TUPE - Potentially Important Decision
Possible changes to TUPE - let'ds see if this is appealed

TUPE - Potentially Important Decision

Does TUPE apply to limb 'b' workers, as well as traditional employees?


Yes, according to the decision of an employment tribunal sitting in London in Dewhurst v Revisecatch & City Sprint.


We never normally send out employment tribunal decisions, as they're not binding. But this one is a stonker. Employment Judge Joffe has held, in a detailed and comprehensily reasoned judgment, that TUPE applies to 'workers' as well as traditional 'employees'.


Her reasoning, massively simplified down, is that the Acquired Rights Directive requires TUPE to be interpreted liberally, and the definition of 'employee' in TUPE is "an individual who works for another person whether under a contract of service or apprenticeship or otherwise..." The words 'or otherwise' must be taken to add something to the normal definition of 'employee', and hence covers limb 'b' workers.


The decision was handed down yesterday. As an employment tribunal decision, it is not binding. The employers have 42 days to appeal. I suspect an appeal is likely. If the appellate courts agree, it means workers (as well as employees) transfer under TUPE. Wow.


(c) Daniel Barnett


If you need HR / contract advice & support, please contact us at info@riverviewportfolio.co.uk

Mark Barrett

★ Business & Tax Strategist ★ Expat Tax Advisor ★ IR35 Tax Advisor ★ Property Tax Specialist ★ Proactive Accountant ★

5 å¹´

So this tribunal decision says that contractors working regularly with a company ( so have protected status of "worker") are also covered by TUPE

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Barrett的更多文章

  • Should directors have employment contracts?

    Should directors have employment contracts?

    Just seen another firm of accountants recommending that all directors have employment contracts – that is so contrary…

    6 条评论
  • SDLT Refunds and the Property market

    SDLT Refunds and the Property market

    With property clients seeing so many adverts for SDLT refunds, it’s a question that’s often asked about the veracity of…

  • Tax issues for online influencers

    Tax issues for online influencers

    Tax issues for online influencers As #HMRC targets online #influencers using social media as a platform to promote…

  • Don't quack like a duck, soar like an eagle

    Don't quack like a duck, soar like an eagle

    Are you a duck or an eagle Longish story, but I hope you'll see that it's worth reading Harvey was waiting in line for…

  • Strategy planning in a time of chaos

    Strategy planning in a time of chaos

    Excellent article from (c) McKinsey & Company that exemplifies the logical process we follow when we're helping our…

  • The 31st January tax deadline in figures....

    The 31st January tax deadline in figures....

    958,296 taxpayers miss self assessment deadline (up on last year's 700,000 late returns) 700,000 filed their returns on…

  • Interesting question from an old friend, Santa Claus.... VAT, naughty or nice

    Interesting question from an old friend, Santa Claus.... VAT, naughty or nice

    As he currently only works one day a year, he has decided to start up a new business venture in the UK to fill his…

  • HMRC confirms Christmas PAYE reporting dates

    HMRC confirms Christmas PAYE reporting dates

    HMRC is making permanent changes to the way Christmas payroll is reported to help universal credit claimants where…

  • Is now the time to sell a property that was your home?

    Is now the time to sell a property that was your home?

    For disposals on or after 6 April 2020, the tax changes are … - The “Wrap Around Relief” which is the additional period…

    1 条评论
  • The terrible consequences of not filing your accounts

    The terrible consequences of not filing your accounts

    We know that for many property entrepreneurs, the accounting process is something that might not be that important, but…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了