Understanding the logic of rebel restraint on landmine use
Geneva Call monitoring the destruction of stockpiled anti-personnel mines by the Polisario Front, Western Sahara, 2011. Photo credit: Geneva Call.

Understanding the logic of rebel restraint on landmine use

Non-state armed groups (NSAGs) have become the most frequent users of landmines and the main drivers of new landmine contamination. Often portrayed as the “perfect soldier” due to their low cost, easy availability, and high lethality, landmines have become the weapon of choice of many rebel groups. An initial assessment by Geneva Call reported that, in 2005, at least sixty rebel groups in twenty-four countries had used mines. In contrast with state governments, rebels have considerably less incentives to comply with existing humanitarian norms. Engaging them in restricting or renouncing the use of landmines remains one of the most pressing practical obstacles toward a mine-free world.

My article recently published on the Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction aims to enhance the understanding of different incentives and dynamics at play on rebel behavior. Insights on this field could inform government authorities, civil-society organizations, and advocacy groups when engaging with NSAGs.

For the full article, click here.

Natan Cerqueira

Currently studying Divinity.

4 年

Parabéns pela publica??o, Garbino!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Henrique Garbino的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了