Understanding the Confusion Matrix

Machine learning is a rapidly evolving field that is increasingly becoming a crucial part of many industries. One of the key aspects of machine learning is the ability to make accurate predictions. To evaluate the performance of a machine learning model, we use various metrics, one of which is the Confusion Matrix.

What is a Confusion Matrix?

A Confusion Matrix, also known as an Error Matrix, is a specific table layout that allows visualization of the performance of an algorithm. It is a summary of prediction results on a classification problem. The number of correct and incorrect predictions is summarized with count values and broken down by each class.

Components of a Confusion Matrix

A confusion matrix consists of four main components:

1. True Positives (TP): These are cases in which we predicted yes (the event will occur), and it did occur.
2. True Negatives (TN): We predicted no, and no event occurred.
3. False Positives (FP) or Type I error: We predicted yes, but the event didn't occur. This is also known as a "Type I error."
4. False Negatives (FN) or Type II error: We predicted no, but the event did occur. This is also known as a "Type II error."

Use of a Confusion Matrix

The confusion matrix not only gives you insight into the mistakes being made by a classifier but also the types of mistakes that are being made. This breakdown helps you to better understand the performance of the model. It gives a more holistic view of how well our classification model is performing and what kinds of errors it is making.

Example of a Confusion Matrix

Let's take an example of a binary classification problem. We have a dataset of 165 patients. 105 of them have a disease, and 60 of them do not. Our model made some predictions. Here's the confusion matrix:

From the above confusion matrix, we can see that:

• The model correctly predicted that 100 patients have the disease (True Positives) and incorrectly predicted that 10 patients have the disease (False Positives).
• The model correctly predicted that 50 patients do not have the disease (True Negatives), and incorrectly predicted that 5 patients do not have the disease (False Negatives).

Click here to read my medium blog posts