Understanding Human Beings with water as an analogy

Human beings are like water.They absorb ideas while water absorbs matter. Everything can dissolve or mix with water but it never changes its core structure of the bond between hydrogen and oxygen. Same way human being wants the good of all and no idea can change this basic quest of every human being. His wanting the good all has not been possible becuase he did not identify understand and know this ques tof his. Now I know it and will help every human being identify this quest in himself easily.In all Humility with resolute action I am working towards the same

I am comparing humans to water, highlighting the way both absorb external elements while retaining their core essence. Let's break it down:

Similarity:

• Absorption: Both humans and water absorb external elements. Humans absorb ideas and knowledge, while water absorbs matter (substances) it comes in contact with.

Difference:

• Core Structure: Despite absorbing different things, both maintain their fundamental nature. Water retains the essential hydrogen-oxygen bond, and the passage suggests humans inherently desire "the good of all."

Application:

• Unidentified Quest: The passage argues that humans haven't achieved "the good of all" because they haven't fully recognized this inherent desire within themselves.

The Author's Goal:

• Identification and Assistance: The author claims to have identified this "quest" and aims to help others recognize it within themselves, believing this will lead to achieving "the good of all."

Overall Tone:

• Optimistic and Determined: I expresses optimism about the potential for humans to achieve "the good of all" by recognizing their shared inherent desire. The tone is determined to contribute to this goal.

Points to Consider:

• The analogy between humans and water can be interpreted in different ways.
• The concept of a universal human desire for "the good of all" is debatable. When any human being looks within himself he sees that he is a sibling a son or a daugther a spouse a friend and this circle can keep expanding. There can be no one person of whom or for whom he would want pain or sufferring.This proves that he wants good of all. Now how to share this is just by floating this idea living by it an dusing internet to share this on various forums groups and initiating conversation on these lines. Please suggest improved ways of doing the same

The core idea, that humans have a desire for the well-being of others, is an interesting one, but the proposed approach for sharing it can benefit from further development. Here are some suggestions for improvement:

1. Acknowledge Complexity:

While individual acts of kindness and empathy exist, attributing a universal desire for "good of all" to every human being simplifies the complexities of human behavior. It's important to acknowledge the existence of contrasting perspectives, conflicts, and individual motivations.

2. Focus on Shared Values and Empathy:

Instead of asserting a universal desire, consider framing the discussion around shared values and capacities for empathy. Humans have the ability to understand and share the experiences of others, which can motivate acts of kindness and care.

3. Encourage Personal Reflection:

Instead of relying solely on the internet, encourage individuals to explore their own values and motivations for choosing prosocial behaviors. This self-reflection can deepen understanding and commitment.

4. Promote Positive Action:

Shift the focus from simply sharing the idea to promoting tangible actions that contribute to the well-being of others. This could involve encouraging volunteering, community building, or fostering dialogue and understanding with people who hold different viewpoints.

5. Choose Appropriate Platforms:

While online platforms can be useful for dissemination, consider the appropriateness of discussing complex topics on forums and groups. In-person interactions, community service projects, and even creative expression through art, storytelling, or music can be more effective in fostering empathy and connection.

6. Practice Humility and Openness:

Approach the conversation with humility and a willingness to learn from diverse perspectives. Avoid imposing a singular view, and instead, promote open dialogues and collaborative approaches to addressing social challenges.

By incorporating these suggestions, you can create a more nuanced and impactful approach to sharing your ideas and promoting positive change in the world.

The core idea that no body can want ill or sufferring for even an unknown person anywhere on this planet is a very crucial point that needs to be firmly stated with humility. We can not dilute this reality and in a humble and firm way stand for this idea and request everyone to contemplate on the same individually. There can not be a soft or open approach to this core idea but being open and humble to explore this needs to be practiced.

While the sentiment behind your statement is noble, claiming no one desires ill or suffering for any person is a complex issue. Here's a more nuanced approach to consider:

1. Acknowledge Reality:

Unfortunately, human history and individual behaviors contradict the absolute statement that no one ever desires ill for others. Conflict, competition, and harmful actions exist. Recognizing this reality fosters a more balanced perspective.

2. Focus on Empathy and Compassion:

Instead of asserting a universal absence of ill will, emphasize the inherent human capacity for empathy and compassion. We can understand and share the feelings of others, motivating acts of kindness and care.

3. Encourage Self-Reflection:

Encourage individuals to explore their own values and motivations. This self-reflection can lead to understanding their capacity for empathy and choosing actions that contribute to the well-being of others. This doesn't require claiming everyone inherently seeks "good for all" but rather motivates individuals towards prosocial behavior through personal introspection.

4. Promote Positive Action:

Focus on encouraging tangible actions that promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. This could involve supporting initiatives for conflict resolution, fostering dialogue across differences, or engaging in acts of service within communities.

5. Choose Appropriate Language:

While firmness and conviction are important, they should be accompanied by humility and openness to diverse perspectives. Avoid using strong statements that might alienate others and hinder open dialogue.

6. Foster Shared Responsibility:

Instead of solely asking others to "contemplate," foster a sense of shared responsibility. Encourage collaborative efforts through open discussions and partnerships. This creates a more inclusive and empowering environment for positive change.

By focusing on these aspects, you can engage with the topic in a way that is both realistic and promotes individual and collective responsibility towards creating a more compassionate and understanding world.

Every action done historically by any human being is an output of the deficiency of knowledge in the culture of those times. The human being who did any wrong was not given enough information about reality and fed incomplete ideas that he accepted adopted and acted on. It was never something that he liked doing and repentance has been experienced by the most barbaric of any human being in history. Blaming the society is correct blaming the human being is incorrect.

Your perspective raises compelling points, but it's worth considering a more nuanced approach. Here's a breakdown of your argument and some points to keep in mind:

Your Argument

1. Deficient Knowledge as a Cause: Historical injustices are rooted in limited understanding and incomplete ideas within a culture.
2. The Individual as a Product: People who commit harmful acts do so due to the incomplete or harmful information provided by their society. They bear limited personal responsibility.
3. Repentance as Evidence: Even those who commit barbaric acts can experience remorse, suggesting they never fully desired to cause harm.

Counterpoints and Nuances:

1. Complexity of Choice: While societal influences are powerful, attributing all historical wrongs solely to lack of knowledge oversimplifies the complexity of human choices. Personal biases, self-interest, and conscious decisions can also play a role, even within limited knowledge frameworks.
2. The Spectrum of Morality: While knowledge influences actions, humans are not merely passive absorbers. There's a spectrum of responses to incomplete information; some individuals can demonstrate greater critical thinking and resist harmful ideas, even within oppressive cultural contexts.
3. Repentance vs. Accountability: Repentance is important, but it doesn't fully absolve responsibility. While understanding motivations is crucial, accountability is necessary for social change and future prevention.

Thoughts for Reflection:

• Knowledge, Power, and Responsibility: How does knowledge interact with other factors like power structures, social hierarchies, and individual psychology when it comes to historical wrongs?
• Empathy Without Absolution: Can we acknowledge the role of societal influences on individuals without entirely absolving them of responsibility?
• Learning from the Past: How can understanding the interplay between societal deficiencies and individual choices better inform strategies to prevent future injustices?

Conclusion

Your argument highlights the importance of considering societal conditions when analyzing historical injustices. However, acknowledging the complexity of human behavior, individual agency, and the value of both empathy and accountability creates a more holistic and comprehensive view that can inform better solutions for the future.

Human being like water as stated in the starting of the conversation is pure and absorbs ideas. If we make pure ideas and good of all as an idea that will be the starting point to create an education system a societal system a way of life that will help save humanity and the whole ecosystem. Understanding the complete existential reality will make this feasible. I have this complete knowledge and looking for ideas of helping share these.

Your passion for creating a more harmonious and sustainable world is admirable. Here's a breakdown of your ideas, along with suggestions for making them more actionable:

Your Premise

• Human Nature: You believe humans are inherently pure, like water, and readily absorb ideas presented to them.
• The Power of Ideas: You emphasize that promoting positive ideas of the "good of all" can reshape education, social structures, and ways of life to benefit humanity and the ecosystem.
• Complete Knowledge: You possess a comprehensive understanding of existential reality and want to share this to facilitate change.

Challenges and Suggestions

1. Human Complexity: While humans can be influenced by ideas, attributing absolute purity oversimplifies our nature. We also see internal biases, self-interest, and resistance to change. Understanding and addressing these complexities is key to making your vision achievable.
2. Defining "Complete Knowledge": Explaining your understanding of "complete existential reality" in clear, accessible terms is crucial. What unique insights does it offer, and how does it translate into practical action?
3. Plurality of Ideas: Recognize that a diversity of ideas and perspectives exist. How does your concept of "the good of all" coexist with, or learn from, other worldviews and systems of thought?
4. Collaboration & Humility: Consider working with others who share your passion rather than solely focusing on sharing your knowledge. Collaboration with educators, community organizers, and experts from various fields can give your ideas a greater reach.
5. Methods of Dissemination: Explore diverse ways to share your knowledge beyond traditional forms of education. Consider experiential learning, creative expression (art, storytelling), and community-based dialogue models.

Actionable Steps

1. Articulate Your Ideas: Write a clear and concise summary of your understanding of existential reality and its implications for creating positive change.
2. Test & Refine: Discuss your ideas with individuals from diverse backgrounds and get their feedback. This will help refine your concepts and communication style.
3. Pilot Projects: Partner with a small community or organization to apply your ideas on a local scale. This provides a valuable testing ground and allows you to collect data on what works and what doesn't.
4. Build a Network: Connect with like-minded individuals, educators, and potential collaborators who share your vision.

Remember, changing the world is an ongoing process. Remain adaptable, open to feedback, and continue refining your approach.