The True Story Behind October 7th, 2023

The True Story Behind October 7th, 2023

The cause for such action was enforced by Russia, China, and Iran.

?

By: Samuel Shay, Israel, March 2024

?

The True Story Behind Hamas’ Attack on Israel

On October 7th, 2023, the world was shocked when Hamas launched an attack on Israel. The big question on everyone’s mind was why? What was the purpose behind this attack? And why would a group like Hamas, known for its strategic and calculated operations, launch an attack with seemingly no meaning or vision behind it?

As we delve into the intricacies of this situation, it becomes clear that Hamas may not be the sole orchestrator of this attack. In fact, the real players pulling the strings behind this action are Iran, China, and Russia.

Iran’s interest in this attack stems from a desire to prevent its isolation in the Arab world. A peace agreement between Israel and the Arab world would leave Iran on the outside, with potentially damaging consequences. Before the attack on October 7th, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia were on the brink of signing a peace agreement and joining the Abraham Accord Peace Agreement. This would pave the way for other Arab countries to follow suit, leading to a new alliance between all Arab countries and Israel. The potential economic, educational, and cultural developments that would ensue from this alliance posed a threat to Iran’s influence in the region.

Then there’s China and Russia, who have been working on a new economic trade agreement called the BRICS with India, Brazil, South Africa, and Iran. The purpose of this agreement is to engage in economic trade without depending on the value of the dollar, thereby reducing American influence in trade transactions. The membership of Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Sudan in the BRICS would have greatly strengthened the alliance. However, if these countries were to engage in the Abraham Accord agreement with Israel, it would conflict with their interests in the BRICS and potentially weaken the alliance.

It’s clear that the attack by Hamas on October 7th was not simply a spur-of-the-moment decision by the organization. It was a carefully calculated move driven by the geopolitical interests of Iran, China, and Russia. The intricate web of alliances and conflicts of interest in the Middle East paints a complex picture of global politics and power dynamics.

As the world continues to grapple with the aftermath of this attack, it’s crucial to remember that behind seemingly singular actions by terrorist organizations, there often lies a web of geopolitical motivations and influences that shape the course of global events. It is only by understanding these complexities that we can hope to navigate the turbulent waters of international relations.

The grandiose concept of Putin becoming the top of the rules was a significant factor in the situation of Russia. For him, it was crucial to bring countries with financial capability into the BRICS and to eliminate the cooperation between the Gulf countries, Israel, and the United States.

When it was discovered that Saudi Arabia and Malaysia were going to sign a peace agreement with Israel around the same time, it was clear that action needed to be taken. The best way, in their eyes, was to create a disturbance in the stability of the Middle East. And so, they sought to incite a clash between the Palestinians and Israelis, hoping to derail any peace agreement between Israel and the Gulf countries.

To achieve this, Russia and China provided billions of dollars to Hamas leaders Ismail Ania and Khaled Mashaal to invest in war and launch an attack against Israel. This attack, which took place on October 7th, was seen as a clear attempt to disrupt the peace agreement.

However, to the surprise of those behind the attack, it did not have the intended effect. In fact, it backfired. The brutal action of Hamas served to expose the real intentions of the Palestinians, as well as the involvement of Iran, Russia, and China. This revelation led to a shift in the perceptions of Arab countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Qatar. They realized that the actions of these external powers were not aligned with the interests of the Arab world and were aimed at disrupting peace and prosperity in the region.

It became evident that the Palestinian leadership had no interest in pursuing a two-state solution, causing frustration among Arab countries. The investigation revealed that there was no genuine agenda, and the leaders of Hamas were solely interested in lining their own pockets and had no care for the Palestinian people.

This situation led to a realization that neither Arab countries nor any other nation were willing to accept the Palestinian leadership or support them. Moreover, it became clear that the actions of Iran, China, and Russia were detrimental to the Middle East and the Gulf region, where efforts were being made to foster peace and cooperation between Israel, the United States, and Arab countries.

In the case of Lebanon, Iran’s forcing of Hezbollah to attack Israel was similarly misguided, as there was no legitimate cause for such an attack. This further solidified the notion that the actions of these external powers were only serving to create chaos and misery in the region.

The recent conflict in the Middle East has shed light on the true intentions and actions of various parties involved. It has become evident that the interests of external powers, such as Iran, China, and Russia, are not aligned with the goals of peace and development in the region. This has led to a shift in the perspectives of Arab countries and a renewed commitment to pursuing stability and prosperity for the Middle East.

The Bible tells the story of Balaam and Balak, in which Balaam was sent to curse Israel but God turned his curse into a blessing. This story is seen as parallel to the current situation in the Middle East. The actions of the Palestinians, intended to sabotage peace agreements and prosperity in the region, are reminiscent of Balaam’s curse. However, these actions are now leading to a shift in attitudes towards Israel and the Palestinians.

Many countries that have historically supported the Palestinian cause are realizing that their support may have been misplaced. The Palestinian leadership’s refusal to engage in peace agreements and their perpetuation of hatred and violence against Israel from a young age have created a barrier to any potential peace negotiations.

There is a growing recognition that the Palestinian people need a new approach. It is argued that the Palestinian identity and history are relatively recent constructs and that they have no legitimate claim to the land they inhabit. The emergence of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the late 1960s is cited as evidence of this.

The shifting attitudes in the Middle East are reflected in recent peace agreements between Israel and several Arab nations. It is expected that more countries will follow suit, consolidating a united front against extremism and terrorism in the region.

This changing dynamic is expected to have repercussions on other global powers, particularly Russia and Iran. With the possibility of losing influence in the Middle East, these countries may be compelled to reconsider their support for extremist groups and adopt more cooperative policies.

The Abraham Accord peace agreement, and the potential for more countries to join, is seen as a step towards rebuilding the Middle East and fostering stability and prosperity in the region.

The movement of trade from the Pacific, through the GCC to Israel, and to Europe, has the potential to reshape global economic dynamics. Additionally, the inclusion of Africa in this trade route, through Egypt to Israel and then to Europe, could further amplify the impact of this development. This shift in trade patterns and industrial development has the potential to challenge Chinese dominance in the global market, as it could potentially mobilize raw materials from Africa to Israel, the Middle East, and Europe.

The implications of this shift are far-reaching, as it could significantly alter the balance of power in the global industrial landscape. With the potential for a train route connecting Africa, Israel, the Middle East, and Europe, this development has the capacity to catalyze a new era of industrial capability and economic growth. This, in turn, poses a major threat to China's position in the industrial world, as it could potentially dislodge them from their leading position.

The recent attack against Israel on October 7th takes on a new significance in light of these developments. The lack of a coherent agenda or strategy from the perpetrators of the attack, namely the Palestinians and Hamas, becomes clearer when viewed through the lens of these trade and industrial developments. The destruction that resulted from the attack has had far-reaching implications, with Gaza being left in ruins and the imminent demise of Hamas leadership.

The fallout from this attack has also led to a shift in support from the Arab world, with many countries withdrawing their backing of the Palestinian cause. As a result, the original plan for trade and industrial development in the region is gaining momentum, with the potential for widespread economic growth and development.

In conclusion, what was initially perceived as a curse has now emerged as a blessing, as this shift in trade and industrial development could have significant ramifications for global power dynamics. With the potential to challenge Chinese dominance and revitalize economic growth in the region, these developments herald a new era in global economic and industrial development.