The Ultimate Legal Guide to Fight Back Against Social Media Hackers !
Advocate Parikshit M Arya
Advocate Bombay High Court, Corporate & IPR Lawyer, Govt Licensed Patent Agent
How to Protect Yourself from Social Media Hacking: A Legal Guide
Introduction
Social media hacking is a cybercrime that can damage your reputation, privacy, and dignity. It can also make you liable for any illegal or offensive content posted by the hacker. Recently ,This happened to Tigmanshu Dhulia, a filmmaker, whose Instagram account was hacked and misused and He was fumbling for help from Instagram or the police after the incident.
Many celebrities and public figures have faced similar issues. For example, Amitabh Bachchan’s Twitter account was hacked by a Turkish group. Nirmala Sitharaman’s Instagram account was hacked by an unknown person.
You need to know your legal rights and remedies in such situations. You can take action against the hacker and the social media platform under various laws. You can also use the grievance redressal mechanism provided by the government.
This article will tell you what legal options you have in case of social media hacking.
Legal Remedies under the IT Act
The IT Act is the main law that deals with cybercrimes. It provides civil and criminal remedies for hacking, identity theft, data theft, privacy violation, etc. You can use sections 43, 66, 66C, 66D, 66E, and 67 of the IT Act against the hacker or the social media platform. You can file a complaint with the Adjudicating Officer under section 46 of the IT Act for compensation. You can also file a complaint with the Cyber Crime Cell of the police for criminal action.
Some past case laws on hacking under the IT Act are:
Legal Remedies under the IPC
The IPC is another law that deals with cybercrimes. It provides criminal remedies for cheating, forgery, defamation, etc. You can use sections 463, 464, 468, 469, 499, and 500 of the IPC against the hacker or the social media platform. You can file a complaint with the competent court for criminal action.
Some past case laws on hacking under the IPC are:
State v. Mohd Afzal [4]: The accused hacked into the website of the Parliament of India and defaced it with anti-India messages. He was convicted under section 468 and section 469 of the IPC.
Legal Remedies under the IT Rules
The IT Rules provide a grievance redressal mechanism for users or victims of social media platforms. The IT Rules divide social media intermediaries into two categories: social media intermediaries and significant social media intermediaries. The latter are platforms with more than 50 lakh registered users in India. They have to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal contact person, a resident grievance officer, and publish a monthly compliance report.
领英推荐
The IT Rules also mandate that every social media intermediary and publisher shall establish a grievance redressal mechanism and appoint a grievance officer to deal with complaints. You can use the grievance redressal mechanism to file a complaint with the grievance officer of the social media platform or any other authority as prescribed under the Rules. You can also approach the Inter-Departmental Committee constituted by the Central Government, which has the power to block, modify or delete any content that violates the Code of Ethics or any law in force.
Legal Remedies under the Law of Torts
The law of torts is another branch of law that can provide civil remedies for hacking. A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to another person or his or her property, rights, or interests. The remedy for a tort is damages or compensation.
You can use torts such as trespass to chattels, conversion, nuisance, defamation, and invasion of privacy against the hacker or the social media platform. You can file a suit in a civil court for damages or compensation.
Some past case laws on hacking under the law of torts are:
Penalties for Non-Compliance
The penalties for non-compliance with the IT Act, the IPC, the IT Rules, or the law of torts depend on the nature and extent of the violation. However, one common consequence is that the social media intermediary or publisher will lose the protection from liability granted under section 79 of the IT Act. This means that they will be liable for any unlawful or objectionable content posted by third-party users on their platforms.
The IT Act, the IPC, and the IT Rules provide for various penalties and punishments for different offences, ranging from fine to imprisonment. The law of torts provides for damages or compensation for the harm caused by the tortfeasor.
Conclusion
Social media hacking is a serious cybercrime that can harm your reputation, privacy, and dignity. You can seek legal remedies under various laws against the hacker and the social media platform. You can also use the grievance redressal mechanism provided by the government.
Bibliography