Trump May Inadvertently Create A Huge Need For An Army of Compliance Professionals

Trump May Inadvertently Create A Huge Need For An Army of Compliance Professionals

Trump May Inadvertently Create A Huge Need For An Army of Compliance Professionals

 The Compliance Exchange  December 6, 2016  Compliance  HedgeFundsXNews and Current EventsRegulatory News and DevelopmentsWall Street Executive Jobs  

By Jack J. Kelly

Writing a newsletter for an intelligent audience is both a blessing and a curse. We do not have to dumb-it-down like main stream media does, however, I usually get an earful of how wrong I am from people much smarter than myself.

Today, I received a call from an experienced Compliance and Legal professional that I greatly respect, Sean Casey. Sean was happy to criticize my somewhat dour outlook on the future prospects of compliance and regulatory professionals.

Sean suggested (that is a polite way to phrase it) that ComplianceX should try to focus more on positive developments. Most of the time people complain but are unable to offer solutions. Sean had some great ideas (I was initially going to steal them and present as my own but then felt guilty) that I would like to share with you

His thesis is that Donald Trump’s desires to keep jobs based in the US, ensure that corporations are not gaming the tax system through “tax inversions” (where they acquire or merge with a foreign domiciled company to pay less taxes) and other tax avoidance techniques, “rip-up bad trade deals” with other countries, and stop massive governmental waste and corruption could create a boom for Compliance and related professionals.

Trump’s recent intervention with Carrier Corp. to save manufacturing jobs in Indiana, based where his Vice President-elect, Mike Pence, just happens to be the Governor, was relatively easy. The difficulty will arise when Trump attempts to reenact this behavior on a large scale.

How could Trump possibly look for 1,000s of companies that may be off-shoring jobs to other countries, avoiding taxes by having foreign based subsidiaries, and watch over all the government and state waste and corruption? He may need to create other regulatory divisions such as the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Whistle-Blower unit to monitor these developments. Additionally, there may be a carrot-and-stick policy where Trump rewards certain behaviors such as keeping jobs in America and punishing those that are hiding assets elsewhere in the world. This would take a small army of compliance, legal, risk, audit and regulatory professionals to manage and police.

Here is another small example; if the Volcker Rule of Dodd-Frank fame is thrown out, proprietary trading at the big banks will start-up again. This would be a possible windfall for traders that have been displaced. Attorneys and compliance personnel will be needed to write new rules and regulations and then enforce them. This will hold true for many proposed regulatory changes.

Also, Trump has appointed smart savvy Wall Street, banking and private equity professionals to his administration. He has also assembled a “dream team” of CEOs to help guide him in creating new jobs and growing the economy.

If (and hopefully when) that happens, a reinvigorated economy with more jobs created will be great for everyone.

 

*Editors note from Devan Giordano- Check out some of Jack’s other recent articles here:


Jan Bingham

LCHB, Import/Export - Global Trade Compliance and Operations Professional

7 年

There is also the potential necessity of having more trained compliance professionals to understand "amended" FTA's I would venture to say DT will put in place instead of killing them altogether. I'm ready for that challenge!

Lila Landis, LCB CUSECO? CCEP-I

Global Compliance Leader and Executive | I build global compliance programs for today's business risk environment

7 年

For trade compliance professionals, we can look at the potential effects of Trump's proposed policies in two ways: on the negative side, a reduction in trade with China and Mexico could reduce the need for trade compliance personnel and harm our field for years to come; on the positive side, increasing the costs of imports from China and Mexico (and assuming that retaliation reduces exports to these countries) could increase the need for trade compliance professionals to help their organizations with strategic sourcing from other countries and increasing exports to other countries. Even if NAFTA goes away, we still have the Canadian Free Trade Agreement and several other Free Trade Agreements at our disposal, and the best trade compliance professionals will get creative to find new ways to add value.

Elena Klimchuk

VP, Compliance Officer - Regulatory Change Management

7 年

Well, he promised to create jobs, didn't he? Lol

回复
Erick Mann

Director Of Operations, National & International at A Clean Bio - Remediation Solution for Oil & Gas Spills

7 年

Yes, Jack companies that are not in Compliance to IDTheft Laws are overwhelming! When every company need's to take a serious look at their "Corporate Governance" they seem to be overlooking their OWN Policies! Your NPI, (Identity) is important to you and your Family as is everyones! erickmann.com

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jack Kelly的更多文章

社区洞察