Tuvalu Is Drowning And Global Warming Is To Blame. Not.
We constantly hear how small island nations like the Marshall Islands, Vanuatu and Tuvalu will drown as sea levels rise.
Yet, this is mostly wrong.
Absolutely, there is global warming, and sea levels are rising. As I've argued many other places, we should fix that: not with expensive, wishful thinking as we're doing now, but with massive investments in green R&D.
But nobody is helped by false claims of drowning islands.
Paul Kench, a geomorphologist who now heads the University of Auckland’s School of Environment in New Zealand, was the first to question these claims. Here is the story from Science a couple of years back:
Kench, who had been studying how atoll islands evolve over time, says he had assumed that a rising ocean would engulf the islands, which consist of sand perched on reefs. “That’s what everyone thought, and nobody questioned it,” he says. But when he scoured the literature, he could not find a single study to support that scenario.
What his studies showed instead was: "instead of eroding land, the waves would raise island elevation by depositing sand produced from broken coral, coralline algae, mollusks, and foraminifera. Kench notes that reefs can grow 10 to 15 millimeters a year—faster than the sea-level rise expected to occur later this century. “ As long as the reef is healthy and generates an abundant supply of sand, there’s no reason a reef island can’t grow and keep up,” he argues.
Remember, for example, that the Marshall Islands emerged on a reef 4800 to 4000 years ago, when sea levels were rising as fast as they are expected to rise over the next century.
Since then, Kench and colleagues have shown that most of the island nations have actually seen *increases* in their area, despite dramatic sea level rise.
And now, they show for Tuvalu, one of the global warming icons, that over the past 40 years there has been a net *increase* in land area in Tuvalu of 73.5 ha (2.9%), despite sea-level rise, and the land area has increased in eight of nine atolls.
Here is the Science article.
Here are some of his relevant articles:
- The dynamic response of reef islands to sea-level rise: Evidence from multi-decadal analysis of island change in the Central Pacific ("86% of islands remained stable (43%) or increased in area (43%) over the timeframe of analysis")
- Evidence for coral island formation during rising sea level in the central Pacific Ocean
- New model of reef-island evolution: Maldives, Indian Ocean (The Maldives "initially formed on a foundation of lagoonal sediments between 5500 and 4500 yr B.P. when the reef surface was as much as 2.5 m below modern sea level. Islands accumulated rapidly during the following 1500 yr, effectively reaching their current di- mensions by 4000 yr B.P.")
- Patterns of island change and persistence offer alternate adaptation pathways for atoll nations (the new Nature study on Tuvalu)
David Lee Hoss
6 年I'm not being political, but meteor/geo/logical. Rising seas do not equal sinking islands. My question to GW/CC scientists: Have you studied climate change enough that you would put your scientific credentials on the line that most of what is said in Al Gore's, "An Inconvenient Truth," (pushing global warming) is based on accurate scientific results? My guess is that many of the climate scientists would answer NO. Man caused 1 degree of climate change in the past 150 years. Large cities do the most due to roads, concrete, etc... But, catastrophic? No. Islands survive and die due to sediment change not climate change. There have not been any rise in hurricanes or storm activity recently. If someone tells you there has, they don't know or are lying. I thought Al Gore said, "My kids won't be able to build a snowman by the year 2000" when he was VP. Rachel Morris is an activist, not a scientist.
Owner at Rental Warehouse I Warehouse Consultant I Call: +919920887543
6 年Hii
Data Scientist at Roche
6 年I think this part is key: "As long as the reef is healthy and generates an abundant supply of sand, there’s no reason a reef island can’t grow and keep up,” The Great Coral Reef along Australia's coast is a (sad) prime example of why there's still cause for concern regarding the atoll nations. All evidence so far points to sea level warming (part of global warming) as the main cause behind the ecological collapse of the reefs. The fact described by the OP is good news, of course, but a "good news spot" in an otherwise depressing picture. [Of course, any response to this to the likes of "see? global warming is a hoax!" is preposterous and childish]