The truth about physical store closures in retail
Brian Walker
FACD, FAIM , Chairman & Founder @ Retail Doctor Group Retail Experts / | Insights / Strategy Advisory,Operations - Transforming retail, We build market leading double digit growth retail channels.
We sit so high on the city walls
?Our tears wash clean the cobblestones
It’s not so much that the thrill is gone
Just a cleaner, sweeter, brighter thrill has come along
– Bernard Fanning
To read the retail headlines, on occasion, in ours and in other countries, is to read the story of a retail Armageddon – the complete destruction and abject capitulation of physical retail to this omnipotent herculean labelled as online retail and digital transformation.
How real is this perception? It certainly has a powerful sentiment although what do the facts currently tell us? Let’s examine the facts available for markets such as the US and UK, which are remarkably absent in our home country of Australia.
In the US, major retailers closed 5524 shops and opened 3083 shops in 2018. By sector, apparel retail shops led the pack with 766 closures. Payless Shoe Source contributed 408 of these closures, while Toys ‘R’ Us closed the most shops of any retailer in the US in 2018.
In the UK, major retailers closed 1432 stores and opened 755 in 2018. General merchandise retailers closed the most shops in the UK, with Poundworld closing more stores than any other.
So we see that in 2018, broadly speaking, two shops closed for every one that opened in the US and UK. To put this in perspective, we’re talking about 5524 retail shops out of 3.8 million physical retail shops in the US.
We also see this trend flattening out when we look at 2017, when there were 8139 closures in the US. In some analyses that include hospitality and service retail, store numbers actually opened in greater numbers than they closed in 2018.
And by the way, total sales from the nearly 3.8 million retail establishments in the US reached about US$2.7 trillion in 2018. Retailers employed almost 29 million people and supported more than 42 million jobs in the US.
Let’s take a closer look at the retail store closures in the US last year.
Of the 5524 store closures in 2018:
- Toys ‘R’ Us was the biggest contributor to store closures, shutting 735 shops
- Mattress Firm closed 600 shops
- Walgreens Boots Alliance closed 458 shops
- National Stores (owner of a discount chain selling apparel, accessories, shoe and home furnishings) closed 258 shops
- Bon Ton led closures in the department store sector, with 256 closures
- K-Mart contributed to the closure number for mass merchandisers
So, just six channels were responsible for close to 45 per cent of total store closures. (All data is from Core Insights.)
In Australian retail, we appear to be in a similar pattern, with evidence that flattening of the store closure trend is occurring. Now the pessimist might say that if this trend generally continues , it bodes poorly for physical shops. My response to that is to see that the devil is in the detail.
Essentially, mid-market to lower-value retail (notably mid-market apparel) is bearing the brunt of the physical store closures globally. The other factor is not online per se, but rather simply the growth of competition from other physical retailers. Shops have been opening and closing since the first market day in Bethlehem, often as a consequence of sharper, ‘fitter’ competition.
Further, this in the context of Australia sitting third in the overall global retail space per capita, so we can see an adjustment in the numbers within an over shopped economy. (The US is first, Canada is second and, currently, Australia is third.)
This adjustment is being driven principally by the growth of the twin forces of online and competition and is being enabled by a very cautious economic cycle in the countries mentioned above.
That said, it is important to note that clearly differentiated smart, ‘fit’ retail shops are growing. The other factor of course is the well-known fact that omnichannel, or what I like to call a retail ecosystem, is only viable with physical shops as the centrepiece. This realisation is fuelling brand growth and extension.
A call-out to our retail associations if I may. Please make this type of data public and help physical shop retailers see the reality of the situation and the light at the end of the tunnel. Continue to assist, as you do, in focussing their energies to develop “fitter retail business”.
People & Culture Executive
6 年Thanks for the article Brian. Most retailers typically downsize their physical footprint before reaching the point of closure, so perhaps the number of store closures is even greater than your stats suggest, when compared with the retailer at their peak? I know Russell Zimmerman at the ARA compiled a list a few years back of retailers who have closed, but I don't think it was as detailed to include the number of stores.
Ecommerce & Digital Transformation Consultant | Host of the Add To Cart podcast ??? | MAICD
6 年There's a trend here, most of these retailers sit "in the middle". Online or offline retail, you've got to stand for something.
Real Estate Economist and Strategic Investment Advisor at VARE Consulting Ltd
6 年A good article, Brian, but it side-steps the real issue, which is a financial one. Physical retailing has a number of barriers to entry, not least the need to raise substantial capital to build out the business. The capital requirements for online are much less and equity is very cheap. For as long as this situation persists, online retailers will take market share even if they do not make a profit. Physical retailers can fight back but this will mean increasing their cost of capital and reducing their margins. We currently see the results of that.
Mentor to Consultants - developing purposeful consulting enterprises, since 2001 | Mentor to Early-Stage Start-Ups - shaping prosperous futures, since 2006 | Mentor to SMEs - growing distinctive enterprises, since 2012
6 年Great stuff Brian Walker
Non-Executive Director. Board Advisor. Retail, consumer and FMCG focus. Start ups and business turnarounds, including interim management
6 年As usual, the devil is in the detail