UK's Anti-Rave Bill and Its Lasting Implications

Debated and divisive, the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act is a subject of contention. While some argue it led to safer, regulated raves, others contend it stifled a vibrant cultural movement underground.

1994, the UK passed the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act , specifically targeting raves. This legislation aimed to crack down on events with "repetitive beats," giving police broad powers to shut them down if deemed appropriate.

Today, we will discuss this law's complex legacy. While some credit it with moving the rave scene into safer, regulated spaces, others argue it stifled a vibrant cultural movement.

In policy circles, we often discuss where the intersection between people’s likes, freedom of choice, and the law meets. More often than not, we find that less government involvement allows for more civil liberties to be enjoyed. Also, allowing laws to take their rightful place in civic discourse creates buffers and frameworks for that discourse to take place.??

“The Criminal Justice Act is one of the most important milestones in modern British history. It’s a real turning point in the way that British society is organized. The post-war consensus, the birth of the welfare state , and the strength of the unions up to the arrival of Thatcher were part of a society essentially built on communal principles. Fundamentally there's a sense of social cohesion and communal identity, whether that's class identity or identity through working in a particular industry and being represented by your union. You also have communal access to – and power over – space. Throughout history, this lineage of nomadic or countercultural use of space has always existed. British law and society have historically afforded space for those communal rituals, whether that's the bonfire night parade in Lewes or weird competitions chasing cheese down a hill. Some things haven’t required establishment approval or management because they emerged from a community identity with enough force to assert its collective will and needs.” -Jak Hutchcraft, Vice.

Luckily, for rave-goers, the Act targets other aspects of nightlight. The law includes punishing club owners who know that drugs such as ecstasy are on their premises.?

We can see this intersection emerging between allowing people to do bad things and attempting to preemptively stop them from doing a behavior that they may or may not do and that may or may not inevitably hurt themselves or others.??

One can further postulate that laws like the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act are positive steps toward protecting residents and business owners who aren’t participating in nightlife activities.?

However, laws that infringe on personal liberties tread a dangerous path, potentially paving the way for more restrictive future laws. It's crucial to scrutinize these laws and their implications to ensure our intentions are rooted in liberty, not temporary solutions.?

Challenges:

• The law's focus on the music genre raised concerns about unfair targeting and a lack of clear definitions regarding the style of music.?When targeting specific societal components, the singling out has more adverse effects on other subcategory areas.
• The criminalization of raves arguably drove them underground, potentially creating safety hazards. We have seen this happen in many areas when a policy has zeroed in and suppressed activity by “regulating it,” when human nature is not necessarily to stop the behavior but simply get better at finding ways to participate.

These are substantiated concerns that happen when the law steps into civil freedoms. After all, people haven’t stopped driving drunk, resorting to an attempt to conceal the activities.?

After a thorough exploration of the complex legacy of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, I am confident in the recommendations I am about to outline. These recommendations aim to relax the law for civil activities, striking a balance between personal freedoms and public safety.?

Policy Recommendations:

• Amend the law to include more explicit guidelines for event regulation, focusing on objective safety concerns rather than musical style, individual groups, or types of events.
• By focusing on harm reduction strategies and creating a safer environment for dance music events, we can envision a future where these events are not only safe but also celebrated for their cultural significance. This includes providing NARCAN , additional first responder infrastructure, and leveraging technology to monitor gaps and isolated incidences in large crowds.??

This anniversary is not just a moment of reflection, but also an opportunity for you, as policymakers, to shape the future. By learning from the past and adjusting for the present, you can create a framework that fosters a safe and thriving dance music scene, a testament to your understanding of the complex legacy of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act.?

Policymakers should always consider the implications of the laws they propose by remembering that the freedoms they enjoy are the same for others, sometimes expressed differently.

Click Here to Subscribe for Future Policy Brief Updates