Twist the tropes. Please.
Image by Dariusz Sankowski from Pixabay.

Twist the tropes. Please.

I read a book over the weekend. (You're probably getting tired of my posts beginnig with "I read a book.")

Being an aficionado of the romance genre, I'm familiar with the tropes, all the tropes. This hero in this story was wealthy (of course) and the heroine was not (of course). It's Cinderella all over again!

In addition, the hero is emotionally unavailable, a powerhouse in the board room, unbearably handsome, and an all-around alpha male. Of course. He's also a single father of three and at his wit's end managing both the children and the business. That's uncommon—not the single daddy trope, but the "at his wit's end" part. The heroine is gorgeous, intelligent, generous, loving, thoughtful, and all those wonderful, stereotypically feminine traits. Of course. She's emotionally and physically damaged, too. That's pretty much standard in romantic heroines these days. In this book she's tall, six feet tall, which is uncommon. We can't have a heroine taller than her perfect romantic partner, so the hero's taller at six feet and five inches. with proportionately oversized appendages. Of course.

Then the story veered off the well-trodden path. In their interactions and repartee, the heroine gave as good as she got, sometimes better. Hurrah for femininism! The hero actually indulged in some introspection. What a sensitive guy! My jaw dropped as I read the hero's patience his willingness to accommodate the heroine's issues, his kindness and compassion. In short, the hero wasn't a jerk and the heroine wasn't a doormat despite their socioeconomic inequality.

The humor running throughout the story leavened the drama and angst. I actually chuckled aloud while reading it. That doesn't happen often.

Despite the occasional grammatical bobble (no, "then" and "than" are not the same), a few missed words that a good proofreader should have caught and fixed, and some weird formatting glitches, this book deserves a 5-star review.

Five-star reviews don't indicate perfection. (If you've read my blog before, then you know what I think about perfection.) I assign such high reviews to books that impress me for one reason or another. Merely good books that I enjoy but which don't really inspire that "wow" reaction get 4-star reviews. Any book littered with copy errors automatically loses a star, acknowledging the author's failure to deliver the quality the reader public expects and deserves. Poor writing degrades the rating further.

The gist this week is to reassure new/amateur writers that happy readers don't need complete originality. Truthfully, there are no new story arcs. They've all been done before, thousands upon thousands of time. What confers originality upon those well-worn archetypes is how the author treats them. What little twists and suprises will delight the reader? What will catch the reader's attention? What will hold the reader's interest?

As noted in this article, often the story that engages my attention and holds it and impresses me combines several elements in unexpected and wonderful ways. They take me out of the same-old-same-old rut. As a reader, I can't ask for more than that.

Every word counts.

#henhousepublishing #qualitymatters #writingtips #storytelling

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Karen M. Smith的更多文章

  • That dreaded writing assignment

    That dreaded writing assignment

    It's a cliche these days, but every child returning to school for the new academic year dreaded the inevitable "what I…

    2 条评论
  • Hard-earned experience beats academics

    Hard-earned experience beats academics

    Books are useful—necessary for learning—but you can't acquire expertise from one. In a Facebook group for equestrians…

  • So, you want to write a book? Do you know what you're getting into?

    So, you want to write a book? Do you know what you're getting into?

    Lots of folks want to have written a book, but few actually want to write one. Why? Because it's work.

  • The process of self-publishing

    The process of self-publishing

    There's a process to self-publishing that consistently yields best results. The process itself may be boiled down to…

    4 条评论
  • The 2024 Frankfort Sunflower Festival

    The 2024 Frankfort Sunflower Festival

    Frankfort, Ohio is a charming village (population just over 1,000) in Ross County, Ohio. And, like many villages and…

    1 条评论
  • A difference in audience

    A difference in audience

    I spent Sunday at Books & Brew or Books & Beer—the two names used interchangeably by the hosting venue—at Missing Falls…

  • Um ... no. Just no.

    Um ... no. Just no.

    When I aim my cursor over the box to compose a post or article, LinkedIn prompts with the the opportunity to have AI…

  • Don't Waste YourTime or Mine

    Don't Waste YourTime or Mine

    Especially on Facebook, I often see people seeking to hire writers and editors post terrible solicitations for their…

    2 条评论
  • Back to the grindstone

    Back to the grindstone

    Mondays may be rough, even for freelancers who enjoy the flexibility of self-employment. I don't have to be at my desk…

  • Abnormal, not Unnatural: Brevity

    Abnormal, not Unnatural: Brevity

    "As I edit my manuscript, I find myself adding words, not cutting them. Is that normal?" I came across that question…

社区洞察