Understanding the MFN Clause and Section 90 of the Income Tax Act in the India-Singapore DTAA - Insights from the Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore)

Cross-border transactions and income earned in multiple jurisdictions can lead to a complex web of regulations and treaties in international taxation. As a primary measure to mitigate the burden of double taxation for taxpayers, India has entered into Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) with a diverse array of countries. Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is of the utmost importance in this context, as it allows the Indian government to enter into these agreements in order to mitigate the adverse effects of double taxation.

?

In the case of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore), the most recent judgement by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) offers a significant understanding of the applicability of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause and Section 90 in the India-Singapore DTAA. Particularly in the context of guaranteeing that businesses can operate with a degree of certainty regarding their tax obligations, this case is an indispensable reference point for understanding the interpretation and enforcement of international tax treaties in India.

?

Legal Framework: Section 90 of the Income Tax Act

?

Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, authorises the Indian government to execute agreements with foreign nations or designated territories in order to:

?

§? To reduce the aggregate tax burden on taxpayers who conduct international transactions, it is necessary to prevent the taxation of the same income in two distinct jurisdictions.

§? In order to prevent the abuse of tax treaties, it is necessary to establish explicit regulations for the taxation of income that crosses borders.

§? To establish a framework for the exchange of information and the provision of assistance in the collection of taxes between countries.

?

Additionally, these agreements are frequently referred to as DTAAs. For income that has already been taxed in one of the contracting states, DTAAs typically offer exemptions or reduced tax rates. In the presence of a DTAA, a taxpayer is permitted to elect to be taxed under the provisions of the domestic law or the DTAA, whichever is more advantageous.

?

The MFN Clause and Key Provisions of the India-Singapore DTAA

?

The India-Singapore DTAA, like other treaties, is designed to deter the double taxation of income and promote economic cooperation between the two countries. The tax rates and income categories to which they apply are specified in this treaty.

?

Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Clause:

?

Critical to the India-Singapore DTAA is the MFN clause. In essence, the MFN clause ensures that Singapore will receive the same favourable treatment as India in the event that India agrees to a more favourable tax treatment with another country after the DTAA with Singapore has been signed. MFN clauses are intended to ensure that tax rates are applied consistently and equitably across all nations.

?

As an illustration, Singapore should automatically apply the lower rate in the event that India executes a DTAA with another nation that imposes a lower withholding tax rate on interest, royalties, or fees for technical services than the India-Singapore DTAA.

?

According to the relevant provision of the India-Singapore DTAA, any subsequent agreement that India signs with a member country of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) that provides a more advantageous tax treatment should be automatically extended to Singapore.

?

Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Case Dispute

?

The Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) case was primarily concerned with whether Standard Chartered Bank could invoke the MFN clause in the India-Singapore DTAA to claim a reduced tax rate on specific categories of income.

?

Argument of the Bank:

?

It was argued by Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) that it was entitled to the same reduced withholding tax rates that India had agreed upon in its DTAAs with certain European countries that are members of the OECD under the MFN clause. The bank contended that the income generated by the bank's Indian operations should be immediately subject to the reduced tax rates on interest and other forms of income that India had established through agreements with countries such as France and the Netherlands.

?

Tax authorities' situation:

?

The tax authorities of India contended that the benefits provided by the MFN clause were not self-executing. Their argument was that the MFN clause could only be enforced if a specific notification or amendment to the India-Singapore DTAA explicitly stated the extension of the reduced tax rates to Singapore. According to the authorities, Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) was not entitled to automatically claim the lower rates offered in other DTAAs in the absence of such a notification.

?

The ITAT's Decision: A Comprehensive Analysis

?

A thorough examination of the language and intent of the MFN clause in the India-Singapore DTAA was conducted by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The decision of the ITAT was considered significant for a variety of reasons:

?

By the ITAT, the MFN clause was considered to be self-executing. According to the tribunal, the clause should be enforced in accordance with its uncomplicated and natural interpretation, without the need for any further notification or modification. The MFN clause was formulated to guarantee that Singapore is accorded equitable tax treatment by extending the benefits of reduced tax rates that have been jointly established with other OECD member countries.

?

The Tribunal emphasised that the primary objective of Section 90 and DTAAs is to ensure stability and certainty in tax matters, thereby promoting international trade and investment and eliminating double taxation. According to the ITAT, the MFN clause's efficacy and effectiveness would be undermined by the necessity of supplementary procedural steps, including notifications.

?

Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) was eligible for the reduced tax rates under the MFN clause of the India-Singapore DTAA, as determined by the ITAT. Even in the absence of any specific notification that extended these benefits to Singapore, the ruling clarified that the bank was permitted to implement the reduced withholding tax rates that were applicable under India's DTAAs with specific European countries.

?

In line with other judicial precedents, the ITAT's decision was in favour of an interpretation of tax treaties that furthers their fundamental purpose. The tribunal cited prior court decisions that have established that the provisions of tax treaties should be interpreted liberally to prevent double taxation and to ensure that the treaties achieve their intended purpose.

?

The Results of the ITAT’s Decision

?

The Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) case and the ITAT's decision have significant implications for both tax authorities and taxpayers.

?

Taxpayers who operate in multiple jurisdictions, particularly those who are endeavouring to claim benefits under the MFN clauses of DTAAs, are provided with clarity and certainty by the decision. The MFN clause's uncomplicated language underscores the fact that taxpayers can rely on it without the need for additional procedural formalities.

?

The anticipated outcome of this decision is that it will encourage additional taxpayers to assess their DTAAs and ascertain whether they can obtain comparable benefits from MFN clauses in their own treaties.

?

Tax authorities are reminded by the ruling that DTAAs should be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with their intended purpose of preventing double taxation and promoting international economic cooperation. Additionally, the decision suggests that tax authorities may need to reassess their approach to the enforcement of MFN clauses, particularly in terms of requiring additional notifications or amendments.

?

The case further solidifies the principle that tax treaties should be interpreted in a manner that promotes their fundamental objectives, thereby contributing to the broader corpus of international tax jurisprudence. In particular, the ruling supports a liberal interpretation of treaty provisions that are designed to guarantee equitable tax treatment across a variety of jurisdictions.

?

To conclude, the Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) case provides a critical examination of the applicability of the MFN clause and Section 90 of the Income Tax Act in the India-Singapore DTAA. The ruling of the ITAT emphasises the importance of interpreting tax treaties in a manner that is consistent with their intended purpose, which is to prevent double taxation and facilitate international trade and investment.

?

The importance of undertaking a comprehensive examination of the provisions of DTAAs and considering the potential benefits that multinational companies and tax professionals may receive under MFN clauses is underscored by this verdict. The ruling also serves as a reminder that tax authorities must exercise caution when enforcing treaty provisions, ensuring that their interpretation is consistent with the overarching objectives of fostering economic cooperation and preventing double taxation.

?

As international transactions become more intricate, the principles established in this case will become more relevant, offering guidance to both taxpayers and tax authorities in the interpretation and application of international tax treaties.