Understanding concatMap vs. switchMap for Dispatching Multiple NgRx Actions
Vinay Jadhav
Tech Lead | Expert in Full Stack Development with Angular, Node.js, and Python | Proven People Management Skills | Azure Enthusiast
In the world of Angular and NgRx, managing asynchronous flows effectively is crucial. Two RxJS operators that often come up are concatMap and switchMap. While both help transform and manage streams of actions, their behavior differs significantly when handling multiple emissions.
?? The Basics
??? Code Examples
Below are simplified code samples (please refer to the attached images for code screenshots) that demonstrate how you might use each operator in an NgRx effect.
Using concatMap
// Example using concatMap in an NgRx effect
this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(loadData),
concatMap(action =>
this.dataService.getData(action.payload).pipe(
map(data => loadDataSuccess({ data })),
catchError(error => of(loadDataFailure({ error })))
)
)
);
Explanation:
Every loadData action is processed sequentially. If multiple actions are dispatched, each request waits for the previous one to finish, ensuring the order of responses is maintained.
领英推荐
Using switchMap
// Example using switchMap in an NgRx effect
this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(loadData),
switchMap(action =>
this.dataService.getData(action.payload).pipe(
map(data => loadDataSuccess({ data })),
catchError(error => of(loadDataFailure({ error })))
)
)
);
Explanation:
With switchMap, if a new loadData action comes in while the previous one is still in progress, the previous request is canceled. This approach is particularly useful for scenarios where only the latest action result is important.
When to Use Which?
Understanding these differences is key to designing robust state management flows with NgRx. The right choice depends on your specific use case—whether you prioritize order or responsiveness.
Let me know your thoughts on this article.