Understanding Expected Credit Loss for Enterprise Finance

Understanding Expected Credit Loss for Enterprise Finance

The goal of the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) method is to assess credit risk and determine provisions for potential losses within co-lending portfolios. By adhering to IFRS 9 guidelines, the method ensures timely and accurate provisioning based on the risk profile of loans, enhancing the ability to manage and mitigate credit risk effectively.

Abstract:

The Expected Credit Loss (ECL) model is a forward-looking framework that assesses credit risk by considering a borrower’s likelihood of default, the exposure at the time of default, and the expected recovery following default. Utilizing historical data, borrower characteristics, and predictive modelling techniques, the ECL method provides precise estimates of potential credit losses. This empowers us to proactively allocate provisions, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards, and enabling more informed, data-driven decision-making.

Method:

Definition: ECL is a method of accounting for credit risk that is based on the loss that is likely to occur on a loan or portfolio of loans.

Expected Credit Loss = PD*EAD*LGD

Probability of Default (PD): Calculated by estimating the forward-looking probability of default for each loan.

Loss given default (LGD): The percentage loss that is expected to occur if the borrower defaults.

Exposure at default (EAD): Expected loss for each loan.

Note: dpd = Days past dues

Data preparation:

A decision tree model is created where the target variable is Probability of Default (PD) - specifically, whether a borrower defaulted within 12 months or not. The model will segment borrowers based on the likelihood of default. The process works as follows:

  1. Root Node Selection: The decision tree selects the most critical factor (e.g., borrower’s credit score) to split the borrowers into two groups - those likely to default and those who are not.
  2. Branching: For each group, further splits are made based on other factors like POS to disbursement ratio, age, or payment history.
  3. Leaf Nodes: At the end of the tree (leaf nodes), predictions are made regarding the likelihood of default for each borrower.

Probability Estimation:

Once the decision tree is trained, each borrower is assigned a Probability of Default (PD) based on the leaf node in which they land. The PD for each borrower corresponds to the likelihood that the borrower will default within the next 12 months, based on their features.? The leaf node where a borrower land indicates their risk level: If a borrower ends up in a leaf where many others defaulted, a higher PD is predicted. If they end up in a leaf where defaults are rare, a lower PD is predicted.

Interpretation of the Decision Tree:

The decision tree provides insights into which factors are most predictive of default. By interpreting the tree, financial institutions can make informed lending decisions. For example, if the model shows that borrowers with lower credit scores and higher loan amounts are more likely to default, this can be used to adjust lending policies.

EAD and LGD Calculation Using the Decision Tree

After building the decision tree with PD as the target variable, the next step is to calculate EAD (Exposure at Default) and LGD (Loss Given Default). For each loan in the training set, input the actual EAD (loan principal) and LGD (expected loss given default) values into the decision tree.

  • Calculate Expected EAD: The Expected EAD is calculated by aggregating the exposure at default, relative to the principal amount of the defaulting loans in each risk category (leaf node) of the tree. Loans with a higher PD contribute more to the Expected EAD.
  • Calculate Expected LGD: The Expected LGD is calculated by aggregating the loss given default for each risk category (leaf node) of the decision tree, based on the sum of the latest outstanding and exposure at the time of first default. Borrowers with a higher PD typically have a higher LGD, indicating a greater loss in the event of default.




Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and is not an investment, financial, legal or tax advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the content, the author or publisher does not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information. Readers are advised to verify any information before making decisions based on it. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organization or entity mentioned.

Kiran S

CA | AVP Finance & Accounts at Northern Arc

5 天前

Whether PD in this model will calculate only 12m pd. If that is the case that will not suffice the requirement. For stage 1 loan 12m pd would be fine whereas for stage 2 and stage 3 loans balance tenor pd should he correct parameter. Portfolio should be bifurcated across stages.If particular loan is credit impaired and loan tenor is 4 yrs and expired tenor is 1 year then pd for this case 3 years pd and not 12m pd

回复
Siddhartha Barua

An astute and a competent banking professional, with professional experience of over 11 years across Mid Coporate,Commercial,Wealth & Merchant Banking and in the Credit Rating space.

5 天前

Very informative. This is what leads to RAROC calculations

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Vivriti Capital的更多文章