Un-Suck your change control process in 15 minutes.

You want to be a good hacker?

Run a good change control board - here’s how.

component in the framework promote effective collaboration and decision-making, ensuring that changes are properly assessed, documented, and implemented. This scalability enables businesses to handle a larger volume of change requests, maintain control over the change process, and mitigate risks associated with unauthorized or poorly managed changes.

Overall, this change control framework provides businesses with a scalable and structured approach to manage changes, fostering efficiency, transparency, and effective communication among stakeholders involved in the change management process.

```mermaid

graph LR

??

A[Primary Work Role ID] -- has --> B[Description]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -- has --> C[Email]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -- has --> D[Problem]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -- has --> E[Change]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -- has --> F[Request]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -- has --> G[Incident]

```

```mermaid

graph LR

??

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| B[Description]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| C[Email]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| D[Problem]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| E[Change]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| F[Request]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| G[Incident]

B[Description] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

C[Email] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

D[Problem] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

E[Change] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

F[Request] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

G[Incident] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

```

The graph represents a process where a primary work role ID is associated with various components, namely description, email, problem, change, request, and incident. Each component has a "has" relationship with the primary work role ID, indicating that it is owned or linked to that specific work role. Additionally, there is an "associated with" relationship between each component and the primary work role ID, suggesting a connection or relevance between them.

This process demonstrates a systematic approach to organizing and managing information related to a primary work role ID. By capturing and categorizing relevant details, such as the description, email, problem, change, request, and incident, businesses can gain better visibility and understanding of the responsibilities, tasks, and issues associated with a particular work role.

The "has" relationships indicate that the primary work role ID serves as a container or holder for the various components. This structure promotes clarity and organization, enabling easy identification and retrieval of information related to a specific work role.

The "associated with" relationships highlight the connection between the primary work role ID and its associated components. This implies that the components are closely related to or impacted by the primary work role ID. For example, the description, email, problem, change, request, and incident are associated with the primary work role ID, suggesting that they are either inputs, outputs, or attributes of that work role.

Overall, this process provides a clear representation of the relationships and associations between a primary work role ID and its related components. It offers a visual framework for understanding the dependencies, interactions, and responsibilities associated with a specific work role within a larger context. This analysis can aid in process improvement, resource allocation, and decision-making, ultimately enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in managing work roles and their associated tasks and issues.

Trouble Ticket Flow

??

```mermaid

graph LR

A[User] -- Creates --> B[Trouble Ticket]

B[Trouble Ticket] --> C[Assigned To]

C[Assigned To] -- Updates --> B[Trouble Ticket]

B[Trouble Ticket] -- Resolves --> D[Resolved]

```

User Creation: The graph starts with the "User" node, indicating that a user initiates the process by creating a "Trouble Ticket." This suggests that users can submit their requests, issues, or problem reports through the ticketing system.

Trouble Ticket Creation: Once the user creates a trouble ticket, it is represented by the "Trouble Ticket" node (B). This node signifies the existence of the ticket within the system and serves as a reference point for tracking and managing the reported issue.

Assignment: The ticket system assigns the created trouble ticket to a specific entity or individual. This assignment is depicted by the arrow from the "Trouble Ticket" node (B) to the "Assigned To" node (C). It indicates that the ticket is designated or allocated to someone responsible for resolving the reported issue.

Ticket Updates: The "Assigned To" node (C) is connected to the "Trouble Ticket" node (B) with an arrow labeled "Updates." This indicates that the assigned individual or entity can provide updates on the ticket's progress, status, or any actions taken. It represents the ongoing communication and collaboration between the assignee and the ticket system.

Ticket Resolution: Finally, the "Trouble Ticket" node (B) is connected to the "Resolved" node (D) with an arrow labeled "Resolves." This connection signifies that when the assigned entity completes the resolution of the ticket, the ticket is marked as resolved within the system.

Trouble ticket flow mapped to work Resolves

```mermaid

graph LR

subgraph Trouble Ticket Mapping System

A[User] -- Creates --> B[Trouble Ticket]

B[Trouble Ticket] --> C[Assigned To]

C[Assigned To] -- Updates --> B[Trouble Ticket]

B[Trouble Ticket] -- Resolves --> D[Resolved]

end

??

subgraph Primary Work Role ID Mapping

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| B[Description]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| C[Email]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| D[Problem]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| E[Change]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| F[Request]

A[Primary Work Role ID] -->|has| G[Incident]

B[Description] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

C[Email] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

D[Problem] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

E[Change] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

F[Request] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

G[Incident] -- associated with --> A[Primary Work Role ID]

end

```

??

?Trouble Ticket Mapping System:

User Creation: The flow starts with the "User" node, indicating the involvement of users in creating trouble tickets.

Trouble Ticket Creation: The user creates a "Trouble Ticket" (B) to report an issue or problem.

Assignment: The created trouble ticket is assigned to a specific role or individual represented by the "Assigned To" (C) node.

Ticket Update: The assigned role or individual updates the trouble ticket with relevant information or progress.

Ticket Resolution: Once the issue is resolved, the trouble ticket is marked as "Resolved" (D).

Primary Work Role ID Mapping:

Primary Work Role ID: The "Primary Work Role ID" (A) represents a unique identifier for a specific work role.

Description, Email, Problem, Change, Request, Incident: The primary work role ID is associated with various attributes or entities such as "Description" (B), "Email" (C), "Problem" (D), "Change" (E), "Request" (F), and "Incident" (G).

Associations: Each attribute or entity is associated with the primary work role ID, indicating the relationship and dependency between them.

Interactions:

The Trouble Ticket Mapping System and the Primary Work Role ID Mapping processes interact in the following way:

The Trouble Ticket Mapping System relies on the Primary Work Role ID Mapping to associate trouble tickets with specific work roles. This allows for efficient ticket assignment and resolution based on the assigned role.

The Primary Work Role ID Mapping provides essential information and attributes associated with the primary work role ID, which can be utilized in the trouble ticket management process.

Teams and roles

??

```mermaid

graph TD

A[Securely Provision] -- Provides --> B[Analyze]

A[Securely Provision] -- Provides --> C[Collect and Operate]

A[Securely Provision] -- Provides --> D[Investigate]

A[Securely Provision] -- Provides --> E[Oversight and Development]

??

B[Analyze] -- Involves --> F[Operate and Maintain]

B[Analyze] -- Involves --> G[Investigate]

B[Analyze] -- Involves --> H[Protect and Defend]

??

C[Collect and Operate] -- Involves --> F[Operate and Maintain]

C[Collect and Operate] -- Involves --> I[Securely Provision]

??

D[Investigate] -- Involves --> G[Investigate]

D[Investigate] -- Involves --> H[Protect and Defend]

??

E[Oversight and Development] -- Involves --> I[Securely Provision]

E[Oversight and Development] -- Involves --> J[Analyze]

E[Oversight and Development] -- Involves --> K[Protect and Defend]

??

F[Operate and Maintain] -- Involves --> L[Analyze]

F[Operate and Maintain] -- Involves --> K[Protect and Defend]

??

G[Investigate] -- Involves --> L[Analyze]

G[Investigate] -- Involves --> M[Collect and Operate]

??

H[Protect and Defend] -- Involves --> K[Protect and Defend]

??

I[Securely Provision] -- Provides --> N[Operate and Maintain]

??

J[Analyze] -- Involves --> N[Operate and Maintain]

??

K[Protect and Defend] -- Involves --> N[Operate and Maintain]

??

L[Analyze] -- Involves --> M[Collect and Operate]

??

M[Collect and Operate] -- Involves --> N[Operate and Maintain]

```

?Securely Provision:

The "Securely Provision" (A) node provides various capabilities and resources to support different activities.

It provides the necessary components for the "Analyze" (B), "Collect and Operate" (C), "Investigate" (D), and "Oversight and Development" (E) processes.

Analyze:

The "Analyze" process (B) involves activities such as "Operate and Maintain" (F), "Investigate" (G), and "Protect and Defend" (H).

It relies on the "Operate and Maintain" process (F) and is involved in the "Protect and Defend" process (H).

It receives resources and capabilities from the "Securely Provision" (A) node.

Collect and Operate:

The "Collect and Operate" process (C) involves activities such as "Operate and Maintain" (F) and "Securely Provision" (I).

It relies on the "Operate and Maintain" process (F) and receives resources from the "Securely Provision" (A) node.

Investigate:

The "Investigate" process (D) involves activities such as "Investigate" (G) and "Protect and Defend" (H).

It relies on the "Investigate" process (G) and receives resources from the "Securely Provision" (A) node.

Oversight and Development:

The "Oversight and Development" process (E) involves activities such as "Securely Provision" (I), "Analyze" (J), and "Protect and Defend" (K).

It relies on the "Securely Provision" process (I) and is involved in the "Analyze" (J) and "Protect and Defend" (K) processes.

Operate and Maintain:

The "Operate and Maintain" process (F) involves activities such as "Analyze" (L) and "Protect and Defend" (K).

It receives resources from the "Securely Provision" (A) node and is involved in the "Analyze" (L) and "Protect and Defend" (K) processes.

Protect and Defend:

The "Protect and Defend" process (H) involves activities such as "Protect and Defend" (K).

It relies on the "Protect and Defend" process (K) and receives resources from the "Securely Provision" (A) node.

Securely Provision:

The "Securely Provision" process (I) provides resources for the "Operate and Maintain" process (N).

It receives resources from the "Oversight and Development" process (E) and is involved in the "Analyze" (N) and "Protect and Defend" (N) processes.

Analyze:

The "Analyze" process (J) is involved in the "Operate and Maintain" process (N).

It receives resources from the "Oversight and Development" process (E).

Protect and Defend:

The "Protect and Defend" process (K) is involved in the "Operate and Maintain" process (N).

It receives resources from the "Oversight and Development" process (E) and the "Investigate" process (G).

Analyze and Collect and Operate:

The "Analyze" process (L) is involved in the "Collect and Operate" process (M).

The "Investigate" process (G) is also involved in the "Collect and Operate" process (M).

Collect and Operate and Operate and Maintain:

The "Collect and Operate" process (M) is involved in the "Operate and Maintain" process (N).

Executive Summary:

The presented flowchart illustrates a comprehensive process framework for securely provisioning and operating a system. It outlines the interactions and dependencies between various activities involved in this process. The framework is designed to ensure the effective and secure management of the system throughout its lifecycle.

The process begins with the "Securely Provision" activity, which provides essential capabilities and resources for the subsequent processes. These processes include "Analyze," "Collect and Operate," "Investigate," and "Oversight and Development." Each process involves specific activities and relies on resources from the "Securely Provision" activity.

The "Analyze" process encompasses activities such as "Operate and Maintain," "Investigate," and "Protect and Defend." It plays a crucial role in understanding the system's state and identifying potential vulnerabilities. The "Collect and Operate" process involves activities such as "Operate and Maintain" and "Securely Provision" and focuses on collecting and managing system data.

The "Investigate" process involves activities related to investigation and response to security incidents. It relies on resources from the "Investigate" and "Securely Provision" processes. The "Oversight and Development" process contributes to overseeing the system's security and development, involving activities such as "Securely Provision," "Analyze," and "Protect and Defend."

The "Operate and Maintain" process ensures the ongoing operation and maintenance of the system. It involves activities related to analyzing and protecting the system. The "Protect and Defend" process focuses on safeguarding the system against potential threats and vulnerabilities.

Throughout the entire process, there are interdependencies and interactions between the different activities. These relationships ensure that resources are properly allocated and that the system is effectively protected and maintained.

By following this process framework, organizations can establish a robust and secure system provisioning and operation methodology. It promotes a proactive approach to identify and address potential risks, maintain the system's integrity, and respond swiftly to incidents. Implementing this framework enhances the organization's overall security posture and minimizes potential disruptions to the system's availability and confidentiality.

Overall, this process framework provides a structured and comprehensive approach to securely provisioning and operating systems, allowing organizations to effectively manage their information systems' security requirements.