The Truth About Scheduling
Which is it? Surely, every CMMS user knows the difference.
Most asset-intensive organizations recognize that?strong planning and scheduling?is a prerequisite to operational excellence. And if properly implemented this advanced process can improve work force productivity, optimize backlog reduction, promote safety and enhance reliability.?There are many articles on the intricacies of maintenance planning but it is the?creation of the weekly maintenance schedule where challenges exist. There is no question that work order planning is a special talent which requires a comprehensive knowledge in the trades, job safety and backlog management. But it is equally hard to establish a system that provides automated scheduling such that?any size organization?can easily and quickly generate this output.
You Don't Know What You Don't Know
The CMMS vendors often have one or more business partners that create scheduling software as an add-on which interfaces with their product. Based on the designs of these add-ons (as of 2021), there are challenges and limitations the user community is not being told. The sales engineer who demonstrates the product follows a script which probably doesn’t resemble your process. The software vendor would not be familiar with your staffing levels or output requirements. Further, you may not even have a maintenance scheduler role in place. Sometimes a purchase is made by department heads without input from the real users of the product. In some instances they may confuse maintenance scheduling versus outage scheduling. This is not something you buy and then figure out later how to make it fit. The best approach is to first conduct a needs assessment which documents the type of schedule you need and the roles to operate it – and then purchase the software.
Weekly maintenance scheduling is an advanced process. That said, many struggle to perform this best practice. The complexity is due to the many prerequisites, e.g., process, software, data accuracy, staffing and knowledge
Just to be clear as to the challenge here: 95% of the CMMS community has never successfully created an automated, resource-leveled weekly maintenance schedule. The reasons are numerous, but most revolve around bad data - which forces subjective selection.
领英推荐
Different Types of Bad Data, Bad Process, and Bad Roles
When bad data exists, then the CMMS is relegated to basic processes with minimal return on investment.
Every size organization, regardless of industry, should be able to create a resource-leveled, weekly maintenance schedule, with one click, from within the CMMS.
The Odds are Not Good - But What if You Could?
If I talked to 100 people, 99 would say this is not possible. Some would question that this process could ever be automated, i.e., the history of the maintenance industry is just not good enough. Others would say, "The CMMS data integrity will never be accurate enough". Lastly, some would quietly state that their leadership team really doesn't want a weekly schedule because it would tie them down too much.
Reliability Engineer at Fonterra
3 年John Reeve Thanks for posting. ??
Asset Management, Maintenance and Reliability Engineering Specialist
3 年This is a very important discussion. Thanks for sharing. I guess this sequence would be a good approach: At first, value-adding criteria for assets portfolio; Second, right assets data; And then, realistic skill-based mapping plus true-craft capacity. If we would use the Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" applied for CMMS system, maybe it could be: [1] A CMMS may not drain value or, through inaction, allow a Company to come to an unacceptable risk. [2] A CMMS must obey orders given it by value-adding criteria except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. [3] A CMMS must protect the assets lifecycle as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Maintenance engineering. Modern CMMSs. Solutions to chronic downtime issues. Asset and maintenance management advisor/consultant
3 年I would love to contribute but you link does not work for me.
Principal Consultant, President, Director and Author
3 年This is an excellent article on a topic that is often talked about but seldom acted upon. I've long said to clients that the single most indicative indicator of achieving their goals in reliability is maintenance schedule success. You can't get that that without a number of stars aligning correctly. Planning, scheduling, and all the details that John speaks to are a part of that firmament. RCM and other reliability methods won't get you there on their own. They need a solid foundation. The "Uptime Pyramid of Excellence" (in my book) covers this topic as an "Essential". You just gotta have it right. Well done John. Let's keep the discussion going.
Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor at Nghi Son Refinery & Petrochemical LLC
3 年Thanks for this topic. Could you send me to [email protected]