the key elements of these proposals to provide a clear understanding of what they entail.
Before we dive into this subject, if you have not already, please join over 9,700 people and subscribe here so that you receive future newsletters straight to your email inbox ??
What is Assisted Dying?
Assisted dying refers to the practice where a person with a terminal illness or incurable condition is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through prescribed medication. This is distinct from euthanasia, where a third party actively ends the person’s life.
Who would be eligible for assisted dying?
Under the bill, there are four criteria that must be met before a terminally ill person can be assisted to end their own life. The person must:
What is the process?
Ethical and Legal Considerations
The proposals have sparked significant debate, with strong arguments on both sides. One side of the argument is that legalising assisted dying provides a compassionate option for those suffering from terminal illnesses, allowing them to die with dignity and on their own terms. They emphasise the importance of personal autonomy and the right to choose.
Opponents, however, raise concerns about the potential for abuse and the moral implications of allowing assisted dying. They worry about the pressure it might place on vulnerable individuals and the possible erosion of trust in the medical profession. Some fear that legalising assisted dying could lead to a slippery slope, where the criteria for eligibility might gradually expand, potentially endangering more lives.
Looking at other countries where assisted dying is legal can provide valuable insights. Stats from the BBC revealed the following:
The Dignity in Dying campaign group says?more than 200 million people around the world have legal access to some form of assisted dying,?external .
Switzerland?has allowed assisted suicide since 1942 and its Dignitas facility began operating in 1998.
The organisation accepts foreign patients as well as Swiss nationals, and said it had 1,900 UK members in 2023, a 24% rise on the previous year.
Between 1998 and 2023?Dignitas helped 571 Britons to die,?external .
Assisted suicide is also legal in?Austria.
In the?US, 11 states - Oregon, California, New Mexico, Colorado, Washington, Hawaii, New Jersey, Vermont, Maine and Washington DC - allow "physician-assisted dying".
It permits doctors to prescribe lethal drugs for self-administration.
Voluntary euthanasia is legal in?Canada?where it is called medical assistance in dying. It can be provided by a doctor or nurse practitioner, either in person or through the prescription of drugs for self-administration.
It is also legal in?Spain?and?Colombia, both of which also permit assisted suicide.
Assisted dying is legal in some parts of Australia but the law differs across states. It is not permitted in either the Northern or Australian Capital territories.
New Zealand's?End of Life Choice Act legalises assisted dying and allows adults in their final months of life to request assistance from a medical professional.
Three countries have laws that allow people who are not terminally ill to receive assistance to die:?The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.
Final Thoughts
The proposed bill to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales would be a significant shift in the approach to end-of-life care. Whilst it has the potential to provide a compassionate option for those suffering from terminal illnesses, it is crucial government proceed with caution. I do feel that there is a huge amount of criticism for this bill and we cannot ignore the critics who argue that more time is needed to thoroughly examine the potential implications and to ensure that all voices, including those of vulnerable groups and healthcare professionals, are heard.
I am also concerned that we have both a failing health and social care system and can either cope with something new like this in the mix.
The goal must be to create a law that is both compassionate and robust to ensure we provide dignity and choice whilst protecting the most vulnerable members of society.
Do you support the assisted dying bill?
If you enjoyed this blog and want to join over 9,700 people who receive these straight to their emails, please subscribe here ??
Head of Quality & Compliance. Views expressed here are my own and not those of my employer.
1 天前Providing the safeguards and processes are sufficient, I’m all for choice.
Passionate about changing the face of Social Care , Promoting the support , professionalisation, respect and recognition of the Social Care Workforce
4 天前I would like to see a real debate ... That involves policy makers, lay and medics. as Julie Garrity says it is about choice. However, safeguards must be put in place to protect the vulnerable. But Switzerland have done...so we know it's possible. Personally, ok would like to see this ok legalised so everyone ( with capacity) has choice
Independent health and social care advisor. Author of Stay calm it’s only a CQC inspection
5 天前Yes I want the choice, I wouldn’t leave a Pet to suffer, why would I want that for me. I may never use the option but it would comfort me to know I could. I’m keen to have safeguards in place but it’s my choice otherwise I might resort to less comfortable options as some people do when they are frightened
The Mary Poppins of Social Care, now online too!
6 天前In a word NO. Whenever I discuss this with most people the reasons for stem from poor end of life care, not positive choice. Even if all the safeguards were adhered to ( do we really think two Dr's can be available who truly know the person?) How can we ever be sure there is no subtle coercion? Society in general coerces people into believing they are a 'burden', only once we stop this attitude can we begin to consider non coercion.
Care Quality Consultant - Adult Social Care, Regulation 44 Independent Visitor ( Children Services)
6 天前I wrote an article last week describing the dilemmas of Assited Dying on healthcare professionals with such a diverse multi faith and culture workforce in the country. While staff can exercise conscientious objection... Will they be denying patients the patient's wishes by refusing to participate. I will tag you into my article for feedback .