Capturing landscape information for geometric applications has drastically evolved. Manual surveying once set the standards, paving the way for groundbreaking technologies like photogrammetry and LiDAR. Today, advancements in geospatial tech have transformed data capture: we’ve moved from large sensors on aeroplanes with multi-person teams to UAVs with smaller, efficient sensors operated by a single individual.
The current debate in the UAV space centers on which technology is better: photogrammetry or LiDAR. Each has its strengths and limitations, and the decision ultimately depends on the specific application of the data. Let’s break it down.
?? Photogrammetry Data Captured Using UAV-Mounted Cameras:
- How It Works: UAV-mounted cameras capture overlapping images with high forward and side overlap. These images are stitched together to form detailed orthomosaics and Digital Surface Models (DSMs).
- What It Captures: Each pixel is assigned an x, y, z coordinate, creating an accurate, photorealistic representation of the scene.
- 2D Applications: Great for orthomosaics, mapping, and urban planning.
- Built-Up Areas: Performs well in urban environments, capturing fine details like building facades and road networks.
- Struggles with dense vegetation, as it cannot penetrate tree canopies to capture ground details.
- Relies on good lighting conditions for accuracy.
- May falter in areas with uniform textures (e.g., deserts, water bodies).
?? LiDAR Data Captured Using UAV-Mounted Sensors:
- How It Works: LiDAR sensors emit laser pulses that bounce off surfaces to measure distances. This creates precise point clouds with elevation and volumetric data.
- What It Captures: LiDAR excels in capturing ground elevation data, even in areas with dense vegetation or rugged terrains where photogrammetry struggles.
- 3D Applications: High-accuracy digital elevation models (DEMs), volumetric calculations, and terrain analysis.
- Natural Landscapes: Penetrates tree canopies to map forest floors, measure tree heights, and analyse flood zones.
- Built-Up Areas: Ideal for construction sites, infrastructure monitoring, and urban topography where precise measurements are needed.
- Operates effectively in low light or overcast conditions, even at night.
- Captures highly accurate elevation and volumetric data.
- Vegetation Penetration: Can measure ground levels under thick forests or shrubs.
- Lacks color and texture information, making it less visually detailed than photogrammetry (though it can be combined with imagery for enhanced results).
- Requires specialised sensors and processing, making it more expensive.
- Choose photogrammetry for projects where highly detailed surfaces are required, such as urban mapping.
- Opt for LiDAR when precision and terrain analysis matters most, especially in forestry, geology, and large-scale surveys.
- For comprehensive results, consider combining both technologies. Photogrammetry provides colour and visual detail, while LiDAR offers unparalleled accuracy and depth.
Which tool fits your project needs? Chat with us!
