This Type of Conflict Will Take Your Team To The Next Level

This Type of Conflict Will Take Your Team To The Next Level

As the year kicks off, management teams around the world are holding their quarterly planning offsite meetings. These meetings are a great opportunity for leaders to step off the hamster wheel of their day-to-day, get aligned on the business’ long-term?strategy , and determine how to serve that strategy in their focus areas. These offsites also offer great opportunities for productive conflict.

Strong partnerships, both personal and professional, are defined by mutual respect and consistent harmony. However, even the most harmonious teams cannot, and should not, always be in agreement. And while it can be hard in the moment, the same is true for couples, families and friends.

All groups experience conflict. But what separates high-performing groups from the pack has everything to do with what organizational psychologist and author?Adam Grant ?calls task conflict and relationship conflict.

As Grant notes in his 2021 book,?Think Again , task conflict occurs when a group of people disagree over ideas or opinions—everyone is united against one problem, even if they disagree on the solution. In contrast, relationship conflict occurs when these types of disagreements are filled with personal animosity, flared tempers, and even insults. While the latter type of conflict can tear teams apart, the former is an essential part of effective teams and partnerships.

The reality is that even if two or more people agree on a problem or a priority that needs addressing, they may have very different ideas about the solution. When people debate those ideas—and avoid attacking each other personally—that is productive task conflict, and an important way to get all the ideas on the table and reach the best outcome.

However, if you take a dismissive attitude toward other people and their viewpoints, you’ll actually?suppress the best ideas ; your contempt for other people will show, and you won’t be open to hearing anyone else’s perspective because there’s no foundation of trust or respect. You will be arguing with them as a person, rather than arguing with the merits of their ideas.

The best teams know how to keep productive task conflict from dissolving into relationship conflict. When things get heated, and people entrench in their positions, it’s crucial to separate the idea from the person and engage with that viewpoint directly, rather than attacking the person who disagrees with you. Even for teams that start out with trust and respect, this can be a hard thing to do.

A key strategy for keeping arguments in the task conflict space, rather than falling into relationship conflict, is to do what Patrick Lencioni calls “disagree and commit,” as shared in his bestselling book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Lencioni recommends that once all viewpoints on an issue are voiced, the team should make a decision, either via a vote or the leader’s choice, and everyone must agree to execute on that decision.

Effective teams trust each other enough to move forward with a course of action, even if some members disagree with it personally. The hallmark of a great relationship is to move from conflict to a proposed solution without any lingering animosity, and full support of the plan.

The next time you come into conflict with another person or group, ask yourself, am I debating the merits of an idea, or am I debating the merits of this person? Understanding the difference between the two, and focusing on the idea, is often the difference between exiting a conflict amicably and productively, or walking away with lingering animosity and no clear solution.

Quote of the Week:?“The absence of conflict is not harmony, it’s apathy. If you’re in a group where people never disagree, the only way that could really happen is if people don’t care enough to speak their minds.” - Adam Grant

The above article is a?Friday Forward ,?my short weekly leadership note?read by 200,000+ leaders in over sixty countries each Friday morning.

You may also enjoy?The Elevate Podcast , where I interview business leaders and entrepreneurs, bestselling authors, and world-renowned thinkers.?

Robert Glazer?is the Founder and Chairman of the Board at?Acceleration Partners,?an award-winning partner marketing agency with over twenty-five best place to work awards. He is also a #1 Wall Street Journal bestselling author and keynote speaker. Full bio and speaking inquires at?www.robertglazer.com

Interesting! I like

回复
Christine Wade

Driving Service-Based Business Growth via "Heartful" Automations & Systems. Operations Expert | Fractional COO | 1:1 & Group Consulting | Best Selling Author ??

2 年

Keeping the conflict about the issues and not the relationship is so difficult…and certainly not very easy to do in the heat of the moment. Keeping tabs on your own emotions and what the best possible outcome would be and head for that…this is usually what I TRY to do. Great article.

Angela Stauder

Career Clarity and Confidence Catalyst | Sustainable Success Coach

2 年

I agree with everything above and the great comments. What I wonder about the role of two other factors: psychological safety/trust and the confidence of each person/everyone on a team to lean into conversations to debate ideas. There is no such thing as a 'surgical disagreement'; conversations only happen in the container of relationship, and we can't divorce ourselves from that. Since most of us don't learn 'effective disagreement' skills, even if everyone is trying their best, there are so many other factors at play. The only thing I can think of that works fairly well is having an explicit, simple discussion process that is facilitated by person who can hold the space for process and the people. Without turn by turn directions and a guide to help people learn to navigate and travel into and through the unmarked territory of different perspectives, is it any wonder that many teams shy away from candid conversations? Apathy is a factor for some, no doubt. But I wonder if another challenge is that most people avoid moving into uncomfortable conversations because they have never experienced a successful 'task conflict' discussion.

Thomas Hastings

Innovation is the domain of those under 40, Wisdom is the domain of those over 50

2 年

No big surprise here, we are first and foremost a social creature.

Jon Mejia

Strategic Thinker | Collaborative Problem Solver | Innovative Execution

2 年

This is a great read! Conflict is hard - there is emotions, baggage, preferences, and a variety of other factors feeding fear, but some of the best outcomes have been when all parties push past the noise and align on the problem, obstacle, or challenge is overcome. Don’t avoid conflict, embrace it!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Robert Glazer的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了