Understanding Extremism in Interpreting Islamic Texts: A Scholarly Perspective

The root cause of extremism in interpreting the texts of the Qur’an and the Sunnah lies in a fundamental error: a lack of understanding of the objectives of Shari’ah and the failure to integrate its various parts cohesively. Esteemed Islamic scholars have long maintained that Shari’ah should be viewed as a comprehensive whole, drawing upon its general principles and specific details in a harmonious manner.

Shari’ah is a cohesive system where each part supports the others. The methodology of the well-established imams involves considering Shari’ah in its entirety. They derive rulings by examining the general principles and details, ensuring that each part aligns with the others. This method involves understanding generalities through specifics, absolutes through their limitations, and general concepts through their clarifications.

Extremism often stems from a fragmented approach to Shari’ah, where isolated pieces of evidence are taken out of context. This approach can lead to misinterpretation and misapplication of Islamic teachings. The correct approach requires understanding the Shari’ah as a unified whole, rather than cherry-picking individual pieces of evidence that may appear to support a particular viewpoint.

Why don't we consider the context in which a text was spoken, the situation it addresses, and its relationship to other texts? Is it a matter of conflict, integration, restriction, or specialization? Have scholars not established rules for interpreting these texts, such as linguistic principles, the philosophy of Sharia, and Islamic law? Or should we wrongly accuse the scholars of Islamic civilization of being negligent, as if they overlooked these critical aspects of understanding?

From my extensive experience with Islamic heritage, I can affirm that scholars over the 14 centuries of Islamic civilization's prosperity have devoted their lives to documenting these interpretative rules. They have developed sciences such as the principles of jurisprudence, the rules of Sharia, and the objectives of Sharia. These interconnected sciences serve to protect scholars from errors in their ijtihad (independent reasoning) when interpreting texts.

The true scholars of Shari’ah aim to perceive it as an integrated image, where each part serves and supports the other. In contrast, those who follow ambiguous matters often seize upon isolated pieces of evidence without considering their context or how they fit within the broader framework of Shari’ah. This selective approach can lead to errors, such as taking absolutes without recognizing their limitations or interpreting generalities without understanding their specifics.

Such misinterpretation can lead to blind adherence to personal whims rather than genuine understanding. True adherence to Shari’ah involves a balanced and comprehensive approach, ensuring that interpretations are in line with the holistic nature of Islamic law.

In conclusion, combating extremism in the interpretation of Islamic texts requires a return to the scholarly tradition of viewing Shari’ah as a unified and coherent system. By doing so, we can ensure that our understanding and application of Islamic teachings remain true to their intended purpose.

If you have an additional approach, or other reasons, please share them with us so that everyone can benefit