Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is increasingly relevant in civil and criminal litigation, but misconceptions about the condition often complicate legal proceedings. In this episode of Emotional Damages, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Ambarin Faizi sits down with autism expert Dr. Bryna Siegel to explore how ASD is assessed in forensic cases and what attorneys need to know when handling autism-related claims.
Dr. Siegel, a renowned researcher and forensic consultant, shares her insights on how autism is diagnosed, the role of neurodevelopmental history in forensic evaluations, and the impact of ASD on legal competency, trauma, and intent. She also discusses common misunderstandings about autism and the legal challenges that arise from self-diagnosis and misinformation.
- The Importance of Understanding ASD in Legal Contexts. Many people assume that an autism diagnosis alone is enough to explain behaviors or justify legal defenses, but Dr. Siegel emphasizes that the severity of ASD—and its specific impact on an individual’s cognitive and social functioning—must be carefully evaluated. In forensic cases, this means distinguishing between individuals who have clinically significant impairments versus those who may self-identify as autistic without a formal diagnosis.
- How ASD Affects Competency and Criminal Responsibility. Autistic individuals process social information differently, which can affect how they respond to legal situations. Dr. Siegel explains that some defendants with ASD may struggle with understanding intent, body language, or implied social rules. However, this does not mean they are incapable of distinguishing right from wrong—making forensic assessments crucial in determining competency to stand trial or criminal responsibility.
- The Role of Trauma and PTSD in ASD Cases. One of the most complex issues in autism-related litigation is how trauma is perceived and processed by individuals with ASD. Dr. Siegel notes that autistic individuals may have difficulty recalling traumatic events in the same way as neurotypical individuals, raising questions about the reliability of memory in testimony. In civil cases, this has implications for claims involving emotional distress and psychiatric damages.
- The Dangers of Self-Diagnosis and Misinformation. With increased awareness of autism, there has been a rise in self-diagnosis, often based on social media trends rather than clinical evaluation. Dr. Siegel warns that this can lead to false assumptions in legal cases, where a forensic expert must rely on objective developmental history rather than subjective self-reports. Attorneys working on ASD-related cases should ensure that diagnoses are based on comprehensive clinical assessments.
Understanding autism demands a nuanced approach that considers developmental history, cognitive function, and social comprehension. Attorneys handling cases involving ASD should work closely with forensic experts to assess competency, credibility, and the broader implications of an autism diagnosis in legal proceedings.
Listen, subscribe, and leave a review on:
Need support for an ongoing or upcoming case? fpamed’s team of forensic psychiatrists and psychologists is here to help. Reach out to [email protected] today for expert case support.
