Understanding the AI Results Sensitivity Scale

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and the explosion of AI-driven applications, a crucial concept known as prompt engineering has taken center stage. Prompt engineering focuses on formulating precise and structured commands in natural language that AI systems can interpret and respond to accurately. Unlike traditional programming, which requires specific coding languages, prompt engineering allows anyone to interact with AI using everyday language. In this article, we’ll explore a simplified breakdown of this process and highlight tips to help users get better results.

The process can be broken down into four essential stages:

1. User Input in Natural Language: The first stage is all about how the user communicates with the AI. The quality of the output hinges largely on how well the input is written. In prompt engineering, the key is clarity, specificity, and context. The more clearly you articulate your request, the better the AI will understand it.
2. Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Understanding (NLU): Once the prompt is submitted, the AI uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Natural Language Understanding (NLU) to break down the user’s input. These processes convert human language into a form the AI can analyze—typically through a series of algorithms and codes. While the technical details are complex, what's important for users to understand is that the clearer the input, the easier it is for the AI to process it correctly.
3. Execution within a Large Language Model (LLM): The converted input is then processed through a Large Language Model (LLM), which uses vast amounts of data and learned patterns to generate a response. The LLM analyzes the encoded instructions and creates new code that matches the user's request.
4. Output in Natural Language: Finally, the AI converts the coded response back into natural language. At this point, the AI presents the output, ideally mirroring the structure and intent of the original prompt. It’s important to remember that the AI is essentially a pattern-matching system—it provides results based on the clarity and quality of the input

In the table above, we break down the process of how artificial intelligence processes and generates outputs. However, our primary focus will be on the fourth point of the process—the output stage. Before diving into the details, let’s briefly summarize the first three stages with some real-world examples.

1. Case A: In this scenario, the user changes their inputs in natural language at stage 1, but there’s no noticeable impact on the output at stage 4. The results remain unchanged because the underlying commands are essentially the same as before, causing no meaningful alteration in the coding or AI output. This typically happens when the input lacks any significant variation or logical complexity.
2. Case B: In this case, the user alters the input, leading to a change in the underlying code. However, the large language model processes this change in a similar way as before. The issue here often lies in either the quality of the user’s input or the limitations of the AI system, preventing the model from generating a noticeably different output despite changes in the input.
3. Case C: In this case, the user changes the input, resulting in a modification in the coding and even in the new coding produced by the large language model. However, the final output, when presented in natural language, remains unchanged. This often occurs in situations involving arithmetic or logical operations where the final result remains consistent, even though the input has been phrased differently.

4. Case D: AI Results Sensitivity Scale

This is the core of what we will focus on in this article. Any changes made in the user's initial inputs (stage 1) result in changes to the final output (stage 4). The process involves alterations at stage 2 (user inputs coding) and stage 3 (processing within the large language model). This is where the AI Results Sensitivity Scale comes into play, measuring how much a change in input affects the final results. Below are 10 points to consider, along with examples:

1. The main goal you want to achieve: This defines the specific objective the user aims to accomplish with the AI. If the main goal is clearly defined, the model is more likely to generate accurate results.

Example:

1. If your main goal is to “Get a summary of a 5-page article on climate change,” the AI will focus on this specific request.
2. If the goal is less clear, such as “Tell me about climate change,” the output could vary widely, depending on the language model’s interpretation of the request.

2. The main points that the language model will depend on to process the main goal: These are the critical elements that guide the model in fulfilling the request. Omitting or altering these points can drastically change the output.

Example:

• Asking for a “Summary focusing on the economic impacts of climate change” vs. a “Summary focusing on scientific research about climate change” will result in entirely different outputs.
• Including “Focus on case studies from Europe” vs. “Focus on global case studies” narrows or broadens the scope of the final output.

3. The methods used to address this problem: The approaches or techniques the AI should employ to fulfill the request. Varying these methods can lead to a difference in the level of detail or focus.

Example:

• Asking the AI to “Generate a formal, detailed report” vs. “Give me a quick bullet-point list” changes how the AI processes the information and presents it.
• Requesting “Use statistical data to support the arguments” vs. “Provide anecdotal evidence” also leads to significantly different outputs.

4. Prohibitions: These are restrictions on what the AI should avoid when processing the request. Adding or removing prohibitions can lead to unwanted or unexpected results.

Example:

• “Do not include political opinions in the summary” ensures that the AI stays neutral.
• “Avoid using technical jargon” changes how the information is conveyed, ensuring it's more accessible to a general audience.

5. The shape of the final result: This refers to the expected format or presentation of the output. Changes in this aspect can dramatically alter how the information is organized and delivered.

Example:

• “Present the result as a paragraph” vs. “Provide the information in a table format” changes the structure of the output.
• “Create a formal research paper” vs. “Generate a casual blog post” shifts the tone and complexity of the final product.

6. Default values: These are the pre-set values or assumptions that the AI uses if the input doesn't specify otherwise. Adjusting these can cause small but noticeable shifts in output.

Example:

• Defaulting to "United States" as the region for a weather forecast vs. specifying "France" will change the AI's focus.
• Assuming a date range of “the past year” vs. “the past five years” in a financial report drastically affects the final data set presented.

7. Using the IF state: Conditional instructions allow for more flexibility in responses. They introduce variables that can influence how the AI interprets and handles the input.

Example:

• “If the user asks about climate change, mention recent IPCC reports” vs. “If no specific region is mentioned, default to North America” adds layers of specificity to the final result.
• “If the budget exceeds $10,000, offer a 5% discount” creates a rule that adjusts the output based on the initial condition.

8. Slots: These are placeholders for specific pieces of information that need to be filled in. Depending on how these are populated, the AI output can vary.

Example:

• A slot for [Company Name] in a proposal will adjust the language to be company-specific when filled. “Dear [Client Name], thank you for your inquiry...” becomes more personalized.
• Using a slot for [Product Type] in a marketing message will switch the description of products based on what's inputted, like "Laptop" vs. "Smartphone."

9. Restricted or conditional instructions: These place limits on how the AI should operate under certain conditions. Altering these can have a huge impact on output quality.

Example:

• “Only include results from peer-reviewed journals” vs. “Allow results from any credible source” changes the scope and reliability of the final information.
• “Only process inputs longer than 500 words” vs. “Process inputs of any length” affects the complexity of the analysis.

10. General instructions: These are broad directives that provide overarching guidance to the AI. The more general or vague the instruction, the more variability there is in the result.

Example:

• “Create a comprehensive guide on AI” vs. “Write a brief introduction to AI for beginners” will lead to different levels of detail.
• “Summarize this article” vs. “Give me the three main takeaways from this article” changes how the AI filters and condenses information.

understanding and applying the AI Results Sensitivity Scale can greatly enhance the effectiveness of your interactions with AI systems. By paying close attention to how small changes in your inputs affect the final output, you can gain more control over the results and fine-tune them to better suit your needs. As AI technology continues to advance, mastering these nuances will become essential for anyone looking to achieve precise, reliable outcomes from their AI-driven tools.

• If you like this article subscribe to my YouTube channel: AI Economy Channel (AI ECO)
• For building an AI Assistant DM me