Trump Transition | K-12 Ballot Measures | Superintendent Races | OPMs Beware the Lame Duck

Trump Transition | K-12 Ballot Measures | Superintendent Races | OPMs Beware the Lame Duck

This week, W/A co-founders Anna Edwards and Ben Wallerstein teamed up.

With President Biden assuring the country that he will oversee a peaceful transition of power after voters re-elected Donald Trump by decisive margins, the former president now has 10 weeks to formally prepare his return to the White House.

Of course, this isn’t Trump’s first rodeo.

Behind the scenes, his team has been laying the groundwork for months, working to identify political appointees for roughly 4,000 government positions—a third of which require Senate confirmation. Those appointments represent less than one percent of all federal employees, but they’ll be responsible for pursuing the major policy promises Trump made on the campaign trail.

As the parlor games commence over who is likely to fill which cabinet positions, take predictions with a grain of salt and be wary of those who claim certainty in knowing. Just because Trump supporter and Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters sent a letter to parents planning for the elimination of the U.S. Department of Education doesn’t mean he’s getting a seat at the table. Perhaps the nominee for education secretary will center less on education experience and more on the sort of management skills that could be needed to reimagine, and reorganize functions that may no longer sit within a single federal agency.

If you want to use history as a guide, here’s when the last three president-elects announced their choices for education secretary—none of whom garnered much in the way of media and insider attention ahead of their actual appointments:

  • Former President Barack Obama nominated Chicago schools chief Arne Duncan on December 16, 2008.
  • Trump nominated billionaire philanthropist Betsy DeVos on November 23, 2016.
  • Biden nominated Miguel Cardona, Commissioner of Education in Connecticut, on December 22, 2020.

No matter the pick, restructuring a federal agency or (more consequentially) making changes to the programs and funding streams administered by the Department won’t happen overnight. And, if anything is clear, it's that the Administration's rhetoric likely signals increased deference to states, which may welcome the increased flexibility. While we’ve been experiencing gridlock in Washington in recent years, there’s emerging bipartisan consensus among the nation’s governors and state chiefs when it comes to a handful of policy priorities—from high school transformation to more comprehensive accountability systems, work-based learning, and the implementation of recent science of reading laws.

From a higher education standpoint, Trump’s policy plans could include some bold policy moves, like wresting control of the accreditation process, or fining colleges and universities with excessively large endowments and using the money to establish an online “American Academy” that offers credentials without charging tuition.

What we know for sure is that major Biden administration policies, including the expansion of protections for LGBTQ+ students through Title IX and student loan forgiveness, are likely to be among the first things to go. We’re paying close attention to proposals from Linda McMahon’s America First Policy Institute as well.

Of course, until any of this is written on administration letterhead, it’s all conjecture.

There will continue to be more questions than answers in the months to come. How soon might Trump commit to eliminating the Education Department (which requires approval from Congress)? If that happens, which departments would absorb the current federal education programs? If Republicans keep the House, will we see a tax credit scholarship program advanced through budget reconciliation? What might be the ramifications of a deportation plan on K-12 schools, where roughly 4.4 million students have at least one undocumented parent?

Stay tuned in the weeks ahead.

In this week’s edition of Notes, we round up the “Top 5 Articles of the Week.”

We’re also covering:

  • Voters Decide: K-12 Ballot Measures
  • Standout Results From Superintendent Races
  • 5 Takeaways: How Will the Election Impact Higher Ed Policy at the State Level?
  • OPMs: Beware the Lame Duck


Voters Decide: K-12 Ballot Measure

Note: For the purpose of this analysis, all results have been rounded to the nearest percent.

Last week, W/A shared an update on 17 education-related ballot initiatives . Here’s what happened:

Colorado voters rejected Amendment 80 , which would have codified a school choice provision into state law. Of the 55% supporters needed for the initiative to pass, 48% voted yes.

Kentucky voters decisively said no to Amendment 2 , which would have granted the General Assembly constitutional authority to fund students at non-public schools with state funds. Gov. Beshear (D) expressed support for the result, releasing a statement that called for increased public school funding .

Massachusetts voters were tasked with deciding whether a baseline score on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) should remain a high school requirement. You can find our insights on the measure here . Ultimately, with 59% of voters in support, the MACS score requirement was nixed and removed from the state’s set of high school graduation requirements.

Amendment 1 in Florida asked voters to decide whether school board elections should be decided on a partisan basis. 60% approval was necessary to pass this measure. Only 55% of citizens said yes, not enough to alter the system.

Amendment 1 in Alabama passed with flying colors, as 74% of voters supported transferring management of the 16th section and indemnity school lands to the Franklin County Board of Education.

In Arkansas, Issue 1 passed with flying colors, as nearly 90% of voters felt that lottery funds should go towards scholarships for students attending vocational and technical institutions.


Top 5 “What We’re Reading” Articles of the Week

Want to receive our daily summary of education industry and policy news? Sign up for What We’re Reading .

  1. Why Gen Z college grads are feeling increasingly pessimistic about entering the workforce [Business Insider]
  2. Colleges, universities close across the county as enrollment drops [BizWomen]
  3. States are taking on fewer college costs. Who is picking up the bill? [Higher Ed Dive]
  4. Schools Need Tutoring Help from Their Communities — But Doing It Well Isn’t Easy [The 74]
  5. This School Didn't Like Traditional Grades. So It Created Its Own System [Education Week]


Standout Results From Superintendent Races

As W/A predicted last week, while Trump won North Carolina, Democrat Mo Green eked out a victory against Republican Michelle Morrow . Morrow had beaten the incumbent, Republican Catherine Truitt, in the primary.

The Montana race saw an almost exact opposite outcome, with Republican Susie Hedalen defeating Democrat Shannon O’Brien .

In North Dakota, incumbent Kirsten Baesler pulled out a decisive win against Jason Heitkamp , a former North Dakota State Senator. Baesler plans to continue pushing for local educational oversight and ensuring students are set up for success post-graduation.

The Superintendent race in Washington has not been called yet.


5 Takeaways: How Will the Election Impact Higher Ed Policy at the State Level?

With all eyes on Washington, the shifting sands of state higher education policy garnered little attention this week. But state budgets will have a profound impact on everything from student aid to university budgets, infrastructure improvements, and workforce development. Here are a few highlights from state and local races that will impact higher education in the year ahead.

  • California’s $10 billion education bond: California voters greenlit a $10 billion bond for educational infrastructure, aimed at modernizing facilities across K-12 schools and community colleges. $1.5 billion is earmarked for capital projects at the state’s 116 community colleges, helping to address aging facilities, support new campus construction and finance modernization efforts. [EdSource]
  • Republican gains and shifts in higher ed policy: Expect conservative lawmakers to flex their muscle on a wide range of issues from state higher education funding and workforce development to campus free speech and DE&I programming. Republicans made notable gains in several state legislatures. In Michigan, GOP victories in the House cost Democrats their trifecta, setting up budget battles over university funding. In North Carolina, Democrats defied national trends, weakening GOP supermajorities and giving Democratic Gov. Josh Stein more leverage on education policy in a state that has been a top allocator of state funding for higher education. [WTVD ABC11]
  • Rhode Island’s investment in higher ed infrastructure: Rhode Island voters approved a $160.5 million bond measure to upgrade higher ed facilities, including the construction of a biomedical sciences building at the University of Rhode Island and cybersecurity and upgrades to Rhode Island College’s Institute of Cybersecurity & Emerging Technologies to help create pathways to roles in the state's manufacturing, health care, and maritime (or "blue economy") sectors.
  • New Mexico bets big on higher ed spending with $230 million bond: New Mexico passed a $230 million bond supporting public higher ed, tribal schools, and special public institutions. The bond follows legislation signed by Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham earlier this year, which established a lottery-funded program for free tuition. This latest funding round will fuel critical campus upgrades, enhancing resources for a diverse student body across the state.


OPMs: Beware the Lame Duck

The election results this week have raised questions about just what the Biden administration may seek to accomplish over its final two months.

OPMs are paying especially close attention in the wake of rumblings that subregulatory guidance which enables the business model might be on the chopping block.

In response, the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (R-NC) issued a letter which raised concerns about the U.S. Department of Education (ED) efforts to rescind the 2011 Dear Colleague Letter . This letter created a safe harbor within the Higher Education Act’s ban on incentive compensation by allowing revenue sharing for “bundled services” that include recruitment.

Thus far, ED has tiptoed carefully around potential changes to the letter , signaling they want to review it carefully and that any changes could have a significant impact to learners.

An April 2022 GAO Report noted there were at least 2,900 higher education programs that partnered with Online Program Managers, which raises questions around how an abrupt policy decision may play out. If ED were to rescind the guidance, higher education institutions themselves would now be tasked with determining what revenue-share arrangements are allowable.

The W/A team will be watching this issue—and the Department’s actions in general—closely over the coming weeks.

Please reach out to us with any questions.


CSSCO Report: Six Ways to Improve Math Achievement

The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) released a new report outlining six actions state leaders can take to support math achievement. It highlights the key findings from the 2008 National Math Panel and states leading within each of these actions. [K-12 Dive]

  • Why it matters: Post COVID, mathematics performance continues to stagnate, according to state assessments . With all but six states passing a science of reading (SOR) law, there is growing momentum in support of numeracy related legislation.
  • What’s next: Ten states have passed math legislation in the last few years. W/A Research is closely tracking what states are poised to take action on math for the 2025 legislative session.
  • Districts, however, are not waiting for states to take action on math. The National Math Improvement Project (NMIP) is a community of practice of six of the largest, high-poverty districts in the country focused on improving math outcomes for students.


People on the Move

  • STEM education nonprofit Project Lead The Way (PLTW) announced the appointments of Dr. Jason Bailey to Executive VP and Chief of Staff, and John Williams to Executive VP and Chief Customer Officer. [EdTech Innovation Hub]
  • Paul Lalljie will step down from his role as CEO and on the board of edtech company 2U. 2U has started a search for a permanent CEO; CFO Matt Norden will serve as interim CEO effective immediately. [Higher Ed Dive]
  • GEMS Education announced Julie Young as an Education Advisor. Young—with a strong reputation as an innovator in online education and school design and decades of experience—will continue to serve as President of the Julie Young Foundation. [Edu Tech Talks]
  • Former D.C. public schools chancellor Michelle Rhee joined Equal Opportunity Ventures as venture partner. Equal Opportunity Ventures invests in early-stage businesses that seek to increase economic mobility through education and workforce development, among other sectors.
  • Language learning platform Babbel’s Arne Schepker is stepping down as CEO. Co-founder Markus Witte is expected to lead the company through an AI evolution as executive chairman and managing director. [TechCrunch]
  • Podium Education welcomed two additions to its executive team: Kim Caldbeck as Chief Marketing Officer and John Fillmore as COO. Caldbeck previously served as CMO at Coursera, and Fillmore as President of Chegg. [Higher Ed Dive]
  • BrainPOP is seeking a new Chief of Staff based in the NYC-area. Learn more and apply here .


Upcoming Events and Convenings


Stay Informed with Whiteboard Advisors' Newsletters

?? Whiteboard Notes: Published every Friday, this newsletter delivers a weekly recap of major education news, covering key policy updates and shifts across the education landscape.

?? What We’re Reading: PK-12 and Higher Education: Published Monday-Thursday, Kelly Branning curates the latest K-12 and higher ed news, research, and reports from across the country.

?? What We’re Reading: New Skills, Talent & Development: Every Wednesday, this newsletter provides insights on workforce development, HR tech, and the latest trends in corporate learning.

?? The EdSheet: Biweekly, Matthew Tower brings you the top education business news, from funding deals to mergers and acquisitions. Don’t miss out on the must-know financial happenings in the education sector.

?? Boundless Potential: Alison Griffin curates Colorado-focused news and activities every week for those who are nationally-minded but Western-focused.

Subscribe to any or all of our newsletters to ensure you never miss an update.


Porter Wideman Palmer M.S.Ed.

Social media, content curation, instructional media, curriculum and assessment, evaluation, and travel are my jam.

1 周

Thanks for covering the transition stuff. I'll be counting on your level-headed coverage.

要查看或添加评论,请登录