TRUMP HAS ASSUMED THE POWERS OF KINGS THAT ENGLAND ABANDONED OVER 400 YEARS AGO (1600s) FOR A MORE DEMOCRAT PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.

Trump annoucnes he is a Meme King and takes the USA back to pre 1600  ENGLAND,  When he says Make America Great Again i didn't know he meant  1600 England -- colonialism, ruled by rich land owners (make that media owners)  plagues (he has mimized the CDC and research programs) and taxaation without representation (Tarriffs on imported products). Congress no onger represent the common man but mange their estates and kiss up to th eking or they will be tried for treason. He already is working on wife 3 while messing around with the and maidens like the Henrys) with a castlein Wasington and summer homes and estates(golf courses) across the land. Even his current wife like  Marie Antoinette wearing a jacket saying "I don't care"(similar to " Let them eat cake")        

Trump's vision of the presidency, emphasizing executive power and disregard for checks and balances, can be compared to the English monarchy before the Glorious Revolution of 1688. English kings wielded significant power during this period, often bypassing Parliament and the courts to enforce their will. Trump's vision of the presidency emphasizes executive power and disregard for checks and balances, which can be compared to the English monarchy before the Glorious Revolution of 1688. English kings wielded significant power during this period, often bypassing Parliament and the courts to enforce their will.

The Trump Administration's Approach to Executive Powers and the Judiciary

The Trump administration has demonstrated a willingness to use executive powers in ways that challenge traditional checks and balances. This approach has raised concerns about the potential for executive overreach and the undermining of judicial authority.

One key example of this approach is the extensive use of executive orders. Since taking office, Trump has signed numerous executive orders on a wide range of issues, including restricting DEI and gender ideology in government and schools, declassifying 1960s assassination files, and imposing tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China. These actions highlight the administration's preference for unilateral decision-making over legislative processes.

In addition to using executive orders, Trump officials have suggested that they might ignore court orders. For example, during a confirmation hearing, Trump's nominee for solicitor general, D. John Sauer, mentioned that there are "extreme cases" where it is conceivable that an elected official could defy a court order. This statement reflects a willingness to challenge judicial authority and raises questions about the administration's commitment to the rule of law.

Furthermore, the Trump administration has faced numerous legal challenges to its actions, with some top advisers openly questioning judicial authority. Trump's comments on court rulings that he disagrees with exemplify this adversarial stance towards the judiciary. For instance, he called a recent ruling blocking Elon Musk from accessing the Treasury's payment systems a "crazy" ruling and said, "No judge should frankly be allowed to make that kind of a decision, it's a disgrace". Such statements indicate a readiness to challenge and potentially disregard judicial decisions.

Another example of the administration's approach to executive powers is the invocation of executive privilege to withhold information from Congress. This tactic was used, among other instances, to prevent the release of special counsel Robert Mueller's full report. The administration has sought to limit congressional oversight and maintain control over sensitive information by invoking executive privilege.

In conclusion, the Trump administration's approach to executive powers and the judiciary has been characterized by a willingness to use executive orders, challenge court rulings, and invoke executive privilege. These actions have raised concerns about the potential for executive overreach and the erosion of the traditional checks and balances that underpin the U.S. government. THEY RESEMBLE THE POWERS THAT THE KING GAVE UP IN ENGLAND AROUND THE SIXTEEN HUNDREDS.

For example, King Charles I's reign (1625-1649) saw numerous conflicts with Parliament over taxation and royal prerogative issues. His refusal to work with Parliament led to the English Civil War and his execution. This period highlighted the dangers of unchecked executive power and set the stage for the eventual establishment of a constitutional monarchy.

Similarly, Trump's actions, such as bypassing Congress through executive orders and challenging court decisions, echo the behaviour of English monarchs before their powers were curtailed. The Glorious Revolution and the subsequent Bill of Rights in 1689 marked a turning point, establishing that the monarchy was subject to the law and Parliament12.

In essence, Trump's approach to the presidency mirrors the era of English kings who operated with significant autonomy and limited oversight. This period ultimately led to substantial constitutional reforms to limit executive power.