The Ultimate Legal Guide to Fight Back Against Social Media Hackers !
A silhouette of a girl holding a phone with a skull and crossbones on the screen and a chain around the neck - symbolising hacked victim

The Ultimate Legal Guide to Fight Back Against Social Media Hackers !

How to Protect Yourself from Social Media Hacking: A Legal Guide


Introduction

Social media hacking is a cybercrime that can damage your reputation, privacy, and dignity. It can also make you liable for any illegal or offensive content posted by the hacker. Recently ,This happened to Tigmanshu Dhulia, a filmmaker, whose Instagram account was hacked and misused and He was fumbling for help from Instagram or the police after the incident.

Many celebrities and public figures have faced similar issues. For example, Amitabh Bachchan’s Twitter account was hacked by a Turkish group. Nirmala Sitharaman’s Instagram account was hacked by an unknown person.

You need to know your legal rights and remedies in such situations. You can take action against the hacker and the social media platform under various laws. You can also use the grievance redressal mechanism provided by the government.

This article will tell you what legal options you have in case of social media hacking.



Legal Remedies under the IT Act

The IT Act is the main law that deals with cybercrimes. It provides civil and criminal remedies for hacking, identity theft, data theft, privacy violation, etc. You can use sections 43, 66, 66C, 66D, 66E, and 67 of the IT Act against the hacker or the social media platform. You can file a complaint with the Adjudicating Officer under section 46 of the IT Act for compensation. You can also file a complaint with the Cyber Crime Cell of the police for criminal action.

Some past case laws on hacking under the IT Act are:

  • Jagjeet Singh v. The State of Punjab [1]: The accused hacked into a woman’s email account and sent obscene emails. He was convicted under section 66 of the IT Act.
  • Kumar v. Whiteley [2]: The accused hacked into a company’s computer system and deleted some files. He was convicted under section 43 and section 66 of the IT Act.
  • Kamalakanta Tripathy v. State of Odisha and Ors. [3]: The accused hacked into a college’s website and changed its admission criteria. He was convicted under section 43 and section 66 of the IT Act.




Legal Remedies under the IPC

The IPC is another law that deals with cybercrimes. It provides criminal remedies for cheating, forgery, defamation, etc. You can use sections 463, 464, 468, 469, 499, and 500 of the IPC against the hacker or the social media platform. You can file a complaint with the competent court for criminal action.

Some past case laws on hacking under the IPC are:

State v. Mohd Afzal [4]: The accused hacked into the website of the Parliament of India and defaced it with anti-India messages. He was convicted under section 468 and section 469 of the IPC.

  • State v. Nazir Ahmed [5]: The accused hacked into a woman’s email account and sent obscene emails. He was convicted under section 499 and section 500 of the IPC.




Legal Remedies under the IT Rules

The IT Rules provide a grievance redressal mechanism for users or victims of social media platforms. The IT Rules divide social media intermediaries into two categories: social media intermediaries and significant social media intermediaries. The latter are platforms with more than 50 lakh registered users in India. They have to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal contact person, a resident grievance officer, and publish a monthly compliance report.

The IT Rules also mandate that every social media intermediary and publisher shall establish a grievance redressal mechanism and appoint a grievance officer to deal with complaints. You can use the grievance redressal mechanism to file a complaint with the grievance officer of the social media platform or any other authority as prescribed under the Rules. You can also approach the Inter-Departmental Committee constituted by the Central Government, which has the power to block, modify or delete any content that violates the Code of Ethics or any law in force.




Legal Remedies under the Law of Torts

The law of torts is another branch of law that can provide civil remedies for hacking. A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to another person or his or her property, rights, or interests. The remedy for a tort is damages or compensation.

You can use torts such as trespass to chattels, conversion, nuisance, defamation, and invasion of privacy against the hacker or the social media platform. You can file a suit in a civil court for damages or compensation.

Some past case laws on hacking under the law of torts are:

  • Intel Corporation v. Hamidi [6]: The plaintiff sued its former employee for hacking into its email system and sending unsolicited emails. The plaintiff claimed trespass to chattels by interfering with its computer system. The court dismissed the claim as there was no physical damage or impairment to the property.
  • eBay Inc v. Bidder’s Edge Inc [7]: The plaintiff sued another online company for hacking into its website and collecting data about its auctions. The plaintiff claimed trespass to chattels by using automated software or bots to access its website. The court granted a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiff as there was electronic interference that caused harm to the property.




Penalties for Non-Compliance

The penalties for non-compliance with the IT Act, the IPC, the IT Rules, or the law of torts depend on the nature and extent of the violation. However, one common consequence is that the social media intermediary or publisher will lose the protection from liability granted under section 79 of the IT Act. This means that they will be liable for any unlawful or objectionable content posted by third-party users on their platforms.

The IT Act, the IPC, and the IT Rules provide for various penalties and punishments for different offences, ranging from fine to imprisonment. The law of torts provides for damages or compensation for the harm caused by the tortfeasor.




Conclusion

Social media hacking is a serious cybercrime that can harm your reputation, privacy, and dignity. You can seek legal remedies under various laws against the hacker and the social media platform. You can also use the grievance redressal mechanism provided by the government.

  • This article has told you what legal options you have in case of social media hacking. It has been a legal ready reckoner for you. I hope you found it useful and informative. If you have any queries or feedback, please comment below. Thank you for reading!??




Bibliography

  • Information Technology Act, 2000
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860
  • Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
  • [1] Jagjeet Singh v. The State of Punjab, 2012 CriLJ 4168
  • [2] Kumar v. Whiteley, 2009 (1) ALT (Crl.) 1
  • [3] Kamalakanta Tripathy v. State of Odisha and Ors., 2015 SCC OnLine Ori 362
  • [4] State v. Mohd Afzal, 2003 CriLJ 1757
  • [5] State v. Nazir Ahmed, 2013 SCC OnLine Del 1109
  • [6] Intel Corporation v. Hamidi, 30 Cal.4th 1342 (2003)
  • [7] eBay Inc v. Bidder’s Edge Inc, 100 F.Supp.2d 1058 (2000)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了