The UN Represents The Governments Of The World. May A "Bell Of Atri" Represent The People Of The World? (Part 28)
"The Great Depression, like most other periods of severe unemployment, was produced by government mismanagement rather than by any inherent instability of the private economy." - Milton Friedman
Now that the People Of The World have understood that the world's Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs), e.g. the United Nations (UN), were designed to serve the Governments Of The World ONLY, another question arises:
What exactly does serving the Governments Of The World entail? Is this obligation automatically activated whenever a given Government Of The World announces the commencement of a project in which an IGO could assist? Or is the IGO under no obligation whatsoever, unless & until a given Government Of The World actually asks it to get involved? How is an IGO legally obligated to respond if faced by an allegation of negligence or corruption by a Government Of The World?
Given below, are 3 separate news reports regarding illegal activities, all of which are linked to the identity theft market, over the last fortnight...
"AT&T says leaked data set impacts about 73 million current, former account holders" - Reuters (March 31, 2024)
To summarize: AT&T has announced the leak of a customer data set on the "Dark Web" approximately a fortnight ago; according to AT&T, the data set appears to be from 2019 or earlier & has impacted approximately 7.6 million current account holders & 65.4 million former account holders. AT&T added that, while there had been no unauthorized access to its systems (that it is aware of), it has reset all current customers' passcodes & is in contact with all impacted parties. AT&T is uncertain as of right now, whether the data set was leaked from its own systems or that of an AT&T vendor.
"2.7 million Pakistani data compromised over five years" - Deccan Herald (March 27, 2024)
To summarize: The Pakistan Interior Ministry has disclosed that a data breach in the National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) database between 2019 & 2023, resulted in the theft & overseas sale of the personal details of approximately 2.7 million Pakistanis. The data was allegedly siphoned off from NADRA offices in Multan, Karachi & Peshawar; after which it was moved to Dubai & then sold on the stolen identity black market to other countries, e.g. Argentina & Romania.
领英推荐
"US reportedly investigating Meta for role in illicit drug sales" - Yahoo Finance (March 16, 2024)
To summarize: Virginia prosecutors & the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA), launched an investigation in 2023 to ascertain whether Meta Platforms Inc. (an American multinational technology conglomerate) profited from illegal narcotics sales on any/all of its social media platforms. This is the second investigation into Meta's business practices, the previous case (from New Mexico, also in 2023) being about whether Meta was aiding & abetting in the distribution of child pornography.
In view of the fact that each accused party in the aforementioned news stories - AT&T, NADRA, Meta - has apparently been targeted by identity thieves (possibly with links to transnational organized crime), why is there no word from the IGOs with access to relevant evidence, e.g. INTERPOL & FATF, regarding the assistance they could render to these investigations by e.g., publicly cross-referencing their data against the data gathered by the investigatory authorities? Isn't there a serious danger that, if allowed to progress until a given Government Of The World gathers sufficient evidence, a crime (past or ongoing) could encourage further criminality &/or harm?
For instance, had any informed IGO ended the "controversy" over Michael Jackson's innocence of the molestation charges that continue to emerge to this day (including from mature men who testified as adults that he was innocent, then changed their stances after he was murdered...but have yet to face a court on the charge of perjury); would the US judicial system - especially US law firms - today be viewed with so much distrust?
For example, had any informed IGO objected to the (illegal) handover of Michael Jackson's estate to the lawyer & law firm he fired (Ziffren Brittenham partner John Branca), 3 individuals he neither fathered nor adopted, or his mother (whom, along with his siblings, he had already showered with wealth he didn't owe them); would foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in the US have started falling in 2009, which - contrary to the assurances of the mainstream media - continues to this day?
Could an IGO be held responsible for withholding evidence (i.e. Failure to give required evidence or disclose essential information) or tampering with evidence (i.e. A knowing or deliberate alteration, concealment, falsification, or destruction of evidence)? Or do IGOs have legal immunity from investigation &/or prosecution by non-IGO authorities?
Conventional diplomats who represent a given Government Of The World are generally offered diplomatic immunity - but then, they can't demand & don't have unbridled access to their host nation's official records...unlike the leading IGOs of the world, e.g. UN, INTERPOL, FATF, etc.
Is this discrepancy by mistake or by design? If by mistake, how have the legal branches of the IGOs not raised the matter for resolution? If by design, why may the Governments Of The World equip the IGOs with the status of supervisor &/or overseer without obligating them to come forward whenever & wherever they have access to relevant evidence &/or information?
"A state is better governed which has few laws, & those laws strictly observed." - Rene Descartes