Understanding Permanent Establishment: A Guide to International Taxation for Businesses

Global business has evolved over centuries, leading to the development of standardized concepts in trade, economics, and taxation. One such key concept is?Permanent Establishment?(PE), widely accepted in international taxation. PE determines when a business from one country becomes liable for taxes in another due to its economic activities there. This concept is crucial in establishing tax jurisdiction and ensuring foreign businesses are taxed fairly on profits generated within a particular country.

What is Permanent Establishment (PE)?

Permanent Establishment (PE) is a fundamental concept in international taxation, determining when a company from one country is deemed to have a taxable presence in another. PE arises when a business has a substantial and continuous connection with a foreign country, typically through a fixed place of business, such as an office, factory, or branch.

It can also be triggered by the presence of dependent agents in the foreign country who act on the company's behalf, especially if they have authority to negotiate or conclude contracts. Additionally, regular and significant business activities, such as selling goods or providing services tied to the local market, may also establish a PE. Once a PE is established, the foreign country gains the right to tax the income attributable to the business activities conducted within its jurisdiction.

Potential Challenges that may arise in determination of PE

? ? ? ? a.????? A subsidiary company usually does not, by its mere presence, create PE for its parent company. However, if the subsidiary has rooms or premises that the parent uses to do its own business, then such rooms or premises may be considered as constituting PE for the parent company. This would mean that the parent company may be subject to taxes in a country where the subsidiary resides, depending on the amount of activities carried from the subsidiary place.

? ? ? ? b.????? A facility used only for warehousing, displaying, or distributing the goods of a business enterprise and keeping a stock of goods for similar purposes or for manufacture by another enterprise normally will not be considered a PE. In addition, a permanent place of business established solely for the acquisition of goods or for obtaining information or for other preliminary or auxiliary activities is also normally not considered to be a PE.

? ? ? ? c.?????? A PE must be tied to a geographical location and thus cannot be merely an ad-hoc arrangement. As a rule, to qualify as a PE, some level of permanence in the place of business is required. If a business has operations in a country from a certain location for less than six months, it's unlikely to be treated as PE. However, if that location is used for more than six months in duration, then generally it is treated as PE. So, though there are some variations, the general rule of thumb is the six-month guideline.

? ? ? ? d.????? A nonresident, alien individual or a foreign corporation shall not be treated as having an office or fixed place of business merely because the former uses some other person's office, even though such other person be related to the former. This shall apply only if such business activities are carried out only infrequently or sporadically. If you are not frequently carrying on substantial business out of that place, then it does not amount to permanent establishment.

Permanent Establishments and Tax Treaties

Tax treaties are also known as double tax treaties or double taxation avoidance agreements. They are international agreements entered into by countries since you must not be taxed on the same income twice. Such treaties lay clear rules for taxing an individual's income, which may hold permanent establishment in another country. They define what permanent establishment is and describe the subject under which the generated income is taxed. In addition to this, such treaties offer ways to minimize or eliminate double taxation, so that one can offset the taxes paid in one country against the taxes payable in another. Awareness of such treaties would be indispensable for you as a foreign company because that could reduce your tax burden to a considerable extent and could provide greater clarity to your tax matters.

Incidence of taxation in case of a permanent establishment?

To the extent a US person sets up a Permanent Establishment within another country, that US person may face double taxation-many to that other country -while also being taxed to the US. A PE is an immovable place of business; examples include a producer's office and a factory. Even though you are not repatriating income generated, you are responsible for paying US taxes on that income. It is likely to be a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) if you hold more than 50% of the foreign company, so you might still have to pay U.S. tax rules like GILTI. In addition, tax treaties both between the U.S. and the foreign country reduce the double taxation risks. Example: suppose you open a coffee shop business in France, that shop would be considered a PE. You will report and pay U.S. taxes on the income, retaining earnings in France, for instance; otherwise, if you own 100% of the coffee shop, it is a CFC and subject to the special rules of the U.S. tax code. The U.S.-France treaty may further minimize double taxation on the same income in either country.

Business Profits Attributable to a Permanent Establishment

We can understand this with an example like Foreign Corporation was carrying out business in the U.S. and selling a variety of products through a Permanent Establishment (PE). There existed a tax treaty between the U.S. and the Netherlands Antilles effective till 1 January 1988 and hence, the U.S. could tax the income only when it is earned within its borders. Thus, all sales to U.S. customers made prior to March 18, 1986, were considered foreign sourced; thus, was exempt from U.S. taxes on that income.

But then on March 18, 1986, new rules with regard to taxation were enacted. These provisions held that if an alien corporation had a U.S. office, and through negotiation or solicitation, substantially contributed to the creation of sales, then income from such sales would be sourced in the United States and therefore taxed. And so if its U.S. office materially contributed to the generation of sales after this date, it would be liable for United States tax on that income.

In summary, income derived from sales made before March 18, 1986, was not taxable by the United States, but if the U.S. office participated in sales on or after such date, then such income was taxable. This was another case where international tax rules really needed to be understood for foreign businesses located in the U.S.

All this simply means that Permanent Establishment is something a business should know about since it impacts tax liabilities and compliance. To seek quality expert advice on navigating through these complexities, please get in touch with our company Water & Shark. We help you maximize your international business approach.