TWO BRICKS

TWO BRICKS

RE-THINKING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

I recently attended an event, and then read a number of articles, following the demise of Carillion Construction. The speakers at the event included people who were passionate about change in the construction industry. They were vociferous in the belief that something must be done to deliver projects better, without dispute, and that there must be new ways of doing things.

The one thing that was missing from this very positive approach, was an actual idea about what should be done. Apart from that teensy issue, the scene was set for change.

Preferring to be proactive, I started thinking about what the core issues actually are. What exactly needs fixing?

Major construction enterprises seem to work on low single figure margins, while delivering great feats of engineering, at great risk, and in the middle of a serious skills shortage. Hard to fathom that one. With tight margins, there is nowhere to go on a problem job, when costs start to mount. Accepting that there are many problems, one often cited is that the whole endeavour costs too much and the costs always rise, seemingly out of control. Over the years, ideas have come along to save money and do so by making the industry more efficient. I remember going to partnering seminars back in the noughties and being promised savings of between 20% and 25%. I have also attended BIM conferences, where savings of 15% to 25% have been set out as the key drivers to integrate new working methods. By now, projects should therefore be costing between 35% and 50% less than before. As a quantum expert, reporting on pricing of projects on a regular basis, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but these savings are not yet on my radar. Moreover, costs are rising year on year, as one would expect.

So, what cunning plan can be deployed to create great savings in construction and engineering?

Sometimes it’s important to go back to basics. Start with a very simple project. Let’s start with two bricks. Ok, so not an ambitious project, but potential for a barbeque at least. In order to lay two bricks, I need:

    i.         The bricks

     ii.         Some mortar

    iii.         A bricklayer

I accept that you can save money on anything. I however suggest that once you have specified a brick of good quality and a small amount of mortar, there is very limited scope to save any more. The bricklayer can be local, or imported at lower rates, but a skilled man in any environment will have a minimum price he can work for. The price, is effectively the price. Partnering is not going to save 20% here, nor will a collaborative form of contract or the use of BIM.

I use this simple example to suggest that the materials and labour required are not going to be the opportunity for great savings, without compromising quality, in almost any project. If a competent buying process takes place, these costs have a minimum value.

That bricklayer will have people behind him. There will be:

      i.         An estimating department

     ii.         A buying department

    iii.         A Manager

    iv.         Accountants

     v.         Support staff

    vi.         An HR department

  vii.         A sales or BD department

 viii.         Some marketing staff

    ix.         A quality assurance team

     x.         An insurance manager

    xi.         Some designers or checkers

  xii.         Some directors, a CEO, and many others

My latest favourite addition to this list being a GDPR compliance manager. Don’t try laying any bricks without one. I apologise to the many support functions I have not mentioned. The 40 or so people now involved in this company that will, in some way, help the guy laying the bricks, all do a good job and have a clear function.

My point is, it is these support and management functions that have grown over the years, and these are the areas in which the savings could be found. In other words, the only way to really save is to take out extra layers that you have already put in. Get back to two bricks. Can these support functions be executed in such a way as to reduce costs by increasing efficiency? Can this be done while still delivering quality in a safe manner, without increasing the risk of defects or disputes?

Reviewing large construction companies’ costs, is a complex process that specialist management consultants often undertake. They don’t lay any bricks either.

In the UK we have some great innovators. Not just in construction, but in technology-based industries. In the aerospace and automotive industries, their products are developed by evolution of a period. Each version slightly improved on the last, the latest iteration seemingly light years ahead of the first but achieved by a series of small steps. I have already written about Kaizen for Consultants in another article, and that’s the approach. However, in those industries, technology (and often updated regulation) dictates that every few years a completely new approach is needed from scratch. A clean sheet of paper. There is also a constant push for better performance, without waiting for a catalyst for change. I have just finished reading the autobiography of Adrian Newey [1], a well-known innovator in his field, and the last few sentences of the book sum up his consistent approach of the last 35 years “…How can we increase performance? How can we improve efficiency? How can we do this differently?      How can I do this better?...”

Conclusions

Perhaps the time has come to take a new approach. Instead of studying the existing processes to see what can be modified, altered or adjusted, instead of searching for new software or clever gadgets, the answer might be to take a different approach.

To start with a clean sheet of paper.

Perhaps go back to two bricks, and re-imagine how we go about building from the basics?

Please add your thoughts below as a comment…

Note:

I note that the Chartered Institute of Civil Engineering Surveyors has recently started a competition, looking for commercial innovation. This is a great initiative from a forward-thinking institute, which I am sure will create some excellent ideas. For more information please follow this link:

https://www.cices.org/content/uploads/2018/03/ICES-Publishing-Award-New-Professional-CM.pdf

[1] Adrian Newey – How to build a car – Harper 7 Collins - 2 November 2017 - ISBN-13: 978-0008196806



Darrell Smart

Operations Director at Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors (CICES)

6 年

A great article Mark. Thank you for drawing attention to the ICES Publishing Award for New Professionals. The award is designed to encourage a new professional not only to raise their profile within their own organisation but within industry as a whole with revolutionary ideas. I'm sure some real innovation will come from it leading us into a new age for the industry. We need visionaries and we need them now.

回复
Rob Horne

Head of Construction and Engineering Disputes & Risk

6 年

Mark, amazing! You must have been listening in to my talk for the ICES with some sort of ESP as I made almost exactly the same point. We are beyond the point of wanting or needing incremental evolutionary change and we need to be looking at significant revolutionary change and what that means to our industry. I know you said there is not much of a cost saving to be made in man and materials for your very small BBQ but I would challenge that - you can't start with a blank piece of paper that is already partly filled in because...that's not a blank sheet of paper anymore! What about off-site manufacture or robotics either applicable to small BBQs or major projects. How can we do it better? Well first drop ALL preconceptions then look at outcome led process. Do we need any of that back office support at all, let alone multiple layers of it? The trouble with delaing with the layering is that project by project it can be very small numbers so the value of the saving is often very small, when compared to the labour-plant-material cost. The trouble is they add up across a business and across an industry and that is the only way to make them matter and put them in context.

Ian Cowling

Civil Engineering Commercial Consultant

6 年

A challenge for the young people now entering our profession. Can they think of a better way without being held back by past experiences. Be bold and be daring, it could work this time! Chartered ICES has established a 2040 Forum for young people to get involved in shaping their future. Can they consider how to fill that blank sheet if paper? Now there is a challenge and a huge opportunity. Well done Mark for pointing out the obvious that we tend to ignore.

Sean Gibbs

Chief Executive Officer at Hanscomb Intercontinental

6 年

Thanks for sharing Mark, those working as subcontractors and contractors are often told by government that cost reductions are needed but minimal margins already don’t help fund innovation or encourage it, companies are fighting to stay afloat.

Phil Moss

Senior Commercial Director at Arcadis UK

6 年

Very interesting article Mark. I agree we need to change but I'm not sure I agree with the formula one analogy especially Mr Newey who whilst definitely at the top of his game is not exactly at the forefront of cost saving. Saving money does not seem to have been the top priority in F1 for some time. I definitely agree that we need to change the process but I feel the cost savings will come from both embedding a quality and safety culture at trade level so we don’t need the checkers and by improving the design and procurement process. We still work in an industry where all to often lowest price is the defining factor and then we are surprised when we get disputes and delays. The Carillion saga has just demonstrated that the doers suffer and the managers walk away with fat bonuses and dividends.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Wheeler的更多文章

  • Is construction better or greener these days?

    Is construction better or greener these days?

    Sharing some recent insights from running my own project, with the opportunity to win a prize… Over the last few years,…

    2 条评论
  • How to interview badly and still get the job...

    How to interview badly and still get the job...

    I received a great deal of feedback from my recent article “How not to get a job or sell anything” CLICK HERE, and one…

    10 条评论
  • How not to get a job, or make a sale...

    How not to get a job, or make a sale...

    How not to get a job, or a sale…. Social media, and the internet overall, means that a great deal of information is out…

    3 条评论
  • 50/50 or phone a friend?

    50/50 or phone a friend?

    When you take on an appointment as an expert, you are supposed to know something about the subject matter you are…

  • Mind the Gap - What Gap? Oh, that Gap!

    Mind the Gap - What Gap? Oh, that Gap!

    During the summer I delivered a talk to the Chartered Institute of Civil Engineering Surveyors’ (Chartered ICES)…

    1 条评论
  • Part 2 NEC4 – Two blokes still in a bar…

    Part 2 NEC4 – Two blokes still in a bar…

    This week we return to the Engineers’ Arms, where Pete the Project Manager is having another drink with Dudley, the…

    11 条评论
  • NEC4 – Two blokes walk into a bar…

    NEC4 – Two blokes walk into a bar…

    PART ONE The Engineers’ Arms is a regular place for construction and engineering people to meet and enjoy the odd…

    2 条评论
  • Kaizen for consultants

    Kaizen for consultants

    I was recently asked to speak to a group of senior directors within a client organisation, not about a technical…

  • NEC4 – What do you want?

    NEC4 – What do you want?

    Early August is a time for holidays for many people. Here at Driver Trett however, our minds turn to the Autumn seminar…

    9 条评论
  • The Ballad of Bob Windows

    The Ballad of Bob Windows

    Having a contract is important..

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了